If you're going to join the conversation, actually do so. I was responding to a post that said Lubin couldn't start because there are "simply too many proven options ahead of him," which is hogwash. Stating an irrefutable fact that Facey is not proven at this level is not "writing him off," and I'll thank you to not put words in my mouth.
First, I said "I'm not sure why everyone is writing him off", not "I'm not sure why CallMeBruce is writing him off" - I'll thank you to not put words in my mouth. My attempt at joining the conversation was simply to point out that there's a reason Facey isn't "proven" in one sense of the word- he had an amazing combination of talent and experience ahead of him. I understand that you were trying to point out that he's not necessarily the most "proven" player, but that's not a judgment made in a vacuum. No one is saying Facey will be a break out star because of that, it's just that in comparing Facey and Lubin, it's funny that Lubin is given the edge by some, as Facey was both more highly regarded out of high school and has a year in the system already under his belt. You made the point that if Lubin can rebound and defend it will earn him a starting spot, which could very well be true, but I also remember last year, in his incredibly limited game time, the two aspects that Facey excelled at were his defense and rebounding. Only time will tell how this ends up shaking out.
