Depending on how Indiana does in the B1G tournament, Duke is a 4 to 5 seed. I think if Indiana wins, that gets them to 4...maybe 3 seed if things break well. If Indiana is out early, their a 5 seed that people don't really want to play.EPIC choke job by Duke in the 2nd half. Lost in OT to Notre Dame.
Go Tennessee, up by 1 over Vandy. Can Rick Barnes coach them home? Is that asking for a miracle?
duke pulls one out against NC State, Pitt beats cuse and boeheim says the committee should not count the games he wasnt there for, more games on now and later tonight
This is a brutal loss for them. They can hang their hats on home wins vs. A&M and Kentucky, but both at home and they are 3-9 on the road and 5-10 R/N. They now have 3 sub-100 losses. That's a lot.(Not hitting send on this until the clock hits double zero. And until this shot gets waived off- wow)
But why is Vandy such a lock? 13 losses in the weak ass SEC. BEFORE this loss, they were 48 RPI. Advanced metrics look good, Ken Pom/BPI both 23. So before this bad loss (RPI 142), their resume was BARELY better than ours (56/30/29). Yet they're a 9 seed. Lunardi is a clown.
Vandy was in no way safely in before this loss.Vandy being safely in and UConn out is insane.
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology/team-comparison/VANDY/UCONN
Vandy was in no way safely in before this loss.
That site you linked had UConn playing Vandy in a playin game
To people on this site who trust Lunardi as much as they do, they were safely in. He had them at a 9 yesterday, which is like 6-10 spots from the cut.Fair enough. Saw a lot of ppl had them safe and was very confused.
I do. I would bet anything they will not be a 2. My guess is a 4.Who wants to bet that Duke will be a 2 or 3 seed come selection Sunday.
I do. I would bet anything they will not be a 2. My guess is a 4.
All the Pac's best wins come against each other. They inflated their RPIs and beat practically no one. It's crazy when you look at their resumes.While we're blowing up resumes of teams that are "locked" and have absolutely no reason to be over us, I submit Colorado (pre-Arizona loss, for which I waited til it was finished to send):
31 RPI
45 BPI
56 Ken Pom
They basically have the exact reverse resume of us on those metrics (56/29/30) except ours is a little better, same record, and an equal SOS. No bad losses (worst is UCLA at 100, worse than ours).
8 seed in Lunardi's bracket. He has us out.
I'm just saying, the guy has one job to do and he's awful at it. If they're going to use the advanced metrics more heavily now than RPI, someone better wake him up. He's setting a perception and providing potential cover for the committee.
Also, F Cincinnati
It's not just the PAC, all the P5 schools are using this strategy and logic to boost their resumes and RPIs. Somehow when a P5 bests a fellow P5, no matter how awful they may be, has an inherent value because, "well they are a P5 program after all" reasoning. Whereas when the AAC does it it hurts the entire league because a bunch of G5 cupcakes beat up on each other. See 2014 NCAA seeding.All the Pac's best wins come against each other. They inflated their RPIs and beat practically no one. It's crazy when you look at their resumes.
In fact, the RPIs are so inflated that 3 sub-.500 teams have RPIs in the Top 100. That's nuts.