- Joined
- Mar 28, 2019
- Messages
- 3,082
- Reaction Score
- 13,119
Still disagree. Including the word "back" can be reasonably called redundant, but it does not modify the meaning of "revert." The situation is no different than saying "progress forward." Would you argue the inclusion of "forward" changes the meaning of "progress?"Since revert means to go back "revert back" means going back back.
Similar to when a person means to say they've changed and they mean to say they've done a 180 but instead say they did a 360. You are back where you started.
Also, linguistically speaking, the 180 vs. 360 faux pas is not similar to the "revert back" scenario whatsoever.