- Joined
- Feb 10, 2013
- Messages
- 6,381
- Reaction Score
- 61,518
Like Gilbert & Durham?What will be most impressive is seeing how Ollie can recruit top 50 guys who don't have any prior connections to our program.
Like Gilbert & Durham?What will be most impressive is seeing how Ollie can recruit top 50 guys who don't have any prior connections to our program.
Connections make up 90% of recruitment - either geographical, coaching ties or player ties. This doesn't make KOs success any less impressive or effective
Like Gilbert & Durham?
Two things drive me crazy:
1) guys ignore that Ollie had a spat of bad luck this year. He DOES recruit well! Durham was a five star player but got injured after he committed. Sure, cal the slime ball would have revoked his scholarship, but Ollie upheld it. It may have turned some other high level big men off to uconn but I'm glad he stuck to his man.
Also lost alterique a true five star and mcds all American who we desperately needed in the backcourt.
And before larrier was injured he was popping up on first round draft projections. Guy was likely our leading scorer and maybe our best player after Adams.
2) why is recruiting guys with connections to the program bad? That's what coaches do!! Aau connections is a huge reason why killings was brought in. Good recruiters create connections with local and national programs to try and get better players to our school!!!
Don't think your post is directed at me, but I'm not ignoring the bad luck in any way whatsoever. Just saying it's important to also be able to get top players who aren't local lifelong UConn fans. Big men in particular!!! With Ollie, it appears we'll be lucky enough to always have an abundance of talented point guards. I didn't know Durham was a true 5-star before the injury, but glad to hear it.
If closing against Calipari is so easy, how come more coaches aren't doing it?
They didn't commit because they were longtime fans...that argument really grinds my gears because it cheapens the work the staff put in to get them. Do you think because Adams was a UConn fan, he was an easy get? KO was going up against Bill Self and Rick Pitino. Beating them for a recruit isn't a cakewalk.
Alright guys funs over, Stairmaster is in the thread now. See you in the next one.
Not saying they had to put less work in or that it was an "easy get," but it surely benefitted us. If Adams grew up in Kentucky or Kansas, I don't think we would have gotten him.
Not saying they had to put less work in or that it was an "easy get," but it surely benefitted us. If Adams grew up in Kentucky or Kansas, I don't think we would have gotten him.
Woah woah woah, when people said this exact same thing several times throughout the 99 page circus that was his thread they got destroyed for it, how can you make such snap judgements based on a video? I mean he is twitter followers with Oz and the UConn Compliance office .
This should be instructional to the casual fan that we need to get away from overcompensating regarding NCAA sanctions and APR nonsense. Let's start awarding scholarships again to guys who can play - not senior walk-ons guaranteed to graduate. Let's do away with this over involvement of compliance and class catalogues / schedules as part of the recruiting process. It doesn't work.
Only two things. Wait until you're on this forum as long as some of us.Two things drive me crazy:
1) guys ignore that Ollie had a spat of bad luck this year. He DOES recruit well! Durham was a five star player but got injured after he committed. Sure, cal the slime ball would have revoked his scholarship, but Ollie upheld it. It may have turned some other high level big men off to uconn but I'm glad he stuck to his man.
Also lost alterique a true five star and mcds all American who we desperately needed in the backcourt.
And before larrier was injured he was popping up on first round draft projections. Guy was likely our leading scorer and maybe our best player after Adams.
2) why is recruiting guys with connections to the program bad? That's what coaches do!! Aau connections is a huge reason why killings was brought in. Good recruiters create connections with local and national programs to try and get better players to our school!!!
Only two things. Wait until you're on this forum as long as some of us.
And yes I knew I was creating a straw man's argument that would have condemned the salient points. I had my reasons.
Just to further my point and hijack this thread so as not to bring up the other, frustration can lead to anger, which can lead to hate, which can lead to rage. And rage can lead to acts that we never would never think we could commit when we are at the frustration level. I deliberately chose that thread to over react because most of us won't head to rage over Rodney. I chose to over react to an over reaction by many. But if the stakes were more critical I have no doubt that a lot of folks who are decent would end up there. Just a caution for all of us to be alert to how easily it is to be dragged into the depths of rage.
Really liked your rebuttal about AB. I can accept that point of view with some nuances. He's not at the level of IQ as Rodney but he has developed.
And now back to Diallo. I don't think there would be nearly as much resentment if the situation was reversed between UConn and Kentucky. I'm hoping that someday it happens. For now we are holding our own against some very good programs. We still have a little bit of work to be number one but outside of the apr period we've been top ten.
I was only joking with you regarding the first statement. Sorry if it came across as anything else.I don't want to make this too long, because I'm obviously not going to change your mind.
First of all "Wait until you're on this forum as long as some of us" is just an asinine thing to say. You should know better. I've been lurking on this board for years, probably more than is healthy. It's ridiculous and ad hominem attacks like this which turn reasonable people off from this board so we end up with a bunch of JSM and Chief type characters. Being on this board for longer does not, in any way, entitle you to a better opinion than my own. This comment alone has made me lose respect for you as a poster. Up until this point you were pretty reasonable, even if I disagreed.
I know you had your reasons to create a straw man argument, but that doesn't mean those reasons make any sense if you actually want to convince people you are correct. I work in the humanities in academia; I'm certainly not an expert, but this is rhetoric 101 type thinking here.
Where is anyone talking about hate or rage towards Rodney Purvis? This is just a crazy, crazy argument you're making, man. I realize that in life, politics and prejudices can lead to anger and hate. I'm about as pragmatic a liberal as it gets. You are correct when you make this point, but the point is not applicable to this situation. Anyone who is claiming that Purvis deserves to be the first casualty in a modern-day holocaust should be removed from this board.
I mean, I don't generally read the post game threads where the wackos tend to come out, but most reasonable people (like me, I hope) are frustrated at Purvis lack of BBIQ (or whatever you want to call it) when other parts of his game have improved up until this point. As of last year, he had steadily increased his production. He's being asked to do more this year and failing to meet the challenge IMO. He's a great, great ambassador to the program, but his limitations when it comes to game time are aggravating to fans like myself. Love the kid, disappointed in the play.
bump
lol just figured that it's a remote possibility nowThat bump got me unnecessarily excited.
bump