Well, if Delaware really did get exposed, then it's too bad that Georgia Tech and PSU weren't similarly exposed, since they have only the 1 measly top 25 win on the year and GTech has only one more win against the top 50 teams than Delaware after the win over Gtown even though they have had many more opportunities. And let's not mention the 2nd round losers like Florida and California that have been praised for gritty efforts there but had 0 top 25 wins this year.
Why do we crap on the gutty mid majors who make good runs and come up a little short while lauding the nonstarring major conference teams who somehow put everything together to get to the Sweet 16? Delaware had a great season and their stats represent a solid team, not some exposed pretender. They were #1 in FT %, 12th in FG% and 31st in FG% defense, 1oth in turnovers, 9th in personal fouls, 15th in assist\TO ratio, and 37th in 3-pt% defense -- all signs of a disciplined well-coached team. Sure, their SOS was up around 80th, so let's go dump on the two mid-majors left in the Sweet 16 because their SOS is worse. We know mid-majors have it tough this time of year, but some of us like to cheer on the underdog, even when they get rewarded as an overdog and arouse some jealousy. It used to be that Delaware was being slammed here for not using EDD enough, or properly, or whatever. Now they're slammed for being a one-trick pony, maybe like a Jackie Stiles SW Missouri team. Guess what, that can work sometimes.
This is sad. We know EDD left UConn and had her reasons, but for Husky fans to be gloating over Delaware's demise is just bad. Back in 1991 an upstart 29-5 UConn team from nowhere's-ville had a nice little run in the tourney behind a star player named Kerry Bascom, and I hope the VA fans that year weren't chortling that ex-assistant Auriemma's team had finally been exposed when the Huskies got knocked off. Let's just say that Delaware had a great run and is building for even better next year.