- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
- Messages
- 1,170
- Reaction Score
- 6,386
Firmly believe there's going to be a big correction with coaches salary. Long gone are the days of $10+ million coaches
UNC just signed Belichick to a $10 million deal.Firmly believe there's going to be a big correction with coaches salary. Long gone are the days of $10+ million coaches
Firmly believe there's going to be a big correction with coaches salary. Long gone are the days of $10+ million coaches
UNC just signed Belichick to a $10 million deal.
A: Does it pay $10M+ per or not?It’s effectively a 1 year deal, with 4 1 year options to renew due to virtually no buyout after a year.
You right, instead of are gone should have said will be gone.UNC just signed Belichick to a $10 million deal.
The coaches restructuring their contracts are struggling. If the coach wins and the fanbase is behind him, I doubt their contracts will be restructured as they will move on to the next job. How long did Harbaugh stay at Michigan after Manuel cut his pay? I would agree that the rate of salary increases will temper, but schools want to win and they will pay up to win.You right, instead of are gone should have said will be gone.
Just in the last 2 weeks we've had 3 P4 coaches restructure their contracts to lower their pay and use the savings to pay the roster.
The coaches restructuring their contracts are struggling. If the coach wins and the fanbase is behind him, I doubt their contracts will be restructured as they will move on to the next job. How long did Harbaugh stay at Michigan after Manuel cut his pay? I would agree that the rate of salary increases will temper, but schools want to win and they will pay up to win.
I don't see that happening. A salary cap will be created to limit the players' pay, and coaches will end up making even more money than before. The players are still more expendable than the coaches.I think new coaches will be hired at lower salaries than existing coaches, and the days of the massive coaching contracts will be ending. In the old days, a coach was the program. Now the coach is a part of the program, along with a GM, NIL Advisor and full talent scout team. The players are obviously going to be taking a big bite out of athletic budget. The coach’s value is declining, and they are becoming more easily replaceable.
They can't cap unless there is collectice bargaining.I don't see that happening. A salary cap will be created to limit the players' pay, and coaches will end up making even more money than before. The players are still more expendable than the coaches.
They really effed up the sport wasn’t this thinking kind of quaint?They can't cap unless there is collectice bargaining.
Free market will sort this out. Sport sucks now, but that is what we wanted.
But for this kind of money, the ncaa or even conferences cant set a limit of compensation that they all agree too. Not without player consent, or it is an antitrust violation.
I completely disagree with this point. Yes, the money is very important, but the head coach is much more valuable in an era where players can move at will as you need a coach that players want to play for or they will leave. Look at what is happening at USC right now as the top players don't seem to want to play for Lincoln Riley even though the NIL money is good. Look at Liam McNeeley. He was committed to Indiana but came to UConn because of Hurley not because of the money. Does McNeeley come to UConn if Hurley went to the Lakers and, say, Tom Moore became head coach? No.The coach’s value is declining, and they are becoming more easily replaceable.
Any sort of collective bargaining is going to be hard for the players because they all have very different agendas. Star players will make far less than market value on the surface in order to subsidize paying the players that aren't worth anything. Endorsement/booster money will then be used under the table to steer the top kids towards the biggest brands.They can't cap unless there is collectice bargaining.
Free market will sort this out. Sport sucks now, but that is what we wanted.
But for this kind of money, the ncaa or even conferences cant set a limit of compensation that they all agree too. Not without player consent, or it is an antitrust violation.
I don't see that happening. A salary cap will be created to limit the players' pay, and coaches will end up making even more money than before. The players are still more expendable than the coaches.
You mean something akin to Colorado ?What I am saying is not that different than what you are saying. We are less than two years away from a top transfer telling a program that he will come if the program replaces the coach.
Imagine what happens if an agent calls a .500 school and says that if the school hires his coach, he will deliver 10 transfers. How quickly is the incumbent fired?
Yep, so we have a series of minor leagues JUCO (minor³)> DIII (lower minor²) > DII (upper minor minor²) > FCS (lower minor) > FBS (upper minor) > NFL...and in an alternate universe you have whatever the CFL pretends to be (I've watched the games when nothing esle was on, but this 3 down thing is as much football as lipsyncing during the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade is a real live performance). What's next, unlimited transferring in minor league college football where you get to compete until the age of 30?In fairness, that would be A BALL. The G5 has already been designated AAA. FCS is appropriately AA.
NIL, ironically, is not the biggest challenge at the moment.I think the hysteria over NIL is totally overblown
Having said that, I’ve sat in the coaches area of a P4 school after a reg season game and a lot of time is spent with parents who want to know what they can get in terms of $$$.NIL, ironically, is not the biggest challenge at the moment.
Holy smokes, I can only imagine how some of those conversations go..."Coach, my boy scored 2 TDs and ran for 100 yards today, I think that's worth $100K. Get it or he portals out next week...".Having said that, I’ve sat in the coaches area of a P4 school after a reg season game and a lot of time is spent with parents who want to know what they can get in terms of $$$.
I can see why HCs are moving to coordinator roles.