NBA Finals Thread - Celtics vs Mavericks
- Thread starter temery
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,384
- Reaction Score
- 35,735
Kyrie getting absolutely killed tonight. 12 pts, 2 assists, 3 TO, 0-5 from 3, 33% from the field.
(classic jinx, I'm sure...)
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,384
- Reaction Score
- 35,735
Can always fade this guy's takes...
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,384
- Reaction Score
- 35,735
Seriously. Seems like he's trying to get them a few more reps and maybe get Tatum going, but it's not worth it. Took way too long.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 17,875
- Reaction Score
- 102,801
Stabilized as I've seen them do most of the time.
Kyrie better get Boston out of his head or else the Mavs have no chance.
Kyrie better get Boston out of his head or else the Mavs have no chance.
D
Deleted at users request
Maybe he should throw the rest of the Finals lol
D
Deleted at users request
It was guaranteed after my takes + the Drake bet
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,384
- Reaction Score
- 35,735
what a stat...
WeAreUCONN
Why So Serious ¿
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2014
- Messages
- 1,637
- Reaction Score
- 4,497
I forgot the game was on but I’ll just assume the Mavs won. If they didn’t, they’ll win the next 4.
uconnbill
A Half full kind of guy
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8,695
- Reaction Score
- 16,057
must be a Knick fan
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,515
- Reaction Score
- 24,102
What happened to Dallas tonight was what I thought would happen to them against Minnesota. As good as Luka and Kyrie are (obviously Kyrie sucked tonight), it's tough to make hay against an elite defense when you really only have two guys who can create. Luka seemed worn down from the relentless ball pressure by the time they got to the fourth quarter.
Kyrie will be better and the defense should start to look more like itself as it adjusts to how explosive Boston is. What does worry me if I'm a Mavs fan, though, is the supporting cast. Guys 3-8 did not look like they belonged on a finals' floor, and worse yet, Kidd doesn't appear to be any closer to settling on a rotation now than he was before the playoffs. Gafford's been a rock for them but he basically got played off the floor by the end of the first quarter. Lively looked like a 19-year-old. Kleber and Jones are in theory capable 3 and D guys, but as the Celtics have shown us, there's a big difference between being a 3 and D vs. being able to spread the court with five guys who can shoot and put it on the floor.
Kyrie will be better and the defense should start to look more like itself as it adjusts to how explosive Boston is. What does worry me if I'm a Mavs fan, though, is the supporting cast. Guys 3-8 did not look like they belonged on a finals' floor, and worse yet, Kidd doesn't appear to be any closer to settling on a rotation now than he was before the playoffs. Gafford's been a rock for them but he basically got played off the floor by the end of the first quarter. Lively looked like a 19-year-old. Kleber and Jones are in theory capable 3 and D guys, but as the Celtics have shown us, there's a big difference between being a 3 and D vs. being able to spread the court with five guys who can shoot and put it on the floor.
HuskyHawk
The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 34,260
- Reaction Score
- 90,652
The reality is that of the ten best players on these teams Boston probably has 7 of them.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 17,875
- Reaction Score
- 102,801
Doncic only had 1 assist tonight and the entire team only had 9. Sounds like what UConn did to teams this past season. Mavs are not winning this series playing like that.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,515
- Reaction Score
- 24,102
Yup, and it may simply be about Boston's 3-7 being that good as opposed to Dallas' being limited. Gafford, Lively, Jones, and Washington were all playing their roles at a high level coming into tonight, but the Celtics are forcing them out of their comfort zone. The only things I questioned about the Celts coming into the season were whether Porzingis could stay healthy and whether Jrue would continue to play at a high level at 34. Given that the answer to both appears to be yes, the Jrue-White-Jaylen-Tatum-Porzingis lineup has to be on a very short list of best five man units in the last couple decades. Very, very rare to put five guys out there at once who are all plus players on both sides of the floor.
A lot of one on one. That can work in spurts when you have Luka and Kyrie, but very hard to sustain over 48 minutes. It's only one game but Kidd and co. really need to spend the next two days working more off-ball movement into the offense. Boston's perimeter defenders are so good that they'll turn you over if you can't alleviate that ball pressure with screens.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 4,065
- Reaction Score
- 13,823
Pacers actually. You?
HuskyHawk
The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 34,260
- Reaction Score
- 90,652
Hauser actually making a couple of shots is a very welcome development. Lost in all the talk about the close wins vs Indiana is the fact that the best shooter on the team was ice cold. If he's close to normal all those games are more comfortable.
nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 45,602
- Reaction Score
- 37,319
With Porzingis on the floor, the Celtics are just a much better team than the Mavericks on both ends. I thought a sweep was possible with Porzingis healthy, and nothing has changed my opinion. The Celtics have 3 or 4 (depending on whether you think Holiday is still in this group) of the best 50 players in the NBA right now, and the Mavericks have 1. Porzingis played 21 minutes, all when the game was still competitive, and the Celtics looked unstoppable with him on the court.
The Celtics became the prohibitive favorite to win it all when they got Porzingis and Holiday, and nothing has changed. There are maybe 5 teams (Bucks, 76ers, Clippers, Nuggets and Timberwolves) that would have a reasonable chance of beating the Celtics if both teams were healthy, and the Celtics didn't have to play any of them this postseason, in a large part because key players on those teams couldn't stay healthy. The Mavericks are a decent team that had a decent season, and are outmatched unless someone gets hurt or the Celtics epically choke.
The Celtics became the prohibitive favorite to win it all when they got Porzingis and Holiday, and nothing has changed. There are maybe 5 teams (Bucks, 76ers, Clippers, Nuggets and Timberwolves) that would have a reasonable chance of beating the Celtics if both teams were healthy, and the Celtics didn't have to play any of them this postseason, in a large part because key players on those teams couldn't stay healthy. The Mavericks are a decent team that had a decent season, and are outmatched unless someone gets hurt or the Celtics epically choke.
nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 45,602
- Reaction Score
- 37,319
Because of Porzingis' injury issues and load management, he will never have monster stats, and he has played on mostly bad teams until now so he doesn't have the playoff heroics, but he is one of the best centers of the last 10 years. Jokic and Embiid are definitely better than Porzingis. I would probably take Adebayo or Sabonis before Porzingis for a season because of durability, but if I had to pick one player for a 7 game series, I am taking Porzingis over either of them.
Brad Stevens deserves all the credit for stealing this guy from Washington.
Brad Stevens deserves all the credit for stealing this guy from Washington.
