Memphis Game Thread | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Memphis Game Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
chrissaran said:
Katie Lou doesn't have to be Breanna. She'll be fine just being herself. However, for the sake of comparison, she's a better 3-point shooter and a better passer. She will never be the shot blocker that Breanna is, but she has a chance to be a dominating offensive player. I would like to see Napheesa get back on her game. Gabby, Katie Lou, Napheesa and Natalie will be key in the tournament. Saniya, if she can stay healthy, will also help. Natalie is the big body that will give Breanna and Morgan rest and keep them from getting pounded. The others give them the depth they need to wear other teams down.
Expand ...
I didn't think Natalie had her best game tonight. However, I think she'll be ticked off and come out like gangbusters next game. She's still a young player.
 
Sluconn Husky said:
You need a lesson in objective analysis which includes less emotion.
Expand ...
You need to drop your anti-Katie Lou bias. The kid improved exponentially today.

And fandom is all about emotion. I love this team, warts and all. I see the warts but trust the coaching staff to either cover them up or correct them.
 
.-.
HuskyNan said:
You need to drop your anti-Katie Lou bias. The kid improved exponentially today.
Expand ...

I have no anti-KLS bias and my comment had nothing to do with her performance today. Again, you decide to emote and get upset over nothing. The initial assertion that she's a better passer and 3-pt shooter at this time than Breanna Stewart is demonstrably false.
 
Nice post-game interview from Mo. Apparently there was a Mo fan club waiting for her after the interview.
 
Sluconn Husky said:
I have no anti-KLS bias and my comment had nothing to do with her performance today. Again, you decide to emote and get upset over nothing. The initial assertion that she's a better passer and 3-pt shooter at this time than Breanna Stewart is demonstrably false.
Expand ...
Read the last few game threads. Several player had off games, yet KLS got the most of your scorn.

Frankly, I didn't miss you in this thread. If you decided not to participate in any more game threads, I'd be OK with that.
 
See, Eric (wherever in the world you are) there is ALWAYS something to deplore, if only you look hard enough.
 
.-.
Sluconn Husky said:
People see what they want to. Case in point.
Expand ...

Don't claim to have the market cornered on objective logical observation when that simply isn't true. You have said yourself in defending some of your negative remarks that they were made in the "Heat" of the game. Wouldn't that indicate an emotional response to things happening in a close game? I mean it's OK for that to happen sometimes, but don't declare that your always calm, cool and collected.
 
Sluconn Husky said:
I have no anti-KLS bias and my comment had nothing to do with her performance today. Again, you decide to emote and get upset over nothing. The initial assertion that she's a better passer and 3-pt shooter at this time than Breanna Stewart is demonstrably false.
Expand ...
KLS is an exceptional passer....and while Stewie has made strides this year in that part of her game KLS is averaging twice as many assist per game than Stewie did freshman year and KLS has a 2.2 A/T ratio while Stewie had a .6 her freshman year...we have very reason to believe that KLS game, while different from Stewies, could be as equally exciting
 
HuskyNan said:
Read the last few game threads. Several player had off games, yet KLS got the most of your scorn.
Expand ...

Scorn? Yes, I pointed out in the last game how I wished she would be shooting like SF's freshmen. Some scorn. I should mention the off games of other players? That would make you happy? Somehow I don't think so.

HuskyNan said:
Frankly, I didn't miss you in this thread. If you decided not to participate in any more game threads, I'd be OK with that.
Expand ...

Is that a threat or a hope? Your post near the end seemed to indicate I was on your mind. Sorry for that being the case. Next time someone suggests something like Ekmark being a better athlete than Bria Hartley, and then someone else objects, I hope you are as demonstrative in your outrage.
 
.-.
HuskyNan said:
I didn't think Natalie had her best game tonight. However, I think she'll be ticked off and come out like gangbusters next game. She's still a young player.
Expand ...
I am concerned about Natalie HOPE I am incorret
 
Blueballer said:
You have said yourself in defending some of your negative remarks that they were made in the "Heat" of the game. Wouldn't that indicate an emotional response to things happening in a close game?
Expand ...

