Nobody wants to spend 2.5 hours at a regulation NCAAB game | The Boneyard

Nobody wants to spend 2.5 hours at a regulation NCAAB game

They had money on the Illinois-Indiana game and went to the monitor to get an update.

I would argue, based on the inconsistent whistle in the last 5 minutes or so, that our refs had money on Hall and the 10-11 pts. so they succeeded. suspend the 3 of them and check their venmos/PayPal’s/and equivalents!
 
I would argue, based on the inconsistent whistle in the last 5 minutes or so, that our refs had money on Hall and the 10-11 pts. so they succeeded. suspend the 3 of them and check their venmos/PayPal’s/and equivalents!

I thought the calls went SHU’s way for like 30 minutes and then our way for like 10.

I think Sanogo and Hawkins have their own rule book - you can put your hands all over both but if they extend their hands at all, they get whistled
 
No, you’re right.

Not sure what the solution is - the reviews have got to change, though.

If you did not see a flagrant clear enough to call it, skip the review.

Maybe just review the ones you do call.
How do reviews take so long? Like they show the review and I can tell in 5 seconds
 
I agree that the officiating has to get better, but there's nowhere I'd rather be than XL/Gampel for 2.5 or 3 hours. Bad thread title.
If it's 2.5 hours in regulation time, what you're watching is fouls, free throws, reviews and officials huddling. You're not watching a free flowing game with rhythm

Unfortunately, a better game to watch is 2 hours or less.

A six OT game in MSG is a different story
 
I’d love to see the Men’s game move to 4 quarters with adjusted timeouts. It’s really sped up the Women’s game.
 
I see this brought up a lot but don't really see how this fixes anything
2 less media timeouts per game probably shaves 5 minutes off. Maybe less FTs too since it resets every quarter, though I'm not sure what the data would say on that
 
Re: quarters. Agree how does adding two mandatory stoppages speed up a game? Advertisers aren’t ever giving up time. So adding an extra two buzzers would decrease flow within most games.
 
Anecdotally it seems the change has cut 10 minutes or so from the Women’s games. Less timeouts, with adjusted breaks for TV, as well as 5 fouls and no “1 and 1s” really seem to help the flow.
 
Heck, I'm old enough to remember when the NBA had 3-to-make-2 and 2-to-make-1 free throws.

Also, most women's games seem to end in under 2 hours, which gives them time to interview a player and/or coach after the game.
 
They aren’t (would never) giving up commercials in the men’s games. When has the nc2a ever made a decision that reduces revenue?!
 
I watch about 85% of the season off my Dad Video Recorder. I swear I was looking for a fast forward button during the 1st media TO (which have ballooned from 2 minutes to 3 1/2) vs. Marquette, as even if I watch a game live, I can still rewind, pause, and catch up. Cell service at the XL Center was awful too, so I couldn't catch up on texts or emails. Going to the bathroom in that old barn at halftime is a fools errand as well.

We'll see if Gampel is any better tonight. I'll at least have a couple more pops in me (due to my environment), than I did at the Marquette game.

The in-arena atmosphere is second to none, but the overall affair has fallen far behind the at-home experience in virtually every single other aspect.

As far as gameflow is concerned, I never believed I would long for an officiating crew of Ted Valentine, Jim Burr, and Tim Higgins. Yet here we are.
 

Online statistics

Members online
299
Guests online
3,185
Total visitors
3,484

Forum statistics

Threads
164,272
Messages
4,389,912
Members
10,197
Latest member
Whizzlerr


.
..
Top Bottom