Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 966 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,465
Reaction Score
135,529
Did they bribe anyone to get this deal?

It’s Chicago, so maybe.

What happened…Daly “negotiated” the deal with Morgan Stanley and then dropped it on the city council who had a day or two to review it before voting on it. They approved it because…Chicago.

Morgan Stanley then went out and basically resold the deal to Abu Dhabi.

Deal was $1.2B. The investors have made up the entire purchase price, plus $500M. Parking revenue per year is now estimated at $150M per year - there’s 60 years left on the deal.

The investors will make $10B on this, easy.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,922
Reaction Score
49,036
It’s Chicago, so maybe.

What happened…Daly “negotiated” the deal with Morgan Stanley and then dropped it on the city council who had a day or two to review it before voting on it. They approved it because…Chicago.

Morgan Stanley then went out and basically resold the deal to Abu Dhabi.

Deal was $1.2B. The investors have made up the entire purchase price, plus $500M. Parking revenue per year is now estimated at $150M per year - there’s 60 years left on the deal.

The investors will make $10B on this, easy.
They better uncover that bribe quick.

I've seen countries get out of bad deals when the bribe was discovered.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,559
Reaction Score
6,581
Just want to add, that I never heard about the Chicago parking meter deal, what a disaster.
It's not dissimilar to what companies do with red light and speed cameras. It's generally more lucrative for the tech company than for the town.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,559
Reaction Score
6,581
Never mind!
Disney Streaming Tech on that grand list is also from the ESPN campus. A good chunk of Disney's Tech (non-Enterprise) team came out of ESPN Technology and is based there.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,628
Reaction Score
23,897
It's not dissimilar to what companies do with red light and speed cameras. It's generally more lucrative for the tech company than for the town.

This I have read about, specifically related to Washington CT.

 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,829
Reaction Score
14,429
Exactly.
You’ll note that they do not want that….they want more money for “being” Florida State.
Last year was an anomaly for FSU
Look at the ratings of ACC games compared with FSU or Clemson vs any other ACC team on a 5 year average
The FSU ratings were double those of the ACC mean , higher that many SEC or or B1G teams yet they are receiving BC money . Thst model is ridiculous.
In media Eyeballs is the only thing that counts.
As a UConn fan I totally understand we’re in the same boat in as FSU re our media deal . The fact we make the same as DePaul is crazy .
I favor an unbalanced model based on ratings incentives.
Ohio State / Mich + Alabama / Georgia are in the same boat.
These media contracts are averaged per team but if the B1G grts $80million
OSU is probably worth close to double that
Where Rutgers gets a fraction
Media money incentives based on ratings seems fair to me .
It encourages investment and promotion of lower teams . I think it could possible promote stability also .
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
2,931
Reaction Score
9,815
Last year was an anomaly for FSU
Look at the ratings of ACC games compared with FSU or Clemson vs any other ACC team on a 5 year average
The FSU ratings were double those of the ACC mean , higher that many SEC or or B1G teams yet they are receiving BC money . Thst model is ridiculous.
In media Eyeballs is the only thing that counts.
As a UConn fan I totally understand we’re in the same boat in as FSU re our media deal . The fact we make the same as DePaul is crazy .
I favor an unbalanced model based on ratings incentives.
Ohio State / Mich + Alabama / Georgia are in the same boat.
These media contracts are averaged per team but if the B1G grts $80million
OSU is probably worth close to double that
Where Rutgers gets a fraction
Media money incentives based on ratings seems fair to me .
It encourages investment and promotion of lower teams . I think it could possible promote stability also .
Meritocracy is usually a good thing.
 

Online statistics

Members online
406
Guests online
8,439
Total visitors
8,845

Forum statistics

Threads
161,883
Messages
4,282,410
Members
10,118
Latest member
melissa14


.
..
Top Bottom