Yeah, always something. I don't understand why they can't just give her some credit for being a great player and keep having to try to find something to criticize about her. It's bizarre. UConn and UW won't play unless it's in the Final 4, which isn't very likely. Giving her the credit she deserves does absolutely nothing to take anything away from any of UConn's great players. I just don't see why they can't do it.
Because I grew up in Connecticut and now live in Oregon, with heavy investments in both UCONN and UO wbb (and softball and track for the latter), I'd also like to believe that praising players or teams doesn't have to be a zero sum game. It's of course true that Plum isn't Maya, but that doesn't mean that Plum isn't really good, does what her team needs her to do, and is maybe even deserving of a national award
this year. And saying this isn't to take anything from Gabby, or Pheesa, or Lou, or even to suggest, for that matter, that the UCONN three don't have a higher ceiling.
The same thing also happens at times when a high school star goes elsewhere. I can remember, for example, a thread on Ionescu in which a number of posters stated that she was not the kind of team player--if a team player at all--that would be UCONN material. Well, I think the season has proved otherwise. Surely, we can try to recognize excellence in one player/place without having to deny its existence elsewhere.