- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,332
- Reaction Score
- 49,219
It's like giving the entire team a redshirt year.I have it on good authority that this doesn’t work.
It's like giving the entire team a redshirt year.I have it on good authority that this doesn’t work.
It's like giving the entire team a redshirt year.
It was a good time. Helped us assess our future tailgate needs in advance. Never understood why HCRE always insisted on having it on the 1st day of fishing season. Killed any chance of any participation from Vernon residents.I used the Blue White Spring game to get the grill out and tailgate and then try and glean information about new players.
Yes the few thousand or so who go will beDozens will be disappointed
"Cole Welliver has given the defensive line a case of monster, can they tell the difference"The third string player's wet dream. #2 on depth chart transfer just before spring game and #1 gets injured. Boom, 3rd to 1st just like that.
Sounds familiar…
-> Big Ten Staffer 1: We beat a team two years ago in our stadium, and three days later, two recruiting staff members from that team were direct messaging one of our top players who, he’s such a nice kid, he came in and asked, ‘Hey, do you want me to take this to compliance, or you guys want to handle it at this point?’ So I just called up that recruiting guy and say, ‘What are you doing, dude?’ To which he quickly says, ‘Well, hey, that wasn’t me.’ I was like, ‘I have the screenshot if you’d like me to share them with you.’ <-
As of 4:12 PM Eastern, it's the lead story under "Top Headlines" but not shown with a lead-in large graphic on the NCAAF page...makes sense, as why would the total sports network want to draw negative attention to their cough, hack, wheeze darling #2 conference. I love watching this bonfire.Sounds like this should be a bigger story in general or at least plastered on ESPN's NCAAF page with a "Breaking News" banner.
ESPN is a betting service and should never be relied upon for unbiased information in a day and age when you can bet on what I had for breakfast.Sounds like this should be a bigger story in general or at least plastered on ESPN's NCAAF page with a "Breaking News" banner.
Now if Wisconsin wins that could go many ways. Either it really restricts tampering or it does nothing at all to curb tampering or somewhere in between these 2 extremes.
Would the NCAA have enough power to enforce penalties for tampering? It would have to be a larger governing NCAA body. The conferences certainly would not care because if the good players are transferring into a team in their conference why would they punish that team in their conference for getting that good player(s) even if it was through ill-gotten gains.
I know it's my vote for best fight song.On Wisconsin’s side here.
It's a good one but I personally would place it third.I know it's my vote for best fight song.
Their choices are either be a passive victim, or make some noise about it, and hope that it changes the risk reward analysis of tampering at Wisconsin.NCAA isn't going to be anything other than a passenger in this. We've moved to contract law. If these NIL/Scholarship agreements have exclusively or non-compete language then schools can go after the players. Leagues like the B1G can also freeze out agents but that's unlikely to succeed.
Without a collective bargaining agreement, I'm not sure how they go after a poaching school. In pro sports, tampering is a league issue.
Wisconsin is shouting at the moon here.
Ya have to do something, even programs from the Big and SEC are affected by this, if 1 program speaks up, perhaps the next program does as well.NCAA isn't going to be anything other than a passenger in this. We've moved to contract law. If these NIL/Scholarship agreements have exclusively or non-compete language then schools can go after the players. Leagues like the B1G can also freeze out agents but that's unlikely to succeed.
Without a collective bargaining agreement, I'm not sure how they go after a poaching school. In pro sports, tampering is a league issue.
Wisconsin is shouting at the moon here.
They already said the transfer portal doesn't matter and kids can transfer, and immediately compete without it. So I guess this boils down to if the signed document between the school and the kid actually means anything. If it does, you wonder why they wouldn't be going after the kid. As for any tampering, it's unlikely they have anything other than some hearsay, and if they do have it and expose it, then it is only a matter of time until someone alleges it against them, or any other school. It's going to be more trouble than it is worth in my opinion. To me this just feels like one of the big 2 leagues trying to flex some muscle in an effort to scare teams from the other leagues away from their players.NCAA isn't going to be anything other than a passenger in this. We've moved to contract law. If these NIL/Scholarship agreements have exclusively or non-compete language then schools can go after the players. Leagues like the B1G can also freeze out agents but that's unlikely to succeed.
Without a collective bargaining agreement, I'm not sure how they go after a poaching school. In pro sports, tampering is a league issue.
Wisconsin is shouting at the moon here.