Makurat to transfer | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Makurat to transfer

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dokey said:
Anna, think Colorado. I can direct you to a great Polish restaurant in mountains near me. I am alerting JR Payne.
Expand ...
Dam just about the same time posting
 
.-.
It's the right move. It was clear early this year that Anna couldn't keep up with the rest of the team. She could be an important piece in a program that is a notch below.
 
I’m sorry to see Anna go I enjoyed watching her play. It’s weird I was mad at the other girls who transferred for not being tough enough or dedicated enough I know that’s more a me issue than theirs but I felt protective of the program. I hope she teams up with her sister somewhere good just not too good. Health and happiness Anna.
 
HuskyNan said:
NO SPECULATION on future transfers. This is a bannable offense - I’ve said it a million times
Expand ...
This is crazy though, like free agency in professional sports. Is this just for this year, or is the waiting period a thing of the past? Just asking for clarification Nan.
 
Bald Huskie said:
This is crazy though, like free agency in professional sports. Is this just for this year, or is the waiting period a thing of the past? Just asking for clarification Nan.
Expand ...
It's been a rule forever, baldie.
 
HuskyNan said:
NO SPECULATION on future transfers. This is a bannable offense - I’ve said it a million times
Expand ...
Are you referring to:
  • Where Anna might end up? (She's in the portal already.)
  • Thinking on where entrenched playeres on rosters (UConn, ND, Iowa, for example) might go or stay?
  • Both?

Thanks,
 
.-.
Bummer. Particularly since I think she got a lot of (unfair) harsh comments on this board.

As for the idea that it "frees up another scholarship," I think that's irrelevant. We've got 13 scholarship players. It's hard for >8 to get playing time. I would be super surprised for Geno to take anyone that's not AA-type level.
 
Dillon77 said:
Are you referring to:
  • Where Anna might end up? (She's in the portal already.)
  • Thinking on where entrenched playeres on rosters (UConn, ND, Iowa, for example) might go or stay?
  • Both?

Thanks,
Expand ...
I’m talking about speculation on which UConn players should/would/might transfer out.

This rule has existed for 25 years, as long as I’ve been here
 
Bald Huskie said:
No they had to sit out a year, just as Evina had to!
Expand ...
I’m not sure what question you’re asking...? Are you asking about the rules or about the number of players across the NCAA that have declared theyll transfer?
 
.-.
eebmg said:
The writing was on the wall when she could not get meaningful minutes for Baylor or Arizona when we really could have used her 3pt shot.

With snipers Azzi, Caroline and Saylor, she would have been relegated to mop up.
Expand ...
Why are you so sure all three will excel in their freshman season? It bothers me because she came to UConn this season in the best shape she'd ever been in. We did not get the chance to see the best of Anna and I believe the best of Anna would have kept one or two of those incoming freshmen on the bench. This news is going to bother me for a long time.
 
Vowelguy said:
Bummer. Particularly since I think she got a lot of (unfair) harsh comments on this board.

As for the idea that it "frees up another scholarship," I think that's irrelevant. We've got 13 scholarship players. It's hard for >8 to get playing time. I would be super surprised for Geno to take anyone that's not AA-type level.
Expand ...
I agree 100% on the harsh comments. Written off last year by many after a slow start / adjustment period and then again this year when she was more than likely playing hurt.
 
This is all the portal's fault. It's essentially a secondary market for players now.
 
.-.
HuskyNan said:
I’m not sure what question you’re asking...? Are you asking about the rules or about the number of players across the NCAA that have declared theyll transfer?
Expand ...
No, they let players transfer and play right away this year. Like in Evinas case, she had to sit out a year which was always the rule unless the NCAA gave them a waiver. My question is does the play right away continue, or are they going back to the one year sit out rule?
 
Just for historical perspective, when was the last time a player who had been a starter transferred?
 
CocoHusky said:
Expand ...

Hey the coach in that shot was wearing a sports coat. The coach this past season wore a Uconn pull over shirt, various colors. I wonder which one shows up next season?
 
Bald Huskie said:
No, they let players transfer and play right away this year. Like in Evinas case, she had to sit out a year which was always the rule unless the NCAA gave them a waiver. My question is does the play right away continue, or are they going back to the one year sit out rule?
Expand ...
We’ll find out next week.

www.si.com

Sources: NCAA on Brink of Adopting New Transfer Rule

The D-I Council met virtually Thursday to iron out details of the landmark legislation, which was delayed in the past.
www.si.com www.si.com
 
Bald Huskie said:
No, they let players transfer and play right away this year. Like in Evinas case, she had to sit out a year which was always the rule unless the NCAA gave them a waiver. My question is does the play right away continue, or are they going back to the one year sit out rule?
Expand ...
Although not officially announced the operating assumptions is that immediate eligibility for first time transfers will become permanent for all NCAA sports beginning fall of 2021. The NCAA is probably waiting on the NIL legislation and supreme court cases to be decided before making an official announcement.
 
Last edited:
If Anna is going to Oregon she might want to consider sitting out the year, I’m not sure she would get a lot of playing time next year at Oregon.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,361
Messages
4,567,784
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom