- Joined
- Mar 2, 2018
- Messages
- 1,525
- Reaction Score
- 8,236
DI Women's Basketball Rankings - NCAA Women's Basketball NET Rankings | NCAA.com
Get NCAA women's college basketball rankings from the Associated Press, USA Today/WBCA and NCAA committee.

You need to find some targets other than Kim. Look at Texas ‘ schedule. Two quad ones NO QUAD TWOs!Even in the NET Rankings UConn has played a tougher schedule than LSU has. UConn has played only 3 teams ranked out of the Top 50. They are Dayton at #209, Ball State at #98 and Butler at #130. They have played 8 teams in the 50. They are NC St #9, Maryland #39, Minn #37, UCLA #6, Kansas #43, Texas #3, North Carolina #46 and Louisville #26.
While LSU has played only 2 teams ranked in the Top 50. They are Colorado #24 and Virginia Tech #18. They have played 11 teams ranked out of the Top 50. They are Queens U #347, MS Valley St #335, Kent St #122, S. East LA #148, TX Southern #346, Niagara #288, UVA #73, Louisiana #225, McNeese St #359, Northwestern St #268 and Coppin St #285.
There should be major penalties for teams that play out of conference schedules as bad as this. Yes LSU plays in the SEC, but currently there are only 6 teams in the SEC that are rated in the Top 50, that's including LSU. While currently there are 4 in the Big East including UConn. LSU will play South Carolina #1, Miss St #35 and Florida #49 only once, while playing TX A&M #20 and Alabama #29 twice. UConn will play Creighton #19, Marquette #32 and Seton Hall #34 two times and that is not counting the Big East Tournament.
Texas schedule is bad, but not as bad as LSU's. Texas only has one team rated at 300+ while LSU has four and that is UT Rio Grande at #310. Three of the their games were in Saint Thomas Paradise Jam which they have little control in the schedule.You need to find some targets other than Kim. Look at Texas ‘ schedule. Two quad ones NO QUAD TWOs!
Major penalties as in perhaps no better than a five seed in the ncaa tournament thus foregoing hosting the first two rounds? Many of us can hope (and if it did occur it might change Coach Mulkey’s scheduling approach) but I don’t expect it will ever happen.Even in the NET Rankings UConn has played a tougher schedule than LSU has. UConn has played only 3 teams ranked out of the Top 50. They are Dayton at #209, Ball State at #98 and Butler at #130. They have played 8 teams in the 50. They are NC St #9, Maryland #39, Minn #37, UCLA #6, Kansas #43, Texas #3, North Carolina #46 and Louisville #26.
While LSU has played only 2 teams ranked in the Top 50. They are Colorado #24 and Virginia Tech #18. They have played 11 teams ranked out of the Top 50. They are Queens U #347, MS Valley St #335, Kent St #122, S. East LA #148, TX Southern #346, Niagara #288, UVA #73, Louisiana #225, McNeese St #359, Northwestern St #268 and Coppin St #285.
There should be major penalties for teams that play out of conference schedules as bad as this. Yes LSU plays in the SEC, but currently there are only 6 teams in the SEC that are rated in the Top 50, that's including LSU. While currently there are 4 in the Big East including UConn. LSU will play South Carolina #1, Miss St #35 and Florida #49 only once, while playing TX A&M #20 and Alabama #29 twice. UConn will play Creighton #19, Marquette #32 and Seton Hall #34 two times and that is not counting the Big East Tournament.
Query: is this based on teams played at the present time? Does it include projected strength of future games such as UConn vs. SCar and Notre Dame?Among teams in the NET top 50, those with the 10 highest nonconference strength of schedule rankings are as follows:
Team (NET ranking): Nonconference strength of schedule ranking
UConn (12): #2Gonzaga (14): #15South Carolina (1): #16Kansas (43): #17Duke (28): #21Maryland (39): #23Iowa (7): #32Creighton (19): #33North Carolina (46): #36Arizona (41): #42
On the other end of the spectrum, no fewer than 11 out of the NET top 50 have a nonconference strength of schedule ranking outside the top 200:
Team (NET ranking): Nonconference strength of schedule ranking
West Virginia (31): #324TCU (22): #307Marquette (32): #305Oregon State (27): #300Washington (30): #290Minnesota (37): #256Mississippi State (35): #243Texas A&M (20): #232LSU (15): #214MTSU (50): #207Texas (4): #204
Source: NCAA Statistics
I don’t know why it’s so low. It could be worseA strength of schedule of 324??? Is that even possible for what should be a big time school? What did West Virginia do, play the Little sisters of the poor 3 or 4 times?
Based on games played. Not projected.Query: is this based on teams played at the present time? Does it include projected strength of future games such as UConn vs. SCar and Notre Dame?
The NET strength of schedule metric appears to award greater weight to games against top teams, as opposed to calculating straight averages or combined W-L percentages.I don’t know why it’s so low. It could be worse