Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 636 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

ConnHuskBask

Shut Em Down!
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
9,066
Reaction Score
33,519
Maybe the media companies tightened their belts because they knew they'd make these acquisitions?

I mean, nobody is forcing ESPN/FOX to pay a nearly combined $100M a year for Arizona, Arizona State and Utah football and basketball games.

This is all pretty much happening in real time, they could just say no.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,987
Reaction Score
10,632
Are we in mourning now, or just waiting for more news on Big 12 moves?

Seems focus has shifted to ACC
ACC is the next fat pig waiting to be slaughtered. It is just a matter of time so might as well be now. FSU's recent bitching public comments are just the bat signal to get this all started.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2016
Messages
63
Reaction Score
255
I see the reverse. The B12 is going to get a haircut in 2031. Teams will start clamoring to get into the ACC.
Agree. For all the ACC problems, it still has a lot of strong brands. WVU has to be in play as Big 12 travel for them will be tough.
 

ConnHuskBask

Shut Em Down!
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
9,066
Reaction Score
33,519
Fox was paying about half of a $3B/12yr television contract to the Pac12.

They’ve fixed that.

Which was set to expire anyways? Then they went big into the 12 team Big 12, which now looks to be the 16 team Big 12, in addition to the 4 new B1G adds.

I think the Big East deal will be pretty bad, but that's more because half the teams stink, not that Fox or ESPN is exercising any form of fiscal restraint.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 4>1 But 5>>>>1 is even better!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,230
Reaction Score
43,337
I count 5 at best, but more likely only 4.

Which do you think have that value?

Notre Dame, Virginia, North Carolina, Florida St, Clemson.

That's it.

If I had to predict, it would be ND and Virginia to the B1G, with UNC and Florida St to the SEC.

My only question really is Clemson. It depends on whether the SEC wants to duplicate a small state.

Either way, the leftovers of the ACC would be a lot more compelling than the B12 when it comes to markets. They'd have Atlanta, South Carolina, Raleigh Durham, parts of Virginia, Pittsburgh, etc., these are heavily populated areas.
If only twenty is the end point then NC State and Virginia Tech end up in the opposite conference that North Carolina and Virginia end up (SEC or Big). Virginia to the BIG and UNC to the SEC would be my guess.

Question mark on SEC getting FSU because of Florida and Clemson because of South Carolina. But where do they end up if the BIG is at twenty? If UNC and Virginia go to the SEC then the BIG takes FSU and Clemson? I think they take Cal and Stanford first.

Question mark if BIG even wants ND at this point and would just prefer them to wither up and die. I’m sure the media would convince them otherwise so slot out one of the mid Atlantic schools for ND unless it’s NC.

Ironically Duke could be in trouble. Their value lies in going in tandem with UNC and UNC wants them to wither and die. Duke unlike ND is hated by everyone even here in NC.
If conferences go to 24 which I believe they will then it becomes easier to predict the demise of the ACC because the Big12, SEC and BIG will certainly take the best of the rest in the ACC and PAC and G5. Unless they prefer any B12 schools. Kansas and maybe U of A would be possible.

Given your scenario what other teams besides UNC and FSU does the SEC want to get to twenty or twenty four?
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
927
Reaction Score
3,529
ACC is the next fat pig waiting to be slaughtered. It is just a matter of time so might as well be now. FSU's recent bitching public comments are just the bat signal to get this all started.
I’m still balancing work and this…. Not successfully BTW.

Have we seen any movement by Big 12 on ASU or Utah?

Where’s our beloved GoKU? Is he still rock’n n chaulk’n the huskies?

He seemed very calm and confident this morning, like he knew the game plan.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
3,949
Reaction Score
13,801
Yes. Randy Edsall 2.0 was one of the worst decisions ever by UCONN admin and AD Dave.
Pasqualoni was bad and he took the good program down from an upward rise to a 20 degree downward slant. Diaco steepened the decline of UConn football to to 50 degree slant while wearing roller skates. With Edsall the decline went to 90 degrees like the edge of cliff perpendicular with the ