- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 795
- Reaction Score
- 2,638
She's leaving school early to play professionally. I think it's a safe bet that money was a factor.
Not in the WNBA, it isn't.
She's leaving school early to play professionally. I think it's a safe bet that money was a factor.
Not in the WNBA, it isn't.
Well she was not working for free. She was being compensated.Sure, but it's obviously a factor in Loyd's decision, so why is she wrong for leaving early? She's old enough, and there's only so much time you can earn money as an athlete. Why spend that time working for free for Muffet McGraw, of all people?
Wow!!!.Sounds like sour grapes o me......But its OK for coaches to walk away and not look back...She can always come back and finish her degree..Muffett...Please move on
The announcers at the game felt McGraw gave up too soon toward the end;not fouling, maybe she felt the same, and said seeya...
The key here is : the agent named in the article.A little more insight is provided in this article.
http://www.ndinsider.com/basketball...cle_b9cacab6-e312-11e4-a4fa-e78df787afea.html
Apparently, Loyd is not going to be an easy interview.
I think they ended up enjoying their time overseas. Kayla had her season stopped short because of an injury.Those of you who just see the $ to be made overseas should read the following article about a pair of former WBB players, one a Husky and one a Domer:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/11/s...le-the-blues-in-first-season-abroad.html?_r=0
Not exactly a glamorous life. And they at least can keep each other company.
Hopefully Loyd consulted with Diggins, McBride, whoever to get as much info as possible before making her decision.
I'm not a Muffet fan, but, I don't see "out of touch and reactionary" in her comments. And, I find a bit of a contradiction in saying "It's not Notre Dames choice, but rather the individual players", and then saying "Muffet should not comment on players decision to become professionals, but rather support them unconditionally."Lol muffed out. She is out of touch and reactionary towards her players.
There should've been more conversations about this draft possibility prior to this year, initiated by the coaching staff. It's not notre dames choice, but rather the individual players by deadline.
Muffet should not comment on players decision to become professionals, but rather support them unconditionally.
To be the devil's advocate here: Looking at it from Muffet's POV- she's lost the only chance she had to be competitive with UCONN and probably all other FF teams next season. If I were in her shoes I'd be pretty P'ed off about it. I would personally be very bitter especially when Jewell had assured me otherwise before the fact.
But life goes on...
Sorry - just not true - she was receiving compensation to the tune of $62,461 (tuition room and board at ND) plus full time access to a personal trainer and state of the art training equipment. and I am pretty sure free access on demand to academic tutors, nutritionists, sports psychologists, guidance counselors, etc. You may think that other stuff is not important, but most pros are paying out of their own pocket for some combination of all those things. And agents don't come cheap either - not sure what they take from WNBA players, but it is typically 10+% of gross pay.Anything she makes in the WNBA is more than what she's getting to play for free in college, and that's not even counting the substantial outlay she could probably get from a European team.
If I could reward this thought with three "likes" I would do so, as should anyone who, like me, has footed the bill for a few college tuitions. The full scholarship deal is hefty compensation, and, irrespective of our mutual admiration or disdain for Notre Dame, it's a pretty elite academic institution from which to receive a free ride...more, much more, than quid pro quo! If one of my own kids, for whom I'd provided that ride, elected to blow off his or her Senior year, I'd be somewhat apoplectic. Further, while I understand all the comments about the men's game and the women's being very different insofar as the lure and magnitude of future professional compensation is concerned, I have to admit that I don't feel all that differently about the men. I guess I just hate the whole one-and-done culture....or two-and-done....or three. The players on both sides are more-than-handsomely compensated for their skills.Well she was not working for free. She was being compensated.
I agree.
Although being completely sympathetic and non-judgemental about her remarks (in the other thread),
there is surely some disconnect between the staff and the team now that two star players have opted to leave during the same season (one changed her mind).
Or is it possible that campus life there is not quite as bucolic as it is cranked up to be.
I haven't seen many reactions from former teammates…Achonwa seemed understanding, Devereaux Peters most surely not.
I agree to an extent. I have no problem with the coming "stipends" in addition to scholarships. The players (students) do sacrifice a lot for their dream. Not easy juggling academics and Div 1 BB. A lot is expected out of them.If I could reward this thought with three "likes" I would do so, as should anyone who, like me, has footed the bill for a few college tuitions. The full scholarship deal is hefty compensation, and, irrespective of our mutual admiration or disdain for Notre Dame, it's a pretty elite academic institution from which to receive a free ride...more, much more, than quid pro quo! If one of my own kids, for whom I'd provided that ride, elected to blow off his or her Senior year, I'd be somewhat apoplectic. Further, while I understand all the comments about the men's game and the women's being very different insofar as the lure and magnitude of future professional compensation is concerned, I have to admit that I don't feel all that differently about the men. I guess I just hate the whole one-and-done culture....or two-and-done....or three. The players on both sides are more-than-handsomely compensated for their skills.