- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 5,210
- Reaction Score
- 11,720
It is worse when you actually read the history and all the details.Just want to add, that I never heard about the Chicago parking meter deal, what a disaster.
It is worse when you actually read the history and all the details.Just want to add, that I never heard about the Chicago parking meter deal, what a disaster.
What a ridiculous deal.It is worse when you actually read the history and all the details.
Did they bribe anyone to get this deal?
They better uncover that bribe quick.It’s Chicago, so maybe.
What happened…Daly “negotiated” the deal with Morgan Stanley and then dropped it on the city council who had a day or two to review it before voting on it. They approved it because…Chicago.
Morgan Stanley then went out and basically resold the deal to Abu Dhabi.
Deal was $1.2B. The investors have made up the entire purchase price, plus $500M. Parking revenue per year is now estimated at $150M per year - there’s 60 years left on the deal.
The investors will make $10B on this, easy.
It's not dissimilar to what companies do with red light and speed cameras. It's generally more lucrative for the tech company than for the town.Just want to add, that I never heard about the Chicago parking meter deal, what a disaster.
Disney Streaming Tech on that grand list is also from the ESPN campus. A good chunk of Disney's Tech (non-Enterprise) team came out of ESPN Technology and is based there.Never mind!
It's not dissimilar to what companies do with red light and speed cameras. It's generally more lucrative for the tech company than for the town.
Exactly.
Last year was an anomaly for FSUYou’ll note that they do not want that….they want more money for “being” Florida State.
Meritocracy is usually a good thing.Last year was an anomaly for FSU
Look at the ratings of ACC games compared with FSU or Clemson vs any other ACC team on a 5 year average
The FSU ratings were double those of the ACC mean , higher that many SEC or or B1G teams yet they are receiving BC money . Thst model is ridiculous.
In media Eyeballs is the only thing that counts.
As a UConn fan I totally understand we’re in the same boat in as FSU re our media deal . The fact we make the same as DePaul is crazy .
I favor an unbalanced model based on ratings incentives.
Ohio State / Mich + Alabama / Georgia are in the same boat.
These media contracts are averaged per team but if the B1G grts $80million
OSU is probably worth close to double that
Where Rutgers gets a fraction
Media money incentives based on ratings seems fair to me .
It encourages investment and promotion of lower teams . I think it could possible promote stability also .
Tell that to the Qantas flight attendant, who started asking me questions about Geno when he saw my UConn polo shirt.What exactly is the point he thinks he's making?
People around the world don't watch American college
Not in America. It’s ridiculed niw.Meritocracy is usually a good thing.
It ended because of the football/basketball (C7) schism.The old Big East did this with football and look how that ended.
What's her number?Tell that to the Qantas flight attendant, who started asking me questions about Geno when he saw my UConn polo shirt.
Interesting history for the invention of this word.Meritocracy is usually a good thing.
It was a guy. I didn't ask. I like how you assumed it was female.What's her number?
When I replied initially your post still said "she"It was a guy. I didn't ask. I like how you assumed it was female.
It never said she. Never. Your quote even said he. I’ve always had you pegged as one of the bad faith posters.When I replied initially your post still said "she"
LOL, OK. Take your paranoia meds.It never said she. Never. Your quote even said he. I’ve always had you pegged as one of the bad faith posters.
You lied.LOL, OK. Take your paranoia meds.