No Concerns | Page 2 | The Boneyard

No Concerns

I think South Carolina is loaded and hungry. I've not seen the level of ferocity from uconn this season.
2nd half of TN game. Azzi took over at PG and ran the show. Add in a healthy Sarah, mix in all the speedy anklebiters like KK and K9. Hope for one good game between Jana and Serah and some timely shooting from Allie and you will see the real UConn.
 
You can tell it's February on the BY. UConn lost a game last year to Tennessee or two close games to Marquette and Nova this season.

The naysayers were out after the Tennessee game last year saying we had no post play. Our defense was terrible. No way could be beat the mighty Gamecocks or the taller UCLA Bruins. Same stories now with the Nova and Marquette games.

Well, we torched SC on the court a couple of weeks after Tennessee Then ran the BE tournament and the NCAA's. Semi finals we destroyed UCLA by 30+ and then buried SC again. Didn't hear from the naysayers!

Let's pay attention to what Azzi and Sarah have said after the Marquette and Nova games. They know what they didn't do that they should of.

Then some kind of bug has been going thru the team.

Geno's got this. His record proves it. He sees and knows a lot more about this team than any of us. He will have them ready.
 
At great risk 😊 I kinda agree with you. UConn did not play their "A" game. They played their "B" game, and I want to know on what planet that is a good thing. OK folks give me that thumbs down thingy.
One way to get to play in close games to get ready for the tournament is to play like crap. Also, there are 15 good reasons the team played poorly. Gulp, gulp the koolaid.
I’m a fan, which is short for fanatic and fanatics worry about everything. Just rewatched the championship game last night for the 20th time. Was Sarah’s performance stuff of legend? Heck yes, I’m worried about Sarah.
 
I’m impressed by a few remarks here, like @tomcat ’s observation that Sarah seems to have finally hit a ‘sophomore wall.’ This seems right to me. And the flu may play a role too. The interesting part is that it doesn’t last a whole game. It takes the form of tired play in the first half and torrid play in the second. Looking only at a basic boxscore after the game, you’d hardly notice anything amiss. This kinda reminds me of some of Maya’s games, like one against Stanford that really sticks out. Ordinarily she’d be on fire from start to finish. But not always.

It’s no disrespect to either Sarah or Maya to recognize that this happened occasionally. The key is what they did about it, which tended to be magnificent. They did what indomitable personalities do.

I also agree with @tomcat that passing has been… I’ll say less than crisp at times. Often it’s Azzi, and the fact is passing is not the shiniest part of her brilliance. But sometimes it’s Sarah, and this seems to happen from fatigue and also from being overly ambitious. I’m not panicked about it. This stuff happens. I’d like it to happen less, of course. But I’m not gonna let it overshadow the amazing things these two do every night. It’s their broad shoulders that will carry this team as far as it can go this season.

One last thing on my mind is the high expectations we all took away from last season’s run. It was amazing, and it started right after the Tennessee game. We haven’t seen the same pattern this season, not exactly. But then I have to pinch myself and remember that there were close games even in that barnburner of a tournament run. South Dakota played us really well in the first half until completely folding. It was a competitive game against an overmatched team. Oklahoma took a lead into the second half!!! Until, of course, Paige took over and it was game over by the end of the third quarter. And against USC, Azzi was cold as ice and this allowed them to make a fierce comeback in the 4th quarter to give us a scare. In true Geno fashion, he put the ball in Azzi’s hands with that infamous “elevator screen” and it sparked the rest of the team to shut USC down.

Mainly what my mind prefers to focus on is those totally dominant blowouts of UCLA and SC. Those were truly amazing. But the road that led to them had a few bumps that are too easy to overlook in memory.

Am I frustrated by a few lackluster first halves this season? Yes, of course. But I take comfort in the second half response that has almost always come — the only exceptions were in the Michigan game and, to a lesser extent in the Louisville game. In those games, the swoon came late not early. We haven’t seen that since then. I don’t expect 40 minutes of pure dominance every game. That’s unrealistic. What I hope for is clutch play when it counts, when it can decide the outcome. Sometimes it comes early, sometimes it comes late.

