UcMiami
How it is
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,197
- Reaction Score
- 47,324
Not sure why you would think that SDSU wouldn't get a at large bid ...Tbh I doubt SDSU would get in without an AQ. They had close losses to some ranked teams (#21 Creighton, #10 Louisville) and actually beat #24 Kansas St. On the flip side, they got blown out by SCar and Washington State. Their NET ranking is #32 and their SOS is 111. RPI is 245! My eye test tells me they are worth an at-large bid (and ESPN agrees with me! ), but I struggle to believe the committee would give it to them.
SDSU has had some success in the tourney. Back in - I believe - 2018, they made it all the way to the S16. It's a shame that that, for now at least, is probably their ceiling.
SDSU has a NET 37, RPI 38, and non conference RPI of 35 - they can't help their SOS because their conference is terrible but their non-conference RPI is 4 and they have a significant win against NET 20 RPI 26 Louisville.
The A10 has been raided a bit by other conference in the last decade - mostly the new big east. But Dayton was an at large last year and during Jabir's tenure was at large most years when they didn't get the AQ. Their conference championship years are 2012, 2017, and 2020 but made the tourney as an at large in 2010-2015, 2018, and 2022.One of the factors of the end of the old Big East Conference was a downgrading of the A10, never mind (of course) all the conference changes over the years. Before the old BE went away, the A10 was virtually always a 2 bid league and sometimes 3 bid.
What stood them in good stead in the old days was as a decent conference in the east, they played a lot of games against teams from the power conferences , and didn't always lose, for that matter. This put them a leg up on most mid-majors who either didn't play that many games against the power conferences, or were consistent losers even against the lower level teams.
I'm sure you are correct, I think it has been a number of years since they received multiple bids.