- Joined
- Aug 21, 2015
- Messages
- 4,165
- Reaction Score
- 15,904
The initials are JB and I am not talking about James Brown.Oh, don't tease
The initials are JB and I am not talking about James Brown.Oh, don't tease
She was reportedly receiving $700k collective offers mid-season, and her stock only rose during the tournament after the 41-point ISU game. I'd be shocked if U$C didn't offer her at least that.
Well of course notThe initials are JB and I am not talking about James Brown.
Why would she? Would it make you happy if she took a look at Dook and decided "nah"?
The initials are JB and I am not talking about James Brown.
My New Years resolution is I'm going to be nice on Sundays.
Did Chen look at any other schools?
Great day to be a Terp.
One thing that helps USC is that there is a clear top dog. Teams tend to have more problems when there’s a lot of new talented people and no established leader. (Eg UConn 98-99)I'd put Texas or UCONN over Southern Cal at this juncture, even if they land von Oelhoffen. USC feels a little like LSU this year, adding in a lot of pieces but developing chemistry is far from a given. And most importantly, being good on paper doesn't always translate, especially when trying to gel a lot of talent together. I think USC will be quite good and has potential but I'd put a well built Geno of Vic team ahead of them. Regardless though, it's a MASSIVE get for USC. Making the Final Four should absolutely be a goal/expectation this year.
If Frese can figure out Deberry and Poffenbarger improves her efficiency they have potential to be quite good. A lot of “ifs” though. I think they’re more in the 4-8 range though after UCLA/USC/Ohio State.So how are terp fans feeling. I think they've been almost underrated the past couple years in terms of their portal acquisitions. Anyways is this lineup top 3 in Big Ten
Shyanne Sellers
Bri McDaniels
Kaylene Smikle
Saylor Poffenberger
Amari Deberry
Iriafen Is a lot better than Morrow or Van Lith.I'd put Texas or UCONN over Southern Cal at this juncture, even if they land von Oelhoffen. USC feels a little like LSU this year, adding in a lot of pieces but developing chemistry is far from a given. And most importantly, being good on paper doesn't always translate, especially when trying to gel a lot of talent together. I think USC will be quite good and has potential but I'd put a well built Geno of Vic team ahead of them. Regardless though, it's a MASSIVE get for USC. Making the Final Four should absolutely be a goal/expectation this year.
Not Top 3, but potential to be the 4th best team who might challenge OSU for #3. Chemistry is the key word.So how are terp fans feeling. I think they've been almost underrated the past couple years in terms of their portal acquisitions. Anyways is this lineup top 3 in Big Ten
Shyanne Sellers
Bri McDaniels
Kaylene Smikle
Saylor Poffenberger
Amari Deberry
Iriafen Is a lot better than Morrow or Van Lith.
I don’t think they’ll be in the picture for the conference title either but I give Brenda a lot of credit for hitting the portal hard and recruiting some frontcourt power which should help with the Terps’ rebounding issues. Chemistry will be a major question mark but thats becoming somewhat of the norm in the portal era. This is a roster that should be super versatile and able to respond to different types of matchups which I think has been one of Maryland’s challenges over the years.Not Top 3, but potential to be the 4th best team who might challenge OSU for #3. Chemistry is the key word.
Kubek & the other 2 transfers (Te-Biasu and Toure) figure to play important roles too.
Compare them where they are now (now that one has flourished while the other moved up in competition). Who's better?Is she? It took Iriafen until her third season at Stanford to flourish, right? Morrow has done it since day one at DePaul.
Is she? It took Iriafen until her third season at Stanford to flourish, right? Morrow has done it since day one at DePaul.
Skim's got a new posting about Purdue -
Compare them where they are now (now that one has flourished while the other moved up in competition). Who's better?
Not even debatable in my mind, but obviously some disagree so I guess it is objectively debatable.Is she? It took Iriafen until her third season at Stanford to flourish, right? Morrow has done it since day one at DePaul.
Not even debatable in my mind, but obviously some disagree so I guess it is objectively debatable.
Morrow still 16pts 10 boards with sec schedule, despite being a very similar player to Reese.Compare them where they are now (now that one has flourished while the other moved up in competition). Who's better?