This season’s game against Tennessee was an interesting case in point. They took our first punch and hit back with the sort of aggressive defense we usually play and took the lead here and there. This continued even into the third quarter. Part of it was the chances Tennessee took on defense, and a few hot streaks from three, and part of it was cold streaks on our part that allowed them to shut down KK Kayleigh Ash and Allie. But they couldn’t sustain it for 40 minutes and midway through the 3rd Azzi and Sarah asserted themselves in the way the truly great tend to do. Once they did, their teammates were able to wreak their usual havoc. Ash and Allie found open shots, and Kayleigh drove the length of the court twice in a row for scores and broke Tennessee’s back… and their will. We went from being down by a point or two to a 30 point blowout. I’ve watched replays of that game a few times now just to remind myself of how greatness sometimes unfolds.

In that context, I’m frustrated to watch games like the last two, but not overly concerned. The second halves seem to follow the pattern of a championship team and as long as that continues, I remain confident.
 
I think South Carolina is loaded and hungry. I've not seen the level of ferocity from uconn this season.
Over the years... we've seen UConn as sort of the surgical team and other teams as frenzied teams. UConn has often been able to handle the hyper teams with their surgical approach. Sometimes not, though. Arizona comes to mind. We'll see.
 
Over the years... we've seen UConn as sort of the surgical team and other teams as frenzied teams. UConn has often been able to handle the hyper teams with their surgical approach. Sometimes not, though. Arizona comes to mind. We'll see.
AZ was physically stronger than us. Even their star Aari McDonald overwhelmed us physically. These UConn teams are a match for anyone physically. (look at last year) It's about playing well, executing, running your stuff and not forcing it and of course defensive connectiveness or connectivity.
 
.-.
Some people are "built" to be concerned over anything. Others exactly opposite,

For me 2 reasons which have a cumulative effect:

1--- Sarah has been sick as a result all other players can get exposed. Sarah is the number 1 player . That means so much more than just her points. When your number 1 player is off a bit into the heart of the season, that can catch up to a non-pro team. Teams just can’t click their heels and everything is okay. I don't understand why this seems to get bypassed as if "no big deal." More on that later.

2--- Add in that Blanca emerged as the number 3 player on the number 1 team in the country. Some of us believe that when she was healthy she was either the best or 2nd best freshman in the country. To jump ahead of the other players is remarkable. This is why Geno has made comments like he needs her back, or recently, when he said that that things finally caught up to the team with her out. Geno is telling us this. Why fight it? You have a sick Sarah and the loss of Blanca, - to repeat-- this caught up to them The poster speaking about school and grades if we use that analogy then let's also assume our child has had the flu the last few weeks which has lingered for quite a bit which has affected her studies.

I often disagree with the more critical posters. Call me a homer or half-full glass guy --whatever. But an example of in my "bias state," I read a post on here that someone says that "Sarah hit the Sophomore wall." This type of comment is a microcosm of why I feel the more critical posters go way overboard at times. If anyone is going to take the time to post often or make long posts that agree with this- then I'd ask them to go onto ChatGPT or copilot and just load the data in for that game and include advanced stats without giving the name and read what it spits back out to you in terms of how well that player played.

I don't agree with the concerns that often get put forth by some when they go overboard imo with quarter-by-quarter-Mico-game--by-game-analysis. On the flipside I don’t think UCONN is a lock to win it all. But in my bias state as I mention above with how much of an impact UCONN is losing along with Gneo's comments, ---->I loved the game. The other players are getting minutes in which they have an opportunity to play without a 100% Sarah and just-returned Blanca; thus playing with some stress rather than "forced substition just to give palyers time/others rest.." Sarah may get into foul trouble again In a big NCAAT situation. And as for Blanca she is a freshman - how reliable will she be in that S16/E8?FF/F game(s)?

In the long-run though imo the concerns are exaggerated just like the concern that Sarah hit a wall. And it's no surprise that when that post was 1st sent out about Sarah, many of the people that liked the post were the same posters I often disagree with Not saying any agreed nor am I saying "all" that I often disagree with. But just pointing out this out as a potential separation.
 
Last edited:
I don’t believe anyone is happy. However, there are some (including me) who think that UConn may benefit from this game in the long run. Any time you can perform under pressure, it builds up your confidence that you can do it again if/when you are in that position again. That’s why I was glad to see Sarah play well in the second half, Ash made timely (and needed) shots! Allie made her three and finished at the basket. There were lots of moments in this game where players stepped up under (some) pressure and performed. Those are all good things that would not have been as impactful if we had been n our usual 35 point Big East blowout.

