It's clear that MLS has simplified the criteria for expansion teams - money, money and show MLS owners the money. That's it.
In MLS eyes, one guy with legitimately more massive deep pockets makes even a huuuuuger difference. However, Charlotte appears to have 2X Raleigh’s population, the Charlotte metro area DMA and population being larger than the RTP DMA, and larger growth projections may tip the MLS scale over the RTP’s upside potential and minor league success. Corporate and political influences ???I would think Raleigh over Charlotte because of soccer base. But one guy can make a huge difference.
In MLS eyes, one guy with legitimately more massive deep pockets makes even a huuuuuger difference. However, Charlotte appears to have 2X Raleigh’s population, the Charlotte metro area DMA and population being larger than the RTP DMA, and larger growth projections may tip the MLS scale over the RTP’s upside potential and minor league success. Corporate and political influences ???
I’m not sure I can quibble with their expansion plan. Yes. Deep pocket owners WITH local ties. Austin Saint Louis (legacy plus Enterprise) Sacramento all day
Cincinnati will be interesting after the first year stumble - after LAFC & Atlanta rose.
I would think Raleigh over Charlotte because of soccer base. But one guy can make a huge difference.
The Big question mark ... is Miami & Beckham. Feels flaky & Florida has had plenty of shaky franchises
That's when we'll get pro/rel!going to be fun when they stop expanding and that expansion money stops flowing in.
Yup, then MLS and existing owners may try flipping poor performing franchises (financially) to other desperate cities or new prospective owners willing to throw their wallets at ego rides.going to be fun when they stop expanding and that expansion money stops flowing in.
That's when we'll get pro/rel!
Remember, we're talking about a scenario after the valuation bubble bursts. Pro/rel might be a way for these guys to get out with something.There is no chance on earth that the ego's of MLS's millionaires/billionaires club would be able to handle religation.
This is all I needed to see : [Boston Consulting Group] recommends coaching the league’s broadcast partners to “reinforce quality in broadcasts,” even suggesting that the league might launch a national “play quality” campaign to change its perception.Inside the confidential 2016 study that provided the blueprint for MLS’s modern era
Inside the confidential 2016 study that provided the...
This is all I needed to see : [Boston Consulting Group] recommends coaching the league’s broadcast partners to “reinforce quality in broadcasts,” even suggesting that the league might launch a national “play quality” campaign to change its perception.
Since the level of play isn't going to get much better they paid millions for someone to tell them to just proclaim it better anyway. They think we're nitwits.
As the Charlotte thread went-off the rails a bit, posting this hear. The owner of the Panthers - Tepper, the Mayor of Charlotte and MLS's Garber had a press conference scheduled for this Tuesday, the 18th, for a major announcement.
I actually like Charlotte and think its turning into a great city; but, I don't like how Tepper is basically buying and MLS franchise instead of earning it. In addition, his interet in MLS is at least driven by a 'need' (he's worth $2.3 Billion) to get more publci money to renovate his NFL football stadium, which seemd to have worked as Charlotte has offered $100 Million. The Charlotte metro area does not have the legacy, grassroots support of soccer like Raleigh/Durham, which is had a professional soccer team (NC Railhawks/North Carolina FC) since 2006 and averages 4,500 fans per game. Charlotte added a USL team in 2014 (Charlotte Independence) and averages 1,600 per game. In addition, its crazy to think that this new franchise over the long-term will be able to validate playing in a NFL design stadium of 75K in terms of ticket sales AND environment within in a soccer culture that is in its infancy in a metro area that is 2/3 and less than 1/2smaller than the two 2 franchises that Tepper keep comparing to in Seattle and Atlanta (Charlotte #23 in the US with 2.569 Million, Seattle #15 with 3.939 Million and Atlanta (#9 with 5.950 Million).
As I have said before, if these jealous owners (Tepper sees Blank at Atlanta as his rival), make them earn it. Move to a European model where a new owner has to buy a lower tier team (USL) and invest in the team's players and facilities to earn their way-up to the big league via promotion. It also forces existing owners to continue to invest in their MLS team unless that want to be relegated down. That competition results in better teams, a better players, and a better experience for fans.
I think it’s funny that only 3-4 teams are turning a profit.
the study also recommended they shut down academies.
That's what will happen after the massive implosion. Soccer will become a local sport!Imagine selling US and Canadian media, Madison Avenue, etc on relegation of teams in/near the City, Chicago, LA, Houston, Bay Area, etc to low populated, backwater cities, and slow or negative growth locations. Sorrycuse, Sioux City, Saskatoon ... suhhhhh-weeeeet!
Dont see professional soccer in the US transitioning to a local nor even an entirely regional sport, but can envision a reconstituted, downsized, or newly organized top division of sorts with fewer franchises. Time will tellThat's what will happen after the massive implosion. Soccer will become a local sport!