It’s a shame that the tradition of bigotry will be perpetuated.
Austin Powers' Father: "Alright Goldmember, don't play the laughing boy. There are only two things in this world I can't stand - people who are intolerant of other people's cultures, and the Dutch."Bigotry is an intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.
Just in case you don't feel like reading - "branding", "having a consistent brand", coincident to a change in athletic providers (Addidas / Nike). Now-a-days, branding is such a "thing".Yes TP3 good words,. Pat and Geno both have treated their athletes as those free of gender labels.....
Lady Vols have a great tradition..... and there is nothing that needs to be changed in the name.....
As I say this, though, I wonder why (having not read into the story at all) UT has seen the need to can all other "Lady" titles
The AD met with Pat prior to the announcement. Her reps stated that she would not be commenting on it.I wonder if Pat has gone public with her opinion on the change of all the other women's teams at UTenn?
Against it? Indifferent? Support it?
Any of our ...uhhh...LadyVol visitors know?
You're welcome. A lot of people aren't happy about it. I am torn personally. The two departments merged so one would expect the logos to be the same. However, the basketball logo should never change due to Pat's legacy and contribution to the University. As long as that does not change, I will be OK with it.9: appreciate your info. My guess is that means she ain't a bit happy about it.
don't leave out Lady Antebellum too. LOLPersonally, I find the term Lady Vol a convenient way to specify the women's program vs. the men's. The men's program should add "men" to the reference. Calling both teams Vols is too ambiguous.
The problem with the word lady is that it has had so many meanings over the years. Many people (all outside of Knoxville) are going to think of it as a derogatory or demeaning term, particularly older folks. Others will think it's an OK word. In the 60's & 70's, it was objected to by feminist. It connoted low class/demeaning. Cleaning lady, but always woman Doctor for instance. Today, take your pick of how you wish to envision the word's meaning. Will the ladies section of your health club contain exercise equipment usually known as "stripper poles", or will it be tables and tea?
Ironically, lady is currently more acceptable than it was when Tennessee first started using Lady Vols. Although rappers have done damage to the word. Not sure what Lady Gaga has accomplished. Stay tuned for what future use of the word will connote.
Should all team names be changed to gender neutral? For example, should the Gamecocks now be called the Chickens? I don't believe distinguishing oneself in some way is necessarily a bad thing and I don't find anything offensive about "Lady Vols". Especially since it distinguishes them as the team that has won eight National Championships and not the one that hasn't won any.To me, honoring the equality of women is to treat them the same as men - no special treatment, same pay for the same work, etc. In basketball, I believe in treating (read: cheering against, reminding of foul trouble, etc., nothing off color) opposing women's basketball players and coaches the same as I would opposing men's basketball players and coaches. Keeping a separate name for WBB at Tennessee strikes me as being archaic. I think the world of Pat Summitt and enjoyed watching her coach up close for many, many years, but I think it's time to drop "Lady ___" from team names.
"Lady and the Tramp" Who doesn't love the spaghetti scene?don't leave out Lady Antebellum too. LOL
Personally, I find the term Lady Vol a convenient way to specify the women's program vs. the men's. The men's program should add "men" to the reference. Calling both teams Vols is too ambiguous.
The problem with the word lady is that it has had so many meanings over the years. Many people (all outside of Knoxville) are going to think of it as a derogatory or demeaning term, particularly older folks. Others will think it's an OK word. In the 60's & 70's, it was objected to by feminist. It connoted low class/demeaning. Cleaning lady, but always woman Doctor for instance. Today, take your pick of how you wish to envision the word's meaning. Will the ladies section of your health club contain exercise equipment usually known as "stripper poles", or will it be tables and tea?
Ironically, lady is currently more acceptable than it was when Tennessee first started using Lady Vols. Although rappers have done damage to the word. Not sure what Lady Gaga has accomplished. Stay tuned for what future use of the word will connote.
I was doing a bit of research on mascots at the major colleges and some Rutgers / Arizona opponents (in several sports) and there are a number of schools (not huge) that have both male and female mascots.Am I right in thinking that Tennessee was unique in having separate athletic departments for men and women among major Division 1 schools? If there are any other examples, does anyone know if their mascot names included a Lady moniker for the women's teams?
ETT - if you're following this thread, do you know if this has ever been a discussion point at Baylor?
On your first point, I personally like all teams to have the same nickname (except I support the Lady Vols decision). At the same time, I don't associate use of the term "Lady" as being disparaging and, after all, I suspect if a player finds it offensive they will find somewhere else to go.I certainly like Uconn being the single name for men's and women's teams at the school I support. In general I have always felt that the addition of 'Lady' to a school's name for the distaff side of their athletic department was slightly 'demeaning' and in keeping with the second class nature of women's athletics up until title IX (and continuing forward in time for many schools in terms of standards accepted.) For most schools removing the 'Lady' I think would be a positive move. However I do make an exception for LadyVols because of the record and the trail blazing nature of that program and their coach.
While I think gender bias is insidious in our society I do not feel it rises quite to the level of the racism that is still very real. And I think like race, women should be allowed to choose the form in which they would like to be referred to. The women's basketball team at TN has chosen and I am fine with that choice - just like the choices made between Miss/Mrs. vs. Ms. 'Lady' is not a pejorative in its common usage though of course it can be made to be with tone like most words. 'Redskin' on the other hand has always been racist while 'Indian' has a mixed history and has been moved into the racist arena by the adoption of 'Native American' as the preferred nomenclature.
Totally agree.I don't have strong feelings one way or the other on this one but it seems like Hart has made a mess of things. It's clear that his goal is to bring all sports, including women's basketball, under one logo. He didn't accomplish his goal but still managed to cause quite a stir and generate a lot of anger. Seems like a lose-lose for him.