Only the most optimistic fan would think that we will sail through the tourney again like last year! I hope that does happen but I think it far more likely that SC and UCLA (in particular) will be a real dogfight if we face them again. Of course there are others who could be tough as well but those two imo are the biggest threat to us. Anyway, every time our kids are successful under pressure is like a deposit into a savings account for them to draw on in similar situations, so yes, I’m glad our kids faced some pressure, but not that we played poorly. However, I do think that some here are understating the play of Villanova in this game.
I would have to disagree with you there. I've seen quite a few posts that were happy UCONN got a "challenging/under pressure" game.

There are just some of us who want that "challenging/under pressure" game to be against a S. Carolina, UCLA, Texas, LSU, etc., not against an unranked BE team because UCONN didn't play well.

What it really comes down to is UCONN doesn't have a very tough, interesting schedule this year.
 
I would have to disagree with you there. I've seen quite a few posts that were happy UCONN got a "challenging/under pressure" game.

There are just some of us who want that "challenging/under pressure" game to be against a S. Carolina, UCLA, Texas, LSU, etc., not against an unranked BE team because UCONN didn't play well.

What it really comes down to is UCONN doesn't have a very tough, interesting schedule this year.
A comment on UConn’s schedule this year. Obviously, the conference schedule is what it is. But Geno historically schedules the toughest OOC schedule in the nation. Unfortunately, a number of the OOC games that were scheduled several years ago turned out to be duds for reasons beyond Geno’s control. While Louisville, Iowa, tOSU and Michigan are all top 10 - top 15 teams, several other perennial ranked teams have fallen as follows:
  • ND - graduation and mass transfers
  • TN - collapsing, probably dropping out of the top 25 today
  • SC - conference scheduling problem, returning next season in November
  • FSU - loses the leading scorer in the nation & AA (Latson) to SC
  • Utah - Loses top player & AA (Kneepkins) to UCLA
  • USC - Loses Watkins, AA & potential NPOY to injury
  • USF - Loses HC to WNBA
UConn still played the toughest OOC schedule in the nation this season. But absent NIL, transfers and injuries to key players, UConn’s OOC schedule would have been absolutely brutal.
 
.-.
Last year was Paige, Azzi, and Sarah. That’s important too
Azzi was still rehabbing, did not play in the preseason game against Columbia and Sarah was in her first game of any kind as a freshman.
 
The Big East is very weak. UConn is NOT getting ready for March by playing any of those teams. If the game was even remotely competitive, it's because UConn played poorly or just shot poorly. Period.
 
A comment on UConn’s schedule this year. Obviously, the conference schedule is what it is. But Geno historically schedules the toughest OOC schedule in the nation. Unfortunately, a number of the OOC games that were scheduled several years ago turned out to be duds for reasons beyond Geno’s control. While Louisville, Iowa, tOSU and Michigan are all top 10 - top 15 teams, several other perennial ranked teams have fallen as follows:
  • ND - graduation and mass transfers
  • TN - collapsing, probably dropping out of the top 25 today
  • SC - conference scheduling problem, returning next season in November
  • FSU - loses the leading scorer in the nation & AA (Latson) to SC
  • Utah - Loses top player & AA (Kneepkins) to UCLA
  • USC - Loses Watkins, AA & potential NPOY to injury
  • USF - Loses HC to WNBA
UConn still played the toughest OOC schedule in the nation this season. But absent NIL, transfers and injuries to key players, UConn’s OOC schedule would have been absolutely brutal.
Agree, not really UCONN's fault, just the way it played out this year.
 
Last year was Paige, Azzi, and Sarah. That’s important too
But again....last year. We're talking about this year. And we're not talking about preseason.
 
But again....last year. We're talking about this year. And we're not talking about preseason.
We’ve lost the point of this discussion. You made it sound like a UConn win is inevitable against certain teams. I disagree. If the Huskies are sick or injured, disrespectful to the opponent by not playing to their ability, or simply outplayed, they can lose to anyone.

And @oldude , it doesn’t matter if Azzi didn’t play or if Sarah was a freshman, if UConn was playing to their ability they should have beaten anyone. But they didn’t. We don’t know why because it was a secret scrimmage but lose they did
 
The Big East is very weak. UConn is NOT getting ready for March by playing any of those teams. If the game was even remotely competitive, it's because UConn played poorly or just shot poorly. Period.
Is the Big East any weaker than it was last season? It did not hurt UConn last season. Also, UConn has beaten four Big 10 teams this season, three of them soundly and the other one they had an over twenty-point lead but had to hold on to win but, win they did. The Big East may not be preparing UConn to win but you can be sure that Geno is.
 
