- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 2,792
- Reaction Score
- 9,190
Good luck trying to get Mansfield to allow an on campus football stadium In Storrs. I just don’t see that happening in any of our life times.
I get the Mansfield angle but I would think that mentallity would have changed significantly by now. Many locals have grown up watching UConn become a national basketball powerhouse and the athletic department as a whole be competitive nationally. Other folks move to the area specifically because they are involved with the University. I see it in our town where younger folks favor things like apartment housing and better roads while older folks constantly complain about commercial progress. Mansfield is rural but it's not Deliverance material. Come on Mansfield!Good luck trying to get Mansfield to allow an on campus football stadium In Storrs. I just don’t see that happening in any of our life times.
Agree. Have you been on campus recently, or I should say to 4 corners? Massive Apartment(condo?) complex nearing completion. Nothing says rural like a monstrous housing complex literally at the entrance to campus.I get the Mansfield angle but I would think that mentallity would have changed significantly by now. Many locals have grown up watching UConn become a national basketball powerhouse and the athletic department as a whole be competitive nationally. Other folks move to the area specifically because they are involved with the University. I see it in our town where younger folks favor things like apartment housing and better roads while older folks constantly complain about commercial progress. Mansfield is rural but it's not Deliverance material. Come on Mansfield!
I doubt all that costs anywhere near 600 million dollarsYou say it would cost four times as much to build a new stadium than to renovate Rentschler. Have you calculated what it costs UConn right now in terms of national prestige, coaching and recruit interest, student enthusiasm, and alumni support to have a relatively distant off-campus rather than on-campus facility? Suppose, for example, that stadium location was a factor that an expansion-minded "P" conference might consider when analyzing potential candidates. What if the absence of an on-campus facility was deemed to be so indicative of a school's lack of commitment to football that it influenced that conference's decision to look elsewhere? What losses of potential revenue would accrue, year in and year out, if UConn were left out of the realignment picture for that reason?
Colorado State University's new on-campus Canvas Stadium, with a capacity of 36,500 (including boxes and other premium seating), cost $220 million to build in 2017. Naming rights garnered more than $37 million, so subtract that from the cost of construction. Stadium capacity can be expanded, if justified. I haven't been there but understand that it's an attractive and functional facility.I doubt all that costs anywhere near 600 million dollars
Thanks for the info Hank. Wish more people on this site understood this.Colorado State University's new on-campus Canvas Stadium, with a capacity of 36,500 (including boxes and other premium seating), cost $220 million to build in 2017. Naming rights garnered more than $37 million, so subtract that from the cost of construction. Stadium capacity can be expanded, if justified. I haven't been there but understand that it's an attractive and functional facility.
Wish more people understood that money doesn't grow on trees. That more people outside the UConn FB bubble would just as soon get rid of it then pony up hundreds of millions of dollars in further service to it.Thanks for the info Hank. Wish more people on this site understood this.
Think of it as an investment, one that could pay long-term dividends if managed wisely.Wish more people understood that money doesn't grow on trees. That more people outside the UConn FB bubble would just as soon get rid of it then pony up hundreds of millions of dollars in further service to it.
Think of it as an investment, one that could pay long-term dividends if managed wisely.
I prefer to think of it as a massive financial outlay with literally no benefit.Think of it as an investment, one that could pay long-term dividends if managed wisely.
Yes, but Key Tweets stimulate conversation, and conversations evolve and meander. As famed architect Louis Henry Sullivan noted, "Form ever follows function."This is the Key Tweets thread sir.
Well, Connecticut pays 2.7 million a year to lease the Rent, so eliminating that is a starting point for a potential financial benefit. If you add to that lost revenue from not being able to realize profits from parking in concessions I'll make a guest that's another 800,000 a season, roughly. So that would be about 3.5 million a year.I prefer to think of it as a massive financial outlay with literally no benefit.
sounds suspiciously like the start to a 10 year plan to build an on campus stadium, predicated on playing winning football.Well, Connecticut pays 2.7 million a year to lease the Rent, so eliminating that is a starting point for a potential financial benefit. If you add to that lost revenue from not being able to realize profits from parking in concessions I'll make a guest that's another 800,000 a season, roughly. So that would be about 3.5 million a year.
Now, I'm not arguing in favor of abandoning the rent and immediately building a new stadium, I'm just responding to your "literally no benefit" comment. Keep in mind that potentially the benefit could be significantly higher if we actually had a competitive football team.
Let me restate a point that I frequently make, and made above, right now we are blessed to have Rentschler Field and I'm not advocating that we've abandon it. But 10 years from now the Barnes will be paid off and the building will have reached the end of its useful life and we will be faced with a decision of "massive" reinvestment, or rebuilding. at that point in time it makes sense to weigh the choice of reinvesting in the Rent versus building on campus.
Yes, but Key Tweets stimulate conversation, and conversations evolve and meander. As famed architect Louis Henry Sullivan noted, "Form ever follows function."
Thread 'Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.'No. I created this thread. Don’t tell me what it is about.
Put this somewhere else.
It’s for tweets. Not discussion.
I'm not telling you what the thread's about. I'm telling you that some Tweets elicit commentary, and when they do, I'm not the only one who offers responses that apparently offend your sense of order.No. I created this thread. Don’t tell me what it is about.
Put this somewhere else.
It’s for tweets. Not discussion.