- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 20,210
- Reaction Score
- 115,896
I would not include Ball in that group. He's shooting 84% from the line. He shot 84% last year also.Smith, Ball and Reibe need to spend hours practicing FTs.
I would not include Ball in that group. He's shooting 84% from the line. He shot 84% last year also.Smith, Ball and Reibe need to spend hours practicing FTs.
They ran pretty good offense, just missed a lot of wide open (wide wide open) threes, missed alot of FTs, missed a bunch of point blank shots too. Basically just couldn’t make a shot.The offense still looks a little rough.
PC could be interesting, coming in with some confidence and into their Super Bowl.Positives I saw were Stewie's impact/energy in the paint-Had some excellent entry/dump passes to the Bigs and played tough D. Thought Solo did a nice job on the boards for a guard. Good to see.
I'm sure Danny will have them focused vs Friars. Gotts bring the energy Wed.
Shouldn’t a streaky team sometimes be top 10%.Streaky shooting team.
I'd have to watch again but it didn't feel like Braylon's 6 misses were wide open. At least a couple seemed forced and the one from the logo was open for a reason since defenders don't typically pick up their man out at that distance.I thought it was funny Braylon missed 6 wide open ones then the 1 that he hit was a contested sidestep pull-up
Did you miss the Xavier game?Shouldn’t a streaky team sometimes be top 10%.
Hurley essentially said as much. My theory - the summer reshuffle of the “forever seats” brought more of a wine and cheese crowd to the front.i get our fans weren't loud but these last few games have been very meh to get the crowd going anyway
Mullins takes a lot of bad shots.
LOL. Yeah, Malachi is a ball pounder. He's more of the old school PG.Dude could Schhitt out a diamond with the way he is pressing.
Is Smith way better than Millender?Because he's a practice level player and we have two point guards who are way better than him.
Might help Smith to vary his pace, seems to always play to a long shot clock, but the coaches seem OK with this pace.LOL. Yeah, Malachi is a ball pounder. He's more of the old school PG.
Ok. 1 game. Did y miss the rest of the games?? I think against non cupcakes they’ve had 2 games over 40%. And 1 game under 30 %.Did you miss the Xavier game?
You said “sometimes” and I showed you evidence of sometimes. That by definition makes them streaky. Silas, AK, Mullins, and Ball are all good 3 point shooters by skill set. I don’t need a 12 game sample size of numbers to tell me that.Ok. 1 game. Did y miss the rest of the games?? I think against non cupcakes they’ve had 2 games over 40%. And 1 game under 30 %.
Our backup C is 3rd in 3pt % and our sharpshooter is under 30%. We have 1 high volume shooter over 40%. In These don’t sound like numbers for a good 3pt shooting team imo. Being #102 in 3 pt % for a team that was supposed to be 4 out isn’t very good.
Actually 1 game is an anomaly. Streaky is 1/2 up 1/2 down. They have been mostly poor. If they were streaky they wouldn’t be sub 100 3pt %.You said “sometimes” and I showed you evidence of sometimes. That by definition makes them streaky. Silas, AK, Mullins, and Ball are all good 3 point shooters by skill set. I don’t need a 12 game sample size of numbers to tell me that.
Okay so you are arguing they’ve only shot good in one game. Got it.Actually 1 game is an anomaly. Streaky is 1/2 up 1/2 down. They have been mostly poor. If they were streaky they wouldn’t be sub 100 3pt %.
I was there. Not close to a wine and cheese guy in the 200's. The game had no flow. Refs called over 20 fouls in the first half. There were no runs and very little competitiveness in the second half. Not a high energy game at all.Hurley essentially said as much. My theory - the summer reshuffle of the “forever seats” brought more of a wine and cheese crowd to the front.
Is Smith way better than Millender?
Another capable ball-handler, looks like a decent defender, good FT shooter, and 5 fouls to give!He has not played a meaningful minute in a UConn uniform. All cupcakes or end of blowouts. What is it you all think he will bring to the table at the obvious expense of vastly superior players? Make it make sense.
YesIs Smith way better than Millender?
I thought the Seb guard looked pretty good on his one jumper - I think he needs more time too.We went from Malachi should start over Demary to is Millender better than Malachi. So by transitive property Millender is better than Demary?
This board never ceases to amaze me.
Are you claiming Hurley knows more than we do??I think it is pretty obvious that Coach Hurley and the staff believes Smith is.
Honestly, I'll take a Solo who is a mid-30's shooter from 3 if it means all other facets of his game are improved over a 1-dimensional 41% 3-pt shooter.I thought Solo had a great game but I'm starting to think he is just never going to be an efficient 3 point shooter this year. I love his ability to drive the ball, midrange and floater and usually make free throws. His defense has improved as well. He looks like our best player most nights. If he was shooting 40% from 3 he would be an All-American and in discussion for POY. But I won't be greedy. Take what I can get with Solo. Glad he's a Husky!
Is Smith way better than Millender?
Smith doesn’t facilitate the offense. He bogs it down where we have to throw up a last second shot. He drives to the hoop and gets blocked consistently. He can’t make free throws. Occasionally he’ll make a good assist for a bucket but he doesn’t focus on doing that. He’s a decent shooter at the point guard position. But as for running UConn’s offense, it’s obvious he doesn’t actually have a clue of
how to do it.
I like the energy he brings, I like the competitiveness he brings, I like his shooting, I don’t like that he doesn’t facilitate the offense. And the coaching staff either realizes that he doesn’t have the capability to run the offense, or for some reason they simply don’t care to coach him up to play point guard the way it should be played.