.-.
We’ve lost the point of this discussion. You made it sound like a UConn win is inevitable against certain teams. I disagree. If the Huskies are sick or injured, disrespectful to the opponent by not playing to their ability, or simply outplayed, they can lose to anyone.

And @oldude , it doesn’t matter if Azzi didn’t play or if Sarah was a freshman, if UConn was playing to their ability they should have beaten anyone. But they didn’t. We don’t know why because it was a secret scrimmage but lose they did
And Geno was thrilled. He had something to hold over them for months.
 
Is the Big East any weaker than it was last season? It did not hurt UConn last season. Also, UConn has beaten four Big 10 teams this season, three of them soundly and the other one they had an over twenty-point lead but had to hold on to win but, win they did. The Big East may not be preparing UConn to win but you can be sure that Geno is.
According to both Massey and Torvik, YES, the Big East is weaker this season than last.
 
The Big East is very weak. UConn is NOT getting ready for March by playing any of those teams. If the game was even remotely competitive, it's because UConn played poorly or just shot poorly. Period.
Maybe Geno and CD are just unicorns in preparing their teams for the NCAAT? (Source: SRSCB):
  • The SRS statistic is on every team/ conference page.
IMG_9237.jpeg


Despite UConn’s conference affiliation? (Source: SRSCB Big East Conference Index).
  • Check out the Big East’s SRS for UConn’s championship years.
IMG_9234.jpeg


The Big East has always been one of the stronger conferences (out of 31 conferences), ranked from as high as 2/3 to as low as 10 (1 time). It is typically in the Top 5/6/7 of conferences by SRS every year. Source
 
What it really comes down to is UCONN doesn't have a very tough, interesting schedule this year.
I
I guess it comes down to as a fan how much does the schedule matter to each person. For me, if I'm going to spend 2 hours of my day watching a game, I want to be entertained. Geno's style imo fits the exact way his teams need to play and the style he employs is just fun to watch which is why I became such a fan. .I think it's why many became such a fan. And over the years imo his use of the bench has been spot on too. For me this means play fastbreak basketball whether you have 5 or 10. I love watching explosive offense and fastbreak basketball. As a result, for example a post was made on this thread that the game was in some manner boring/unattackable. And it's a post you liked as well I believe. For me this game and the last that you and some others complained in some manner about were fast paced basketball. I loved it.

I say this in fun - so take it that way- I feel sorry for some of you that can't appreciate fast paced basketball regardless of the opponent. Did you know that the pace of play which I checked was 81.4 with providence and 79.2 with Villanova? The 81% which you and other seem to think so bad (wehther boring or poor play in your view) in some manner this past game is deemed as rare in the wcbb world. And the pace in the Nova game only gets ranked between 1% and 2% of the time- closer to 1%.

I guess we just have different views of our enjoyment to watch. This game imo was extremely fun to watch. Their pace was incredible. No top 10 team has achieved that pace in a single game and only 3 or 4 achieved higher than 79.2. .I guess I have much more enjoyment of the team than caring as much as you and some others do of the opponenet.
 
Last edited:
I
I guess it comes down to as a fan how much does the schedule matter to each person. For me, if I'm going to spend 2 hours of my day watching a game, I want to be entertained. Geno's style imo fits the exact way his teams need to play and the style he employs is just fun to watch which is why I became such a fan. .I think it's why many became such a fan. And over the years imo his use of the bench has been spot on too. For me this means play fastbreak basketball whether you have 5 or 10. I love watching explosive offense and fastbreak basketball. As a result, for example a post was made on this thread that the game was in some manner boring/unattackable. And it's a post you liked as well I believe. For me this game and the last that you and some others complained in some manner about were fast paced basketball. I loved it.

I say this in fun - so take it that way- I feel sorry for some of you that can't appreciate fast paced basketball regardless of the opponent. Did you know that the pace of play which I checked was 81.4 with providence and 79.2 with Villanova? The 81% which you and other seem to think so bad (wehther boring or poor play in your view) in some manner this past game is deemed as rare in the wcbb world. And the pace in the Nova game only gets ranked between 1% and 2% of the time- closer to 1%.

I guess we just have different views of our enjoyment to watch. This game imo was extremely fun to watch. Their pace was incredible. No top 10 team has achieved that pace in a single game and only 3 or 4 achieved higher than 79.2. .I guess I have much more enjoyment of the team than caring as much as you and some others do of the opponenet.
Not sure why you're trying to explain this to me. I enjoy watching UCONN blow teams out. Good teams, bad teams, whatever. BUT I would rather see them blow out a S. Carolina, Texas, a top ranked team, than blow out a not ranked team. It's more fun.

