Let me be clear about what I am not saying: I am not arguing that I know your claim to be incorrect. It may be the case that the league signs contracts with players that entitle the league to some kind of a cut of future earnings, however it might be structured.
Here is what I am saying, for the tenth time: I have seen no evidence of your claim. When I asked you for supporting evidence a second time, after the request was ignored the first time, you responded with a snippet from an article that I shared. The excerpt does not support your claim, although you seem to think it does.
So, at the beginning of this ridiculous exchange, I was simply wondering if you were basing your claim, that OTE takes a cut of athletes' future earnings, on published reports, or something else. Through no intention on your part, you answered my question. I see that your claim amounts to a conspiracy theory. I guess it's not a big deal, because I don't think anyone takes you seriously anyway, but it is a little unfair to present speculation or theories as if they are known facts. A reader who doesn't know better has no reason not to believe someone who matter-of-factly puts forth an opinion or assumption as if it were undisputed truth.
@superjohn is also frequently guilty of this, but, in his case, I think he just types like he would speak verbally, and something gets lost in translation. You, on the other hand, seem to be deliberately disingenuous.