- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 2,527
- Reaction Score
- 10,947
Well, I watched him with the Bulls, and even at that age, he was the best pound for pound rebounder I've ever seen.
He was also still an elite defender. Bosh was often called soft. While Rodman was the exact opposite. Dude was incredibly strong. Hell, they even matched him up against Shaq! And Rodman could hold his own....as much as one can against Shaq.
Yes, Bosh is by far the better offensive player, so tzz's point about him being a more complete player is true. I said I'd take Rodman over him, because often times, it is more beneficial to have a player with 1 or 2 elite skills. But that's my opinion.
Rodman never made All Stars then because of his scoring, and more importantly, his antics.
I agree - he was a HOFer for a reason. My point was more that those Bulls teams were perfectly assembled as opposed to being loaded with talent. Kind of like what the Patriots have been under Belichick. They found the perfect pieces for the Triangle and to compliment Jordan's game. As I'm sure you remember, in it's heydey the Triangle was considered a pretty big advantage in an era of iso-heavy basketball. They found the right pieces for it (length, versatility, passing skills, smarts, etc) and maximized the ability of those role players.
No one called the Bulls a super team. Hell, forget today's era, those Bulls teams also had less overall talent than the Showtime Lakers, 80s Celtics or potentially the Bad Boy Pistons (who are criminally underrated from a historical perspective IMO). Those teams were all deeper and more talented than the Bulls, but the Bulls had Jordan.