The point though that we're (at least me and a couple people on here) discussing is UCONN did NOT blow out Nova. UCONN played rather poorly (as compared to how they can and have played) and that made for a more "competitive" game. This made some people very happy. Not me. I'd much prefer a blow out. Especially of a non-ranked BE team.

I love watching UCONN play well.....but against Nova, they didn't play very well. (again comparatively)
 
We’ve lost the point of this discussion. You made it sound like a UConn win is inevitable against certain teams. I disagree. If the Huskies are sick or injured, disrespectful to the opponent by not playing to their ability, or simply outplayed, they can lose to anyone.

And @oldude , it doesn’t matter if Azzi didn’t play or if Sarah was a freshman, if UConn was playing to their ability they should have beaten anyone. But they didn’t. We don’t know why because it was a secret scrimmage but lose they did
That's my point. UCONN didn't play well against Nova. Sooooo, people shouldn't be so happy about having a "competitive" game.

Having a "competitive" game against a S. Carolina or UCLA (top ranked team) = good

Having a "competitive" game against Nova (a not ranked BE team) because UCONN played poorly = bad
 
.-.
Not sure why you're trying to explain this to me. I enjoy watching UCONN blow teams out. Good teams, bad teams, whatever. BUT I would rather see them blow out a S. Carolina, Texas, a top ranked team, than blow out a not ranked team. It's more fun.

The point though that we're (at least me and a couple people on here) discussing is UCONN did NOT blow out Nova. UCONN played rather poorly (as compared to how they can and have played) and that made for a more "competitive" game. This made some people very happy. Not me. I'd much prefer a blow out. Especially of a non-ranked BE team.

I love watching UCONN play well.....but against Nova, they didn't play very well. (again comparatively)
I'm sorry I goofed. In the Prov Thread someone (don’t want to name) said game was "tough to watch." I thought you provided "A like." I goofed. My bad.

It's all about preferences. And if that's your preference great which is mine too. And I didn’t know if it's the same for you I can have a preference but still like very, very, very much a secondary preference. Ergo the fast pace being brought back unlike the Marquette game. With that fast pace being as it was and Nova shooting way over-their-head-- it was a fun game. The point is yeah I am happy and people are okay to be happy too. The opponent was Nova. That was the game I was watching. Not UC vs SoCar.

And with Blanca getting back and Sarah having a good game - that made it much more understandable as the stats of pace of play show that Marquette was unusual while pace of play picked up considerably vs Nova. Which I found out was among overall the best this year from top 10 teams. Gotta love it. Why wouldn't people be happy about this? Sarah being back to unreal efficiency vs Nova is an example.

In fact it was no accident that Geno cited that the team finally missed Blanca after the Marq game. Seven of the 9 core players played for a title team last year (regardless if some weren't core), one transfer played for an E8 team, and Geno is citing that his team missed a freshman. That's a pretty big thing, isn't it?

Also, there has been some pretty wierd unwarranted paranoia going around such as some post which I can no longer find that someone has suggested that Sarah has hit the soph wall. Unless context is provided that she's been sick and if so her wall is still pretty spectacular.

,
 
Last edited:
As a result some of us fans don't make a big deal over a 2 game stretch in which they don't play as well but they still win. And stil enjoy the wins, and at least one of the games if not both.
Well the point (of this whole conversation, that I'm involved in) was some fans DID make a big deal about UCONN having a "competitive" game. And were happy about it.

Our (my) counter-point was it was only "competitive" because UCONN didn't play all that well (relatively to what they have/can). And there is no reason to be happy about that.
 
Someone please explain to me the calculus on how the quality of who UConn has to play says anything about the quality of the UConn team? I say it says jack.
Well probably just the unknown. We know IF we play well we can easily beat most mid ranked to unranked teams easily.

What we don't know is how we'll do against the top teams, like top 5 or so. Because we haven't played anyone ranked that high. The highest ranked team we've played is #8 Michigan. And we did not easily beat them.

Soooo, if we played a higher quality schedule (like a couple 2-5 ranked teams), we'd probably have a better idea of where/what this team really is.

And who knows, playing tougher competition, might make the team better???
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,473
Messages
4,576,646
Members
10,488
Latest member
husky62


Top Bottom