Fans see what they want to see.
UConn fans want to see flops and they see them, real or not. Physics, when a smaller object (say Loyd) runs into a larger one (say Dolson), something gives, usually it's the smaller one.
On the flip side, ND fans are convinced that virtually every screen Dolson set over 4 years was illegal. Best (most amusing) description I saw was that Jerry Kramer and Fuzzy Thurston would have been proud of many of them. For you young uns, those two were NFL Hall of Fame pulling guards on the 1960's era Green Bay Packers.
The reality is in between. Every time a player goes down is not a flop and every screen is not illegal.
When the "but, but" thread first came out I thought your first replies were spot on. Here was an OP admitting there was little complaining going on and then practically begging for it to happen. When HuskyNan combined the complaint threads together I thought to myself: "I'm not going to get sucked into that, the sky is blue and bright over Husky Nation. Why on earth is anyone fretting about ND right now?"
Ah, but here you overcome my smugness about being above it all while at the same time showing you are not as unbiased as I suspect you fancy yourself to be. Your last statement is absolutely true. However, both the flop and the screen are perfectly legal college women basketball strategies. Plus, a flop doesn't mean "no foul really occurred," rather it means "selling a foul." Sometimes no contact occurs to precipitate the flop, but usually it does, for in reality there always is much more contact than what theoretically should occur in a "noncontact" sport.
It's also true that some programs practice flopping, some don't. There's nothing wrong with practicing flopping; once again, it's currently a legal part of the game. The Duke men are famous for it; they admitted to having drills for it. In the championship game at least twice Dolson was run into very hard, hard enough to jolt and displace her. If she went down a foul certainly would have been called, but she's been trained to stand her ground and focus on the offensive set. In those same circumstances Achonwa most certainly would have gone down, because she has been trained that way instead. If you doubt that assertion, review any sample of UConn or ND games for how many times Achonwa goes down v. Dolson outside of when they go for a rebound. Once again, there's nothing wrong with Achnowa flopping, or to be trained to do so as long as that's a legal part of the game.
Our coaching staff has attempted to minimize the moving screens by Dolson. ND fans might think with little success, UConn fans might think with great success. Yet coaching to minimize illegal moving screens is different than coaching to positively reinforce legal flops. One consequence is that an impartial observer will indeed see more legal flops from someone like Achonwa than illegal moving screens by Dolson. Your attempt to make an unbiased claim smacks of just the opposite.
If you were to say instead: "Yes we flop, that's a legitimate part of the game, get over it" I would be much more sympathetic to your protest.