UChusky916
Making the board a little less insufferable
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 3,286
- Reaction Score
- 17,154
It's funny how preconceptions can be so wrong. I would have thought him a banger and less quick than the other bigs. But if Nolan's perception is accurate I couldn't have been more wrong. If accurate it will be the coaches job to get him to slam players at least as hard as Tyler. While not as easy as some would think, I feel that is more doable than trying to get quickness out of someone who is physically limited in speed.
The confidence is a great attribute.If Rock is half as good as he thinks he is, we will be in great shape.
I came away with a similar impression when I viewed his games. I wasn't sure, however, how much of his defensive failures were the result of physical and mental limitations (speed, desire, BBIQ) and how much were the result of necessity given that Rakim was the only "tall" physical player on that team. If it was the coaches plan to keep Rock on the court for the majority of the game he may have advocated a less aggressive approach to Rock's game with the intention of avoiding foul trouble and conserving energy. If I were motivated enough I'd re-watch the games to see if he played more aggressively as the game progressed and foul trouble was not a concern.the news of him knocking out defensive drills is encouraging, don't want to take too much out of a 3 game sample size, but in those 3 games I watched I thought he was a nightmare on the defensive end, very poor in rotating and offering help. Some of that is on him but it didn't seem like the coach was holding him accountable so he gets some of the blame too. We know with KO if you're not playing D you're not playing, so if he has the athletic tools in place the staff will definitely get him to play effective D eventually. If Lubin can be 70%(or slightly less) than what Rico Gathers is for Baylor I will be very happy.
Zero. There are simply too many proven options ahead of him. If he starts we won the lottery with his scholi.
Facey could barely get on the court because he played the same position as a kid who got drafted and a fourth year senior who ended up being one of the best glue guys we've ever had at UConn. If Rock ends up starting, fantastic, but I don't get why everyone is writing Facey off so quickly.I think that this is the opposite of true. We don't have any proven, reliable frontcourt players. Brimah and Nolan played well in spurts last year, but both fouled too much to play even 20mpg while Facey could barely get on the court. If Lubin can rebound and defend while staying out of foul trouble, I'd say he has an outstanding shot to start.
Facey could barely get on the court because he played the same position as a kid who got drafted and a fourth year senior who ended up being one of the best glue guys we've ever had at UConn. If Rock ends up starting, fantastic, but I don't get why everyone is writing Facey off so quickly.
If you're going to join the conversation, actually do so. I was responding to a post that said Lubin couldn't start because there are "simply too many proven options ahead of him," which is hogwash. Stating an irrefutable fact that Facey is not proven at this level is not "writing him off," and I'll thank you to not put words in my mouth.
There are a lot of other dice combinations than just snake eyes and boxcars. Just implying.My point- since it appears Bruce does not get it- is that if Rock starts we either found a star basketball player that no other D1 schools even looked at (@ AB) or we are going to be really really awful next year. Just saying.
"I might be the shortest big we got, but I'm also the quickest, strongest and the fastest," Lubin said. "I won't have to play the five, but that just means I'll have to run a lot more..." Great attitude. Looking forward to seeing what he brings to the table.
Ignoring your douchiness for a second, he's not exactly wrong. There's necessary context to your statement that Facey "could barely get on the court".
My point- since it appears Bruce does not get it- is that if Rock starts we either found a star basketball player that no other D1 schools even looked at (@ AB) or we are going to be really really awful next year. Just saying.
Yes, and the context is that I'm responding to a poster who, so far as I can tell, referred to Facey (among others) as "proven." If he'd taken the time to read my post, he'd have realized that no, I'm not writing Facey off (though, unlike many others here, I'm not taking the fact that Giffey and Daniels existed as proof that Facey is about to be a breakout star), but to call him "proven" is ludicrous. He's the definition of unproven.