- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 54,507
- Reaction Score
- 203,520
35 assists and 6 turnovers against Arizona, Illinois, Florida, and Texas.Do people already forget the beginning of the season?
He totally sucks.
35 assists and 6 turnovers against Arizona, Illinois, Florida, and Texas.Do people already forget the beginning of the season?
You have it wrong. The posters here who thought that Malachi Smith is a decent back up point guard, but not better than Silas, are the ones who are questioning whether or not Millender MAY be better than Smith if given a chance.We went from Malachi should start over Demary to is Millender better than Malachi. So by transitive property Millender is better than Demary?
This board never ceases to amaze me.
Malachi had a few good games, including one vs. Illinois, and people are anointing him the best backup PG in the country.We went from Malachi should start over Demary to is Millender better than Malachi. So by transitive property Millender is better than Demary?
This board never ceases to amaze me.
LOL. Yeah, Malachi is a ball pounder. He's more of the old school PG.
Might help Smith to vary his pace, seems to always play to a long shot clock, but the coaches seem OK with this pace.
The point is both sides are stupid. Millender wasnt even the pg for IU Indy last year. He’s not better than Malachi. He was brought in as a practice body.You have it wrong. The posters here who thought that Malachi Smith is a decent back up point guard, but not better than Silas, are the ones who are questioning whether or not Millender MAY be better than Smith if given a chance.
Malachi had a few good games, including one vs. Illinois, and people are anointing him the best backup PG in the country.
If we didn’t have Silas we’d be cooked.
Millender started 25 games for them last year, shot almost 44% from 3 and ranked #12 in the nation in assist to turnover ratio. I’m not saying he’s necessarily better than Smith, but it wouldn’t be a terrible thing if he got more than a couple spot minutes a game. He seems more than capable.The point is both sides are stupid. Millender wasnt even the pg for IU Indy last year. He’s not better than Malachi. He was brought in as a practice body.
It’s the classic mistake that fans make every year. That the guy that doesn’t play is better than the guy that does. It’s dumb. If Alec were indeed possibly better than Malachi Hurley would play him
His IU Indy team lost to Robert Morris by 53 points last season and Millender had 0 points and 1 assist in 26 minutes in the game.Millender started 25 games for them last year, shot almost 44% from 3 and ranked #12 in the nation in assist to turnover ratio. I’m not saying he’s necessarily better than Smith, but it wouldn’t be a terrible thing if he got more than a couple spot minutes a game. He seems more than capable.
All of that can be true. He wasnt their pg. And he did that at IU Indy, How many guys do you expect in the rotation? Right now we have 9 guys who get minutes. All of whom are better than Millender.Millender started 25 games for them last year, shot almost 44% from 3 and ranked #12 in the nation in assist to turnover ratio. I’m not saying he’s necessarily better than Smith, but it wouldn’t be a terrible thing if he got more than a couple spot minutes a game. He seems more than capable.
Our point guard depth is what it was always supposed to be. Silas and Malachi.I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m saying that none of us know, while obviously the coaching staff agrees with you.
But regardless of what the coaching staff thinks, or any boneyard poster, Smith’s play on the court is not convincing.
And if Millinder is worse, then that means that UConn‘s heralded depth at point guard is actually a mirage. Because if Silas goes down, Smith would not be capable of leading UConn through the tournament at the point guard position. It would be a worse situation than last year playing with a hobbled Hassan Diarra.
Is this our mojo fountain this year?
He actually brought this up in post-game presser. He said he prides himself on being a tough defender as a bigger guard but acknowledged that occasionally he gets beat and has to learn to be able to live with it rather than committing what I would call the "frustration foul."Silas is such a good defender with his feet and positioning, I dont know why reaches in so much for the “highlight play” on defense. If he gambled less and played more solid and walled up he wouldn't be in foul trouble every game. It’s a bad habit that the staff has to continue to correct. Its one thing to gamble if you’re a bad defender, but his defensive play for 95% of the possession is so good.
We’re lucky we didn’t get shot clock violations. Taking way too long to get organized or are they just getting some rest? Either answer isn’t good.Getting to 80 points is a struggle.
We’re lucky we didn’t get shot clock violations. Taking way too long to get organized or are they just getting some rest? Either answer isn’t good.
Positives I saw were Stewie's impact/energy in the paint-Had some excellent entry/dump passes to the Bigs and played tough D. Thought Solo did a nice job on the boards for a guard. Good to see.
I'm sure Danny will have them focused vs Friars. Gotts bring the energy Wed.
That’s fair. The 200s are never the problem though. The average age in the lower bowl must’ve been retirees.I was there. Not close to a wine and cheese guy in the 200's. The game had no flow. Refs called over 20 fouls in the first half. There were no runs and very little competitiveness in the second half. Not a high energy game at all.
Did y listen to Hurleys post game presser. Was being snarky saying he thinks Silas like being in foul trouble. LolSilas is such a good defender with his feet and positioning, I dont know why reaches in so much for the “highlight play” on defense. If he gambled less and played more solid and walled up he wouldn't be in foul trouble every game. It’s a bad habit that the staff has to continue to correct. It’s one thing to gamble if you’re a bad defender, but his defensive play for 95% of the possession is so good.
The box score line of six points, four rebounds and three assists in 21 minutes does not do him justice. It seems like he has a few minutes where he's everywhere, often bringing critical momentum.Stewart had a good game with blocks, assists and rebounds
I'm in the lower bowl and of retiree age. The crowd and I have no problem getting loud when the team is playing well. The game just wasn't conducive for getting the crowd going.That’s fair. The 200s are never the problem though. The average age in the lower bowl must’ve been retirees.
He just needs the ball. It's constantly annoying that our PGs just ignore him when he's open and are overly focused on getting the ball to AK or Solo. Stew has shown some real ability to create at the foul line, like Daniel Hamilton lite and we need to get him the ball. He keeps making good cuts off of screens to get to that open spot and rarely gets the ball. From that position he can feed the 5, distribute to the shooters outside or just score himself.Stewart is finally making quick decisions consistently. IMO he's never had an energy problem. He had some shot making problems but his biggest issue was that he was hesitating on what to do just a bit too long.