What difference will it make?Yea but has he been practicing? If not, I don't know...
Yea but has he been practicing? If not, I don't know...
What difference will it make?
And right on cue...I hope this game time decision narrative is just for the purpose of throwing the other team off. If it truly is a game time decision for a player who has maybe played a quarter of the games the last three years it will display all the rust the opponents hope for.
Ok I will channel the inner Chief:
- A “game time decision” for a team player is made by commitment in practice. The decision is made by a mental laser focus on the game and game prep.
- A selfish player makes a “game time decision” right before a game so he can get some limelight and jack up shots.
Ok I will channel the inner Chief:
I can always fit some crow in my mouth unlike vast majority of talking heads on this board. But again my thoughts were about more than just shooting. Everyone here also begged for Polley to get minutes. Well? Either way seems like a catch 22. If TL can stand still but move without the ball and play defense and rebound we are good. If he dribbles at all. We will be around 18+ turnoversThose (idiots) who claimed this team was better without Larrier (calling him UConn's Carmello) after the SMU win had a wake up call after the Temple game.
Glad he's back, we need him.
I think you should have someone explain to you what this expression means.
While you're at it, have them explain what "game time decision" means. It's pretty literal.
Who cares? seasons a bust.
Quite frankly, my point is Larrier doesn’t have the baseline experience and tight game to do the game time decision thing. He can be a turnover machine and his shot selection implies he doesn’t let the game come to him. So he’s not a Kemba or Bazz coming off an injury. He doesn’t have that switch that he can effectively turn on at a moments notice and he can’t let the game come to him while getting teammates involved.
Chief Certified Rating
I think Larrier, while a horrible ball handler, is playing outside his comfort zone due to him coming back from his injury. His game should be predicated on receiving a pass, taking one or two dribbles and exploding to the basket. It looks as if he doesn't have the knee strength to get to the rim and elevate or even post up guys smaller than him.Quite frankly, my point is Larrier doesn’t have the baseline experience and tight game to do the game time decision thing. He can be a turnover machine and his shot selection implies he doesn’t let the game come to him. So he’s not a Kemba or Bazz coming off an injury. He doesn’t have that switch that he can effectively turn on at a moments notice and he can’t let the game come to him while getting teammates involved.
Chief Certified Rating
That’s a fan. To the last breathSeason not over till it's over. Ollie and the players aren't going to roll over and die and the fans shouldn't either. All it takes is getting hot at the right time.
Those (idiots) who claimed this team was better without Larrier (calling him UConn's Carmello) after the SMU win had a wake up call after the Temple game.
Glad he's back, we need him.
Season is toast. II just hope they find some success finding their own groove and through game maturity, because the dolt on the bench isn't helping with his directionless, undisciplined offense.Season not over till it's over. Ollie and the players aren't going to roll over and die and the fans shouldn't either. All it takes is getting hot at the right time.