- Joined
- May 21, 2018
- Messages
- 224
- Reaction Score
- 501
Wow, what a zinger... Maybe UConn should have never left Atlantic Hockey...
Wow, what a zinger... Maybe UConn should have never left Atlantic Hockey...
The problem here may be that the conference is pushing them to build a facility since it was a requirement of joining. My understanding was that the conference had recently accepted the idea of just playing at XL long-term, don't know if that's still true.has anyone reached out the the AD about this mess? I know people tweet at him all the time but he seems to never use his account. I was wondering if they are just so insulated that the generally believe this is a good idea. Cause i cant seem to figure out any other explanation.
Absolutely and totally disagree with the notion that the Hockey East upgrade was poor. Cavanagh start-up is a successful venture.
I am very curious about the $22.5m Developer deal. YES, I can name 50 State University projects done this way ... and there is plenty of capacity in Municipal Finance for these deals today.
The Brand - we need to do these things very well. Yes I still believe Hockey and another ancillary sport are our POSSIBLE keys to upgrade in Conference.
You’re lawst if you think Hockey East is getting us into a P5 conference. Some of this stuff is laugh out loud funny.
Other than your personal enjoyment I’d like to hear just ONE benefit to this upgrade.
Leaving aside the wisdom of spending money that's not there, it's just a crummy deal.
QU built adjoining hockey and basketball arenas for $52 Million. Their hockey arena seats 3300, all chairbacks. For $45 Million ten years later, we should be able to get 3500-4000 and no benches.
You're correct about Hockey East doing virtually nothing for a P5 invite.You’re lawst if you think Hockey East is getting us into a P5 conference. Some of this stuff is laugh out loud funny.
Other than your personal enjoyment I’d like to hear just ONE benefit to this upgrade.
It's tricky- UConn hockey's expenses are likely down (closer travel vs AHA), revenue is up (tickets), but then you have to factor in scholarships. The one thing I'd say towards that is AHA was likely going to impose a scholarship floor anyway, so the difference is 18 vs, say, 12.
You're correct about Hockey East doing virtually nothing for a P5 invite.
According to this website: Equity in Athletics
2016 Men's Hockey Expenses: $2,953,352
2016 Men's Hockey Revenue: $3,415,625
Hockey Is a money loser for the elite hockey schools.
I know for a fact hockey is revenue-positive at BU. Or in some years they reinvest that money back into the program via facility/equipment upgrades, increased recruiting budget, coaching salary increases, etc.The elite hockey schools are literally the only people who its a money maker for, so
Only 500 chair backs is ridiculous. If you're gunna make it small, at least make it a good facility to watch a game. This is amazing. Brand new arena with bench seating. Unbelievable.