Waquoit
Mr. Positive
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 33,634
- Reaction Score
- 88,512
You guys...I mean there was a solid stretch of the season where that was absolutely the correct assessment.
You guys...I mean there was a solid stretch of the season where that was absolutely the correct assessment.
And wait till the Holyoke St. Patrick's Parade Committee gets involved and gets him commercials for Aer Lingus, for his first flight to the old sod where he can legally have his first Guinness and have it served in a Waterford crystal beer glass.........I think this is where Marc D really helps…he’s got all the social media and Corp connections
Sitting him on those bar saddles might not impress him.Wow, that's going to be really awkward when they take him there.
Maybe McNeeley asked Pope what his record is as a head coach and how many titles he's won.........View attachment 99866
Kentucky fans delusional as always. If Pope made such a big impression on him in that zoom call then why did it end without them scheduling a visit?
everyone needs to stop listening to matt jonesView attachment 99866
Kentucky fans delusional as always. If Pope made such a big impression on him in that zoom call then why did it end without them scheduling a visit?
He hammered the hiring, now he acts like he wanted Pope all along.....everyone needs to stop listening to matt jones
I see what camp you’re in with this one.You guys...
Reel him in!I know it means absolutely nothing but there’s a McNeeley thread on Rupp Rafters (UK board) and 90% of the comments on it are saying this is UConn’s battle to lose. We can’t let him leave campus without a commitment.
This is probably true, given the lack of other planned visits.I know it means absolutely nothing but there’s a McNeeley thread on Rupp Rafters (UK board) and 90% of the comments on it are saying this is UConn’s battle to lose. We can’t let him leave campus without a commitment.
In whose favor?There is a substantial gap in skill between Hoss and Johnson.
Hoss's. Dude's going to be amazing for us.In whose favor?
That's the way I'm leaning. Looking forward to seeing how it plays out.Hoss's. Dude's going to be amazing for us.
Yes, it is highly likely that one is better than the other, even infinitesimally, and that guy will get the starter's 25-30 mpg, with the other guy getting 10-15 mpg, pending foul trouble, etc.No matter who starts, a true 20/20 center rotation is tremendously unlikely.
Hoss's. Dude's going to be amazing for us.
The problem with Johnson is that the things he does well are so strongly dependent on what's going on around him -- guards effectively using ball-screens, getting a defender on their back and another in front that has to commit to stopping the dribble, and freeing up Johnson for the alley-oop. Yeah, there's a good chance we'll still have some of that ability, but if not, his assets go way down in value and his liabilities are highly pronounced.I mean there was a solid stretch of the season where that was absolutely the correct assessment. He was getting worked over on defense and was getting shut down offensively. He definitely picked up his game quite a bit the last stretch of the season, though there are still absolutely valid concerns regarding his ability to defend the post and rebound well enough to be a starter.
There is a camp that won’t acknowledge he improved tremendously from his low point and a camp that won’t acknowledge he had a low point or still has a huge way to go to be a solid starter. To be honest, they’re both equally dumb positions to take at this point.
I just think (imo) that the Hawkins comp is tough because Hawkins was an incredible shooter with seemingly boundless energy and little else. McNeeley already appears to be much better around the rim and much better at all the standard basketball skills like passing and dribbling.
And there is a point this season where Clingan was out and Johnson was the starter and pretty much single handedly won the St John’s game before Xmas coming off Seton Hall loss. We were undefeated in the BigEast with Johnson as a starter.I mean there was a solid stretch of the season where that was absolutely the correct assessment. He was getting worked over on defense and was getting shut down offensively. He definitely picked up his game quite a bit the last stretch of the season, though there are still absolutely valid concerns regarding his ability to defend the post and rebound well enough to be a starter.
There is a camp that won’t acknowledge he improved tremendously from his low point and a camp that won’t acknowledge he had a low point or still has a huge way to go to be a solid starter. To be honest, they’re both equally dumb positions to take at this point.
and both are anagrams for Mali, which is where Adama's from. Which basically means that Liam's as good as ours.fun fact, Liam backwards is Mail
We were undefeated in the BigEast with Johnson as a starter.
Yes we’d jump Miami for the 10 spotif we land him, would this make our 2024 class top 10 nationally?
And there is a point this season where Clingan was out and Johnson was the starter and pretty much single handedly won the St John’s game before Xmas coming off Seton Hall loss. We were undefeated in the BigEast with Johnson as a starter.
People have short memories.