First the Werth Champions Center... a $35M practice facility for basketball.
Now, a $45M Hockey practice facility.
I was bring sarcastic, but your also bring up a good point.On the chance you aren’t being sarcastic - Werth was 100% paid for w/ private donations.
If 2,500 seats meant that there were 2,500 chair backs and the arena was state-of-the-art, that would be one thing, but this is just the Frietas Ice Forum — capacity of 2,000 and deemed not fit for the men’s hockey team to compete at all — with 500 chair backs added in.
This. It's not that I'm against a more modest rink but it seems like compromise has produced a penny wise, pound foolish decision. The UConn Blog guys get it.
Sadly apparently the UConn BOT does not read the UConn Blog.
If 2,500 seats meant that there were 2,500 chair backs and the arena was state-of-the-art, that would be one thing, but this is just the Frietas Ice Forum — capacity of 2,000 and deemed not fit for the men’s hockey team to compete at all — with 500 chair backs added in.
This. It's not that I'm against a more modest rink but it seems like compromise has produced a penny wise, pound foolish decision. The UConn Blog guys get it.
Sadly apparently the UConn BOT does not read the UConn Blog.
Benedict's follow-up interview with the Courant is even more embarrassing than this approval.
He claims part of the high cost is increasing the size of parking lots. It costs millions of dollars to cut down a few trees, put down asphalt and paint some lines?
This. I think the money is being spent in locker rooms and exercise equipment which is fine, but then it makes sense to just build them along side Freitas.There's no way Freitas couldn't be expanded to fit 500 chair backs somewhere. Absolutely no way. It's such a criminal waste of money.
What?I don’t know why I see this as some little flag saying we messed up with football and we’ll never be a football school. But maybe... we did it with basketball. And some of our other sports.
Students will go if it’s on campus. Look how many go to watch soccer consistently. People forget that student involvement is dying at at UConn not simply because of bad product but because students simply have no incentive to travel far. Not to mention the few games that manage to make it to storrs such as basketball are highlighted by big names such as USF, ECU and Tulane. I’m not against a small arena especially because students are financing most of this mess and at least the school is attempting (but failing) to build interest.There are so many things UConn could do with $45,000,000 that could improve its profile. Building the smallest arena in Hockey East to play 3 games a year in front of 30 students is not one of them. Last minute reactive decision making at its finest!
Can't listen now, anyone have a synopsis?
There is such a thing as bad publicity
U-Con