Where are the negative remarks? There's a difference between venting during a game and making a rebuttal to a comment about player comparisons. I didn't post during the game and have rarely done so this season.
 
Sluconn Husky said:
Scorn? Yes, I pointed out in the last game how I wished she would be shooting like SF's freshmen. Some scorn. I should mention the off games of other players? That would make you happy? Somehow I don't think so.

Is that a threat or a hope? Your post near the end seemed to indicate I was on your mind. Sorry for that being the case. Next time someone suggests something like Ekmark being a better athlete than Bria Hartley, and then someone else objects, I hope you are as demonstrative in your outrage.
Expand ...
As much as I admire a healthy dose of erudite disdain, I must point out I haven't been particularly obscure. You are almost single-handedly making the game threads unreadable for a number of posters. Many posters, actually. Majority rules here.
 
rugbymate said:
KLS is an exceptional passer....and while Stewie has made strides this year in that part of her game KLS is averaging twice as many assist per game than Stewie did freshman year and KLS has a 2.2 A/T ratio while Stewie had a .6 her freshman year...we have very reason to believe that KLS game, while different from Stewies, could be as equally exciting
Expand ...

KLS is a good passer. That has been noted by many. Stewart is a terrific passer, even more so since she's less of a guard then a player like Samuelson. Passing is probably Stewart's second-best skill.
 
.-.
GREAT retrospective on SNY about the "95" Championship team. REALLY Good to watch!
 
HuskyNan said:
As much as I admire a healthy dose of erudite disdain, I must point out I haven't been particularly obscure. You are almost single-handedly making the game threads unreadable for a number of posters. Many posters, actually. Majority rules here.
Expand ...

Is that like the guy who attacked me with the conspiracy theory involving AAU coaches and claimed others were privately in agreement with him over his delusion? Strangely, I never saw any reprimand for that nonsense.

The folks who can't read the threads due to my occasional participation don't put my posts on ignore or simply bypass them which would seem to solve the problem. I don't really think this boils down to game threads, but I won't post in them if that will make everyone happier.
 
Sluconn Husky said:
Is that like the guy who attacked me with the conspiracy theory involving AAU coaches and claimed others were privately in agreement with him over his delusion? Strangely, I never saw any reprimand for that nonsense.

The folks who can't read the threads due to my occasional participation don't put my posts on ignore or simply bypass them which would seem to solve the problem. I don't really think this boils down to game threads, but I won't post in them if that will make everyone happier.
Expand ...

I contemplated that and used to put people on "ignore" sometimes. But then I thought, the heck with that. If I think you're out to lunch with some of the negative remarks I'm going to disagree with you. This is a our community and I don't want to see it turn into a "Chicken Little" board. I don't want to have to stick my head in the sand and ignore it. There may be people who have stopped posting because of the negative postings. It shouldn't be that way. We have an undefeated team for goodness sakes. We should savor and enjoy these times.
 
Blueballer said:
I contemplated that and used to put people on "ignore" sometimes. But then I thought, the heck with that. If I think you're out to lunch with some of the negative remarks I'm going to disagree with you. This is a our community and I don't want to see it turn into a "Chicken Little" board. I don't want to have to stick my head in the sand and ignore it. There may be people who have stopped posting because of the negative postings. It shouldn't be that way. We have an undefeated team for goodness sakes. We should savor and enjoy these times.
Expand ...

Maybe they shouldn't have been posting in the 1st place. You (not "you" blueballer) can't be that thin-skinned.

I like slu's posts. I like nan's posts. I like this site. I don't see why anyone should get so upset as long as there are no personal insults. I guess to each his own . . .
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,930
Messages
4,545,411
Members
10,426
Latest member
kmbazz15


Top Bottom