NoPlease correct me if I am wrong.
There will be 2 final four teams coming out of Albany. One each from the 2 pods
The teams in each pod do NOT play each other in Albany...only play
teams within their pod. 4 teams in each pod.
I would assume the NCAA would try to balance the overall strength of the 2 pods.
If South Carolina is considered the best team in Albany they might well play
the 8th best team in the sweet sixteen game...and then the winner of the 4/5
game in the final 8 game. Neither of those teams would be UConn. UConn...if considered
the 3rd best.. would play the 6th best in the sweet sixteen and if advancing the winner of 2 and 7.
Very good teams...but doable.
Lots of assumptions here but the main one is just a fact.. The winner of the 'non-South Carolina"
pod will go to the final 4 without facing Carolina.
Great chart.Last big grid of the season, as I'll crop it down to preseason, beginning, mid, and then the last few rows as we go along.
View attachment 96478
Given how Oregon St has been playing, their remaining schedule also gives them a lot of opportunity to move up to a #2 seed, if not a #1 seed if they truly run the table and beat UCLA, USC, and Stanford all at home [daunting but far from unfathomable].Oregon State's Pac-12 schedule as a whole is brutal, with 10 of their 18 games against Stanford, UCLA, USC, Colorado, and Utah. And yet they're 9-3 and went 4-0 against the Mountain schools.
Their toughest road games are behind them. They get the LA schools and Stanford at home and I like their chances with how they're playing.
I keep wondering how that happened? Is that a fluke or preferential treatment? Seems unfair.
I haven't seen anything from the coaches that would indicate they are playing for the NC. I think they are going with option B on your list. They will need a real lucky draw of teams with no length to get to the final weekend this year.It will be interesting to see whether UCONN basketball has any competitive edge left at both the coaching and player level; will the Huskies reach to realize the promise of its highly touted recruits (well-above Big East threshold) or resign itself to top-20 satisfaction excused by injury and roster attrition.
LSU is in the West and SC is in the East. They will however play again in the SEC Tournament if both teams win.I don't know. It could be a fluke of a rotational plan. Or it could be designed to help the top teams achieve a better record. The conference groups schools in pairs for travel purposes, so missing UCLA also means missing USC, for example.
Note that the SEC has done the same thing. Why does SC play LSU only 1x in the regular season for the 2nd year in a row?
It's not inevitable but if we assume that the committee will try to put UConn in an Albany bracket then the odds are about 50% that it'll be SC's bracket.Meyers...I get what you are saying [I think]. My main point remains...there will be an NCAA final four team coming from Albany with the good fortune of not playing South Carolina...it will be the winner of the 4 team pod that does not
include South Carolina. I don't know whether it is inevitable that UConn is in their pod [assuming UConn wins
in Storrs]. Rankings could change....the NCAA could bump rankings up or down a bit to try and eliminate early
round conference foes....whatever strategies the NCAA thinks is appropriate....etc.
We shall see when we shall see.
You aren't a football fan are you? The SEC always protects its projected national championship contenders. (Refs too)I don't know. It could be a fluke of a rotational plan. Or it could be designed to help the top teams achieve a better record. The conference groups schools in pairs for travel purposes, so missing UCLA also means missing USC, for example.
Note that the SEC has done the same thing. Why does SC play LSU only 1x in the regular season for the 2nd year in a row?
Yea, but we were talking about this reveal.Meyers...I get what you are saying [I think]. My main point remains...there will be an NCAA final four team coming from Albany with the good fortune of not playing South Carolina...it will be the winner of the 4 team pod that does not
include South Carolina. I don't know whether it is inevitable that UConn is in their pod [assuming UConn wins
in Storrs]. Rankings could change....the NCAA could bump rankings up or down a bit to try and eliminate early
round conference foes....whatever strategies the NCAA thinks is appropriate....etc.
We shall see when we shall see.
The Top 16 wasn’t generated by Charlie Creme, it was by the NCAA committeePlebe: you are correct. There will be 4 one seeds...each regional will get 2. As of now the reveal shows South
Carolina/Stanford/Colorado and Ohio State. South Carolina a one seed to Albany....maybe Ohio State to Albany as a one
seed due to distance. We get put in the Ohio State pod with our 3 seed. Make it to the final 8 [no easy task] and we meet OSU for a final 4 berth....a huge accomplishment in itself due to our injuries.
BTW: OSU has beaten Iowa once so far...don't know if they still have a regular season game at Iowa. An Iowa/OSU Big 10 tourney ring game might well be another OSU/Iowa...high ratings coming! If we stay 3 in Albany with Carolina in the other 4 team pod, we might be facing a 2 seeded sweet 16 game with either Iowa or OSU....and a final 8 game against the other. CC is college basketball's hot topic [deservedly so]. Bring Iowa against Paige and UConn in Albany....a big deal!
BTW#2: since we are aware of the NCAA affection for money I think they would be happy to have UConn fans stay in Albany for 3 days and not one...if we get a bit of an edge somewhere with that being a factor...I'll take it.
Charlie seems to be predicting [guessing] our involvement with Carolina at this point....hope he is wrong.
This is not an excuse--it's a fact. The Talent that SITS is "almost" equal to those on the floor. Those that can't play, in area's exceeds those on the floor.It will be interesting to see whether UCONN basketball has any competitive edge left at both the coaching and player level; will the Huskies reach to realize the promise of its highly touted recruits (well-above Big East threshold) or resign itself to top-20 satisfaction excused by injury and roster attrition.
It was just how the cookie crumbled this season.I keep wondering how that happened? Is that a fluke or preferential treatment? Seems unfair.
Good point. Interesting too I just heard Dawn Staley complain about their schedule that they will be playing Tennessee again shortly, so close in time, and also maybe in their upcoming tournament. She was knocking their schedulers. You have to wonder why LSU gets a pass for two years. Something doesn’t seem right.I don't know. It could be a fluke of a rotational plan. Or it could be designed to help the top teams achieve a better record. The conference groups schools in pairs for travel purposes, so missing UCLA also means missing USC, for example.
Note that the SEC has done the same thing. Why does SC play LSU only 1x in the regular season for the 2nd year in a row?
My gut tells me some preferential treatment for Tara the year she’s going to hit some records. Maybe I’m wrong but Tara got the larger of the cookie crumbles.It was just how the cookie crumbled this season.
Each Pac-12 team plays its nearby "rival" counterpart twice each season. For the other 5 pairs of opponents, they rotate year to year as to which 3 they play twice and which 2 they play only once.
SEC has 14 teams and plays a 16-game schedule, and each team has one opponent they play twice every year. For LSU that team is Texas A&M. That leaves only 2 out of the other 12 teams that LSU plays twice in a given year, so if the rotation is done evenly they'll play a given opponent twice every 6th season.Good point. Interesting too I just heard Dawn Staley complain about their schedule that they will be playing Tennessee again shortly, so close in time, and also maybe in their upcoming tournament. She was knocking their schedulers. You have to wonder why LSU gets a pass for two years. Something doesn’t seem right.
Interesting. My gut tells me it's time to eat some brisket, but my brain and my memory tell me that Stanford has had plenty of seasons where they had a tougher-than-average P12 slate. Also, she broke the record on January 21, after taking a loss at Colorado, which tells me the conference schedule wouldn't have made more than a 1 or at most 2 week difference in the timing.My gut tells me some preferential treatment for Tara the year she’s going to hit some records. Maybe I’m wrong but Tara got the larger of the cookie crumbles.
UConn has played all those teams I want to see new matchups!