- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
- Messages
- 698
- Reaction Score
- 829
Thank you, I just got a hand me down cell from my wife and I don't text yet, or maybe never.IDK = I don't know
i.e. ~ response I get from sons a lot of the time when I text them with a question...
Thank you, I just got a hand me down cell from my wife and I don't text yet, or maybe never.IDK = I don't know
i.e. ~ response I get from sons a lot of the time when I text them with a question...
What is the ROI of those channels and how do they compare to other channels?
I don't know, so I'm not going to be an A##hole and pretend I do.
Maybe HDF is better than steve jobs. or maybe not.
I just can't judge.
And trying to judge based on boneyard posting is beyond stupid.
You really aren't helping anything here either dude. Just saying. Fans care, and we want to see the program grow.
what jmoney pointed out is basic advertising. There are multiple aspects to marketing, and depending on who you talk to or read, you get essentially 4 (maybe 5) different approaches - to help reach a goal of some sort that is defined as marketing, and you can't actually market something, if you don't have some kind of goal - product/sales, or whatever that you need your target population to commit to investing in. Marketing - it's actually very much the same as recruiting. It's sales. You can't do sales, unless you can close the deal, and youcan't close the deal, if you can't get the customer through the door, and can't get the customer through the door, if you don't know who your customers are. IMNSHO, the marketing department at an athletic department has but one goal - ticket sales - and achieving 100% capacity ticket sales for your events.
Advertising, usually is the most costly aspect of marketing approach, with least actual tangible return on what you invest and advertise and intend to close a deal on. It's highly unlikely that a commuter on a Metro North train, will actually buy a ticket to an Army (or UCONN) football game, after seeing the paid advertisement (and 'paid' is the key word).
But while costly, with little actual return, investing in a strong advertising presence for your target population of whom you would like to complete some kind of sale, is a very, very important part of successful marketing.
The key questions - that IDK, a guy like me would like to know - is how much money is allocated for the marketing department budget, and how is that money being spent. Because aside from advertising (which usually is most costly, there are things like personal contact, publicity (different from advertising) and promotion that EACH should be approached specifically and indpendantly to your target population.
There are many times, when I wonder if we even have a specific target population identified that we want to sell tickets to, let alone well thought out, methods of generating sales in that target population.
Once again - winning - fixes everything, and so does developing group sales, corporate sponsorship type sales (Lew Perkins) because you can be incompetent at marketing to a large population of people with ticket sales, and still sell out, when you win enough and you can get enough big companies to invest in tax breaks.
We're all a##holes, because we would like to see UConn promoted like every single other university and pro sports team in America. Got it, lol.
You really do seem like a truly miserable person, seek therapy if the boneyard pisses you offs this much, in fact I think I saw a bill board with a number you could contact....
But I do know that it's easy to talk out of your and pretend you know. That's why the boneyard exists, after all.
Beg to differ, I saw the ad and thought same thing as the original poster. My buddy (who played football at Penn, from Seattle orignally) immediately looked up the website on his IPAD and said, "Jeez they're playing Stanford. I have to take my kids to that." Proves two things, marketing works and big brand names matter.
Did he actually buy the tickets on the IPAD? If so - the advertisement far exceeded what could be expected IMNSHO. If he didn't buy the ticket, the advertisement did exactly what it was designed to and got the guy directly to the ticket window. We have an issue with our ticket website, because it's not easily keyed in. . It got the guy to the ticket window.
www.ArmyGameDay.com
very easy.
http://www.uconnhuskies.com/tickets/ticket-center.html
Not so easy, and look at the website - compare them.
FWIW: I've said this already, it's only very recently that I've even seen a direct link to a ticket buying window for UCONN football online. Now that we've got it, it's time to make it work better.
http://www.uconnhuskies.com/gameday/
THis website link is something attractive that might actually help close the deal on selling tickets, other than the robotic ugly website that we've got, and maybe we could steal the idea and buy the domain www.uconngameday.com.
Advertising (paying) for ads, with as easy a possible link to the ticket buying window is smart business. Nobody every accused the USMA of having people of low intelligence though. Bad football, yes. BUt they tend to have people that can organize and plan to achieve an objective and do it well.
Right. We don't see the data. But it feels wrong. It feels like they aren't doing enough.
It isn't much different than our new floor.
My point was the fan engagement and public voting process
... and both websites are through CBS Interactive - different feel though.
Right. We don't see the data. But it feels wrong. It feels like they aren't doing enough.
They aren't doing enough. All I can look for is progress. Right now, based on this single thing, I want to see the ticket buying window online for UConn football changed and made easier to access.
www.uconngameday.com. It's an open domain. If some marketing genius in Storrs is reading this right now.
I have no idea what CBS interactive is, and what the significance of the websites both going through it is. Can you explain?

Advertising on sports TV and Radio channels (SNY, NESN, YES Network, NBC, CBS and Fox sports channels, reaches at least a general population of your target audience...Sports fans. Advertising during sporting events reasonably ensures that the audience is watching live and won't fast forward through commercials (not saying it can't be done), as it is difficult to record a game and avoid updates. Blanket advertising is indeed an inexact science, but "Hour long" tv shows are only 48 minutes of actual air time. "1/2 hour shows" are only 22 minutes. Gov. Roland works only 4 minutes out of every ten. There has to be a reason why stations reduce production like that and companies pay so much for ad time. It has to work to some degree, regardless of budget, doesn't it?What is the ROI of those channels and how do they compare to other channels?
I don't know, so I'm not going to be an A##hole and pretend I do.
Maybe HDF is better than steve jobs. or maybe not.
I just can't judge.
And trying to judge based on boneyard posting is beyond stupid.
Right. But I find it funny that their fans ended up with something pretty similar to ours, and ours was panned as foolish by HFD and others because fans will hate it.
Ok. Good.
Would you go to a DR. who says "I feel lke there is something wrong. Let's do surgery" or would you prefer one who runs tests and actually knows?
Or a nuke engineer who says "I feel this is enogh plutonium" or one who does the math?
This is like people reading the boneyard and thinking they can game plan Cincy based on the Cincy/RU game thread. There is a reason coaches watch the film and pretty much ignore game threads.
My point: I work with direct marketing. I know all about running tests, ROI, etc. Of course that's how you do it. But it seems to me based on a LOT of things I've seen from the school that this isn't happening. If it is, and they have decided there is no positive ROI advertising that can be done to support the team. Meaning that we have a &% product and we are doomed, or they aren't doing it right. Said another way - I know how to do the math, and it doesn't appear to me that anyone up there is doing it.
I had another conversation over their web properties with a couple of the Foundation folks, and I asked them if they studied clicks / dropoffs / user actions / heat maps on the donation pages. Then I asked why SCSU takes recurring donations on their site and UCONN doesn't. SIMPLE stuff. They looked at me like I was Einstein (which I'm not) or Al Gore (like I invented the internet - which I didn't). I'm a middle aged finance guy that started working in a tech B2C company 20 months ago and it is glaringly obvious to me that they don't know what they are doing up there on many levels.
So if I say it "feels" wrong...I'm not completely making ^%@ up.
My point: I work with direct marketing. I know all about running tests, ROI, etc. Of course that's how you do it. But it seems to me based on a LOT of things I've seen from the school that this isn't happening. If it is, and they have decided there is no positive ROI advertising that can be done to support the team. Meaning that we have a &% product and we are doomed, or they aren't doing it right. Said another way - I know how to do the math, and it doesn't appear to me that anyone up there is doing it.
I had another conversation over their web properties with a couple of the Foundation folks, and I asked them if they studied clicks / dropoffs / user actions / heat maps on the donation pages. Then I asked why SCSU takes recurring donations on their site and UCONN doesn't. SIMPLE stuff. They looked at me like I was Einstein (which I'm not) or Al Gore (like I invented the internet - which I didn't). I'm a middle aged finance guy that started working in a tech B2C company 20 months ago and it is glaringly obvious to me that they don't know what they are doing up there on many levels.
So if I say it "feels" wrong...I'm not completely making ^%@ up.
FWIW: The way the online systems work with donations and such has also improved dramatically in the last year or two. It's still got a long way to go though. The only real fear I have about all this stuff, is the "we've got it now, it's good enough" syndrome. Just because we have the ability to do things now (regardless of whether or not it should have been done long ago or not), does not make things ok. It's got to continue to be pushed to get better.
For that - we need to find ways to hold people accountable.
Exactly. I'd take that job and ask for a cut of increased donations. I'd make a mint. Public sector incentives for employees (longevity, security, benefits) don't lend themselves to success in the same way the private sector handles these things. And for a LARGE portion of the education process, this is appropriate. But not when it comes to marketing / fundraising / etc. They need to be run like businesses and the people who run them need to be held accountable like private sector employees are.

There has to be a reason why stations reduce production like that and companies pay so much for ad time. It has to work to some degree, regardless of budget, doesn't it?
Right. But I find it funny that their fans ended up with something pretty similar to ours, and ours was panned as foolish by HFD and others because fans will hate it.
Amen brother
These are the kinds of things that well..... say - a person like Susan Herbst - needs to hear while sitting in a VIP box at a football game........![]()

The second fastest way to waste money in marketing is to do something just because someone else is doing it.