NIL Hits The WNBA | Page 2 | The Boneyard

NIL Hits The WNBA

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
2,760
Reaction Score
12,787
If I pony up 250k for every player on a team...don't I own it essentially? Don't I get a say in who you draft? Who you cut? You think my influence will stop after I cut that check? And you say...well everyone can do it. I don't think so. And besides...199k in Vegas is like double that in the NY market. I know it aint the same.
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,463
Reaction Score
36,026
If I pony up 250k for every player on a team...don't I own it essentially? Don't I get a say in who you draft? Who you cut? You think my influence will stop after I cut that check? And you say...well everyone can do it. I don't think so. And besides...199k in Vegas is like double that in the NY market. I know it aint the same.
Maybe it's because Nevada doesn't have an income tax, while New York gouges the players on their income tax. No you don't own it, the LVCVA doesn't own a thing, they are using their dollars to promote Las Vegas and the entities within Clark County. Like I stated earlier, if the WNBA decides to stop this, there will be a lawsuit and they will lose in the end. This is outside income that has nothing to do with the league.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
2,760
Reaction Score
12,787
Maybe it's because Nevada doesn't have an income tax, while New York gouges the players on their income tax. No you don't own it, the LVCVA doesn't own a thing, they are using their dollars to promote Las Vegas and the entities within Clark County. Like I stated earlier, if the WNBA decides to stop this, there will be a lawsuit and they will lose in the end. This is outside income that has nothing to do with the league.
See you in court. I think the deciding issue will be to what extent it impacts the WNBA's internal workings. And I know the title of the thread mentions NIL, but this isn't that since these players are actually employees, unlike student athletes. Should be interesting what is decided.
 

UConnCat

Wise Woman
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
13,830
Reaction Score
86,011
I actually see this as being a game changer. If playing in Las Vegas means that players get an extra hundred thousand dollars, even though that's from an outside agency and not from the team, then they have a competitive advantage versus every other team. That means that every other team has to find sources of revenue in order to be competitive. At least one of them will up the ante.

Things are about to become very interesting in the WNBA.
Exactly, which is why the WNBA has opened an investigation and will take a hard look at this. This could open the door for other creative ways to circumvent the salary cap. Remember the Aces were investigated last year for attempting to make under-the-table payments to free agents. Regarding this arrangement, the Aces have said "we know nothing,"

Endorsement deals for individual players are one thing; this is money given to every player on the team for what essentially sounds like a no-show job (the LVCVA CEO stated: "The offer is really simple. We want you to just play.")

The CBA has provisions that aim to prevent circumvention of the salary cap. The provision cited (below) would be most relevant. Although the understanding at issue may not violate the specific language of this provision it may violate the spirit of the provision. Will be interesting.

It shall constitute a violation of Section 1(a) above for a Team (or Team Affiliate) to enter into an agreement or understanding with any sponsor or business partner or third party under which such sponsor, business partner or third party pays or agrees to pay compensation for basketball services (even if such compensation is ostensibly designated as being for non-basketball services) to a player under Contract to the Team. Such an agreement with a sponsor or business partner or third party may be inferred where: (i) such compensation from the sponsor or business partner or third party is substantially in excess of the fair market value of any services to be rendered by the player for such sponsor or business partner or third party; and (ii) the Compensation in the Player Contract between the player and the Team is substantially below the fair market value of such Contract.
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2024
Messages
60
Reaction Score
379
Exactly, which is why the WNBA has opened an investigation and will take a hard look at this. This could open the door for other creative ways to circumvent the salary cap. Remember the Aces were investigated last year for attempting to make under-the-table payments to free agents. Regarding this arrangement, the Aces have said "we know nothing,"

Endorsement deals for individual players are one thing; this is money given to every player on the team for what essentially sounds like a no-show job (the LVCVA CEO stated: "The offer is really simple. We want you to just play.")

The CBA has provisions that aim to prevent circumvention of the salary cap. The provision cited (below) would be most relevant. Although the understanding at issue may not violate the specific language of this provision it may violate the spirit of the provision. Will be interesting.

It shall constitute a violation of Section 1(a) above for a Team (or Team Affiliate) to enter into an agreement or understanding with any sponsor or business partner or third party under which such sponsor, business partner or third party pays or agrees to pay compensation for basketball services (even if such compensation is ostensibly designated as being for non-basketball services) to a player under Contract to the Team. Such an agreement with a sponsor or business partner or third party may be inferred where: (i) such compensation from the sponsor or business partner or third party is substantially in excess of the fair market value of any services to be rendered by the player for such sponsor or business partner or third party; and (ii) the Compensation in the Player Contract between the player and the Team is substantially below the fair market value of such Contract.
The quoted section of the bargaining agreement is interesting. Can it be circumvented by having the LVCVA reword the agreement for out-of-season promotional appearances, and vary the amount of the payment based on some sort of perceived value to the team? Can that clause hold up in a very conservative court environment as it limits the freedom to earn more money, kind of like the way noncompete clauses have been rendered illegal? I don't know the answer, of course, as it's all theoretical right now, but the ability of the WNBA to limit income opportunities seems shaky.
 

Sifaka

O sol nascerá amanhã.
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
1,002
Reaction Score
8,678
I believe that if the WNBA tries to stop this that the players will have a nice lawsuit on the horizon and in the end that the W will end up losing.
Unless the contract between the WNBA and the players prohibits earnings from other sources, such as testimonials, sponsors ads, play for other leagues in the W off season, etc., there is not anything the W can do to legally impede this earning stream for the LV players.

Someone expressed a concern about “optics”. Hah! What are the optics for a league that is so poor at marketing its product that it cannot afford to pay its employees a decent wage?

Oh! those women. They want to earn enough to support a family without having to live in hotels in Russia or Turkey. The nerve!

Optics. Indeed.
 
Last edited:

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,448
Reaction Score
211,245
Bad news for the Sun. No way Uncasville is going to pony up 1.2 million in "sponsorships" to be competative with large market franchises.
Is the casino ownership separate from the team ownership? If so then they could pay the team to walk around the mall and talk to people periodically.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,448
Reaction Score
211,245
Endorsement deals for individual players are one thing; this is money given to every player on the team for what essentially sounds like a no-show job (the LVCVA CEO stated: "The offer is really simple. We want you to just play.")
I've often thought the same thing regarding college NIL. The easiest for the current "wild West" situation is to make players accepting NIL from a booster of the team that they play for a disqualifying event. Do you want to have a deal with Nike, chipotle, Kool-Aid, it's all good. Do you want to have a deal from Lenny's car wash where Lenny is a booster of the team, not so good. (for what it's worth that approach was at the suggestion of huskyhawk on the men's board. But it makes sense to me.

To your point, teams like Miami have had boosters pay a flat rate for every offensive lineman. As you point out that's a payment for playing rather than NIL.

I wasn't aware of the WNBA CBA agreement that you quoted. The compensation in excess of services rendered language sure seems applicable.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Messages
169
Reaction Score
522
Is the casino ownership separate from the team ownership? If so then they could pay the team to walk around the mall and talk to people periodically.
Good question. I have never paid for a ticket to a Sun game including the CC game.
 

Sifaka

O sol nascerá amanhã.
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
1,002
Reaction Score
8,678
1.
Although the understanding at issue may not violate the specific language of this provision it may violate the spirit of the provision. Will be interesting.
2. It shall constitute a violation of Section 1(a) above for a Team (or Team Affiliate) to enter into an agreement or understanding with any sponsor or business partner or third party under which such sponsor, business partner or third party pays or agrees to pay compensation for basketball services (even if such compensation is ostensibly designated as being for non-basketball services) to a player under Contract to the Team. Such an agreement with a sponsor or business partner or third party may be inferred where: (i) such compensation from the sponsor or business partner or third party is substantially in excess of the fair market value of any services to be rendered by the player for such sponsor or business partner or third party; and (ii) the Compensation in the Player Contract between the player and the Team is substantially below the fair market value of such Contract.
1. In contract law, words matter. If the words are adhered to, subjective notions of he spirit tend not to prevail in court.

2. Compensation for welcoming visitors does not constitute payment of compensation for basketball services. As to your bolded portion, how might anyone deem such payment to be substantially in excess of fair market value? Expiring minds want to know. :cool:
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
2,690
Reaction Score
13,918
The guy that presented the deal specifically mentioned them threepeating. It seems clear that the money is for basketball services. If they were not playing basketball for the Aces they would not be offered this money.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
2,794
Reaction Score
18,327
I'm not questioning the rest of your points, but disagree with the way you are describing this as taxpayers money. It is not taken from income, sales or property tax. If you view money that comes from someone that is a taxpayer as taxpayer money, then if I but a big gulp at the local 7 Eleven and the owner ultimately spends it, he is spending taxpayer money. Looking at it that way the only money that isn't tax payer money is money coming from someone that doesn't pay taxes.

This is a local tax on discretionary spending, mostly applied to out of town visitors. I agree it could be an issue from an unfair competitive advantage standpoint. I would compare this more to a state paying a celebrity to do a commercial to promote a state lottery.

There are real issues here, but not because of where the money comes from., rather because of the potentially unfair competitive advantage, which is a broad issue pertaining to many things. The league obviously had a problem with chartered flights if wealthy team owners gave their team a competitive advantage over others that couldn't afford it. The same is true but not mentioned as often regarding training facilities.

The Aces built a state of the art training facility, and many teams don't even have a dedicated practice facility. Seattle has done the same this year. I presume the unfair competitive advantage argument could come up there as well. Some teams have the advantage of owners who can indirectly compensate players with advantages others teams can't. It will be interesting how this all plays out.
Any tax revenue represents taxpayer funds, public funds, and is a payment of diverted taxpayer public revenue to the team creating an ultra above salary cap payment. If I send you $100 of sales tax revenue through a public agency or private agency, it's still taxpayer monies and is taxable income to the recipient. It won't stand up.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
2,794
Reaction Score
18,327
1. In contract law, words matter. If the words are adhered to, subjective notions of he spirit tend not to prevail in court.

2. Compensation for welcoming visitors does not constitute payment of compensation for basketball services. As to your bolded portion, how might anyone deem such payment to be substantially in excess of fair market value? Expiring minds want to know. :cool:
What are they getting paid for if not basketball services? It's a subterfuge at best. The real problem in my mind is that it is public taxpayer revenue. How much do they get per hour to welcome visitors? $5000.00? $10,000.00?
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
2,760
Reaction Score
12,787
What are they getting paid for if not basketball services? It's a subterfuge at best. The real problem in my mind is that it is public taxpayer revenue. How much do they get per hour to welcome visitors? $5000.00? $10,000.00?
I didn't look terribly hard, but I couldn't find anything where they did anything for anyone at the airport or any other venue. Maybe it's something they're going to be doing?
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,463
Reaction Score
36,026
That's not a player. Big difference. And if they want to support the team...negotiate that logo on the jersey. Just do not pay individual players. You could say well Clark just struck a huge deal with Nike (?). Difference is...not the entire team and her deal stands no matter what team she plays for.
That doesn't help the players, it helps the teams. The WNBA has been around since 1997 and they still haven't grown. The players still get measly pay and benefits, it's not the players fault, it's the league.
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,463
Reaction Score
36,026
I didn't look terribly hard, but I couldn't find anything where they did anything for anyone at the airport or any other venue. Maybe it's something they're going to be doing?
What do you mean by "anything at the airport or any other venue"? Community bulletin boards announcements are taped and played on video screens throughout the airport as well as the convention center.
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,463
Reaction Score
36,026
Is the casino ownership separate from the team ownership? If so then they could pay the team to walk around the mall and talk to people periodically.
The team is owned by Mark Davis, which they pay to play in Michelob Arena in the Mandalay Bay Casino owned by MGM Resorts. Both are separate from each other as well as separate from the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority.
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Messages
570
Reaction Score
2,286
That doesn't help the players, it helps the teams. The WNBA has been around since 1997 and they still haven't grown. The players still get measly pay and benefits, it's not the players fault, it's the league.
I keep reading how the league management is incompetent. So my challenge to any of you: Start your own league and do better.
I can assure you it is WAY tougher than you make it out to be.

What exactly would YOU do to increase revenue across the entire league.

And for those who think these payments in LVA will force the other owners to pony up more funds, I submit that several would just fold the franchise. So much for expansion.
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,463
Reaction Score
36,026
I keep reading how the league management is incompetent. So my challenge to any of you: Start your own league and do better.
I can assure you it is WAY tougher than you make it out to be.

What exactly would YOU do to increase revenue across the entire league.

And for those who think these payments in LVA will force the other owners to pony up more funds, I submit that several would just fold the franchise. So much for expansion.
Maybe they need to kind of force the owners to meet minimum guidelines across the board, like player facilities, home court standards. Restricting players from signing contracts outside of league play is not good for business and has a good chance of losing in court, no matter what their bylaws say.
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
2,690
Reaction Score
13,918
The problem with this is not that it’s bad for the Aces to get some swag but rather that it is going to create a competitive advantage for the franchise! There is no way other teams are going to be able to match this!
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,463
Reaction Score
36,026
The problem with this is not that it’s bad for the Aces to get some swag but rather that it is going to create a competitive advantage for the franchise! There is no way other teams are going to be able to match this!
The problem is that the franchise has nothing to do with the contract or its negotiation of the contract. So as far as I'm concerned the league has no way to stop it from happening, unless they want to have a heck of a lawsuit to worry about and some very bad publicity.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
2,760
Reaction Score
12,787
What do you mean by "anything at the airport or any other venue"? Community bulletin boards announcements are taped and played on video screens throughout the airport as well as the convention center.
I would think these ads could be seen on the internet somewhere as I assume they are geared towards visitors or potential visitors.. Maybe not.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
2,760
Reaction Score
12,787
That doesn't help the players, it helps the teams. The WNBA has been around since 1997 and they still haven't grown. The players still get measly pay and benefits, it's not the players fault, it's the league.
I don't disagree with this. But, the league has a stake here. So if it takes a court to figure it out so be it.
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,463
Reaction Score
36,026
I would think these ads could be seen on the internet somewhere as I assume they are geared towards visitors or potential visitors.. Maybe not.
You are incorrect, the LVCVA has the feeds and uses them at the Airport, the Las Vegas Convention center and has a channel in the hotels in town. They did have one during last years final with Wilson and Plum, but that might have been a local only commercial.
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,463
Reaction Score
36,026
Exactly, which is why the WNBA has opened an investigation and will take a hard look at this. This could open the door for other creative ways to circumvent the salary cap. Remember the Aces were investigated last year for attempting to make under-the-table payments to free agents. Regarding this arrangement, the Aces have said "we know nothing,"

Endorsement deals for individual players are one thing; this is money given to every player on the team for what essentially sounds like a no-show job (the LVCVA CEO stated: "The offer is really simple. We want you to just play.")

The CBA has provisions that aim to prevent circumvention of the salary cap. The provision cited (below) would be most relevant. Although the understanding at issue may not violate the specific language of this provision it may violate the spirit of the provision. Will be interesting.

It shall constitute a violation of Section 1(a) above for a Team (or Team Affiliate) to enter into an agreement or understanding with any sponsor or business partner or third party under which such sponsor, business partner or third party pays or agrees to pay compensation for basketball services (even if such compensation is ostensibly designated as being for non-basketball services) to a player under Contract to the Team. Such an agreement with a sponsor or business partner or third party may be inferred where: (i) such compensation from the sponsor or business partner or third party is substantially in excess of the fair market value of any services to be rendered by the player for such sponsor or business partner or third party; and (ii) the Compensation in the Player Contract between the player and the Team is substantially below the fair market value of such Contract.
This is Vegas, where dealers and even cocktail servers can make more than $100K a year when you include the tips. So who is going to be the arbitrator on what is a fair market value on a contract from an organization that spends over a $100M in advertising a year? 1.2M is peanuts and most likely brings in more than that amount in high rollers that come to watch the Ace vs New York, L.A. and others. So far this season 15 of the 20 home games are already sold out with the chance of all of them ending up at the end to being sold out. They have already broken the league record with the 15, they are the second hottest team in Vegas only behind the Golden Knights.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
319
Guests online
2,213
Total visitors
2,532

Forum statistics

Threads
157,471
Messages
4,103,622
Members
9,994
Latest member
Newbie32


Top Bottom