I hope he does prove me wrong, but since everybody already has their excuses on why he doesn't have to produce this year, or next either, I think everyone will say he's a success even if he's terrible. I've asked what people would consider a success, and I've posted what I consider a success, at least 16-18 wins, at least one upset over a seriously good team, and no losses to the steaming heaps on the schedule. Nobody else is willing to say what they think constitutes a minimum standard...most seem to support my man Pudge who says "play hard" as if that is meaningful.