I was shocked that Coach Walton had Hoover bat in that situation after she struck out the previous three times against the same pitcher, and looked terrible when striking out. But I guess that is why he is a very good coach and I was sitting in my chair at home.FL with a clutch 2 out base hit wins it in the bottom of the 8th.
I was shocked that Coach Walton had Fowler bat in that situation after she struck out the previous three times against the same pitcher, and looked terrible when striking out. But I guess that is why he is a very good coach and I was sitting in my chair at home.
Looking forward to watching the games in OKC.
Hosting of the Super Regional is a strong opportunity to advance (Arizona blew it a couple years ago). It is a system that works, while there are a limited number of teams that make it to the world series over the years, the mix is different every year.Softball is more highly concentrated than even WCBB. So far with only I deciding game left (#5 FL vs. #12 TN) only one top 8 seed lost-#4 FSU to Ok State. Even If Tennessee wins, that were/are a top team. Does the hosting of the super regionals help promote this monopoly or if the games were on neutral sites would more upsets happen? The attendance has been pretty good (for softball) and this format follows the patterns of the other sports on who hosts. But yes Virginia, there is not parity in Softball.
I wonder if parity is not there due to the fact that players can transfer and don't sit out a year. Look at this year's Texas team, new Coach from Oregon and transfers followed him and had an immediate impact. Isn't OK's star pitcher a transfer (from AZ???), along with one of AL's star pitchers who transferred from Hofstra? The good teams just keep reloading due to the transfer rules.No, there isn't a lot of parity. Top half of the Big 12 and PAC, top third of the B1G, all the SEC, maybe 1/3 of the ACC plus select miscellaneous teams (often the same each year, such as ULL, James Madison, Fordham, DePaul, etc). Not so sure why the disparity - a lot of players out there. But, it is what it is.
Thanks for the comments and to be clear, I am not advocating for Neutral Sites. Attendance is important and Softball mirrors how the other team sports conduct their NCAA Championships for the most part.Hosting of the Super Regional is a strong opportunity to advance (Arizona blew it a couple years ago). It is a system that works, while there are a limited number of teams that make it to the world series over the years, the mix is different every year.
Attendance is pretty much sold out for all the regionals and super regionals - the stadiums are small, some smaller than others. Neutral sites wouldn't work at all.
No, there isn't a lot of parity. Top half of the Big 12 and PAC, top third of the B1G, all the SEC, maybe 1/3 of the ACC plus select miscellaneous teams (often the same each year, such as ULL, James Madison, Fordham, DePaul, etc). Not so sure why the disparity - a lot of players out there. But, it is what it is.
BTW, I am a huge Mike Candrea fan after having gone out to Tucson in 1989 and seen a few of his practices in February and a few games. Obviously with seeing them fairly regularly at the WCWS and his Olympic success, I always root for them 1st and foremost. Their offense was really good this year and has sustained during the 1st two sets Of playoffs. I worry that their pitching is not quite as dominant as it needs to be. It should be a good 1st game vs. Washington and I may have make a bet with @nwhoopfan ! Winner gets UCLA/Minnesota winner. Go ‘Cats!Hosting of the Super Regional is a strong opportunity to advance (Arizona blew it a couple years ago)....
Their offense was really good this year and has sustained during the 1st two sets Of playoffs. I worry that their pitching is not quite as dominant as it needs to be. It should be a good 1st game vs. Washington and I may have make a bet with @nwhoopfan !
Did I hear Danielle Lowrie doing commentary on games over the weekend?Oh, I'm not a betting man! UW fairly well stymied Arizona's hitters in a 3 game sweep in Tucson right before the end of the regular season. That kinda worries me. Not sure how many times they can beat the Cats in one year. Alvelo and Plain are both really good but on occasion I've seen each get roughed up. Not sure who will get the nod. Plain pitched a complete game last time out so probably Alvelo is up? Arizona's got a bunch of hitters that can go deep any time and UW's offense hasn't been real productive for most of the playoffs, so we'll see what happens.
Cool - we always liked Mike from afar when we were in NJ (our only ties to U of A is we moved to Tucson and they were the local school to support). For whatever it is worth, it is a nice school to follow in many ways - much nicer in those ways than Rutgers, which I follow because I am an alum (and that was my local school in NJ as well).BTW, I am a huge Mike Candrea fan after having gone out to Tucson in 1989 and seen a few of his practices in February and a few games. Obviously with seeing them fairly regularly at the WCWS and his Olympic success, I always root for them 1st and foremost. Their offense was really good this year and has sustained during the 1st two sets Of playoffs. I worry that their pitching is not quite as dominant as it needs to be. It should be a good 1st game vs. Washington and I may have make a bet with @nwhoopfan ! Winner gets UCLA/Minnesota winner. Go ‘Cats!
I was going to say the EXACT SAME THING!!!!! The guy drives me nuts. Where's Mowins, Mendoza and Michelle Smith???Really having a hard time listening to Adam Amin. Probably just me, but I think he adds nothing to these games. I prefer Eric Frede over him any time. Eric did a great job during the SEC season and the Regionals. If we can't have Beth Mowins, give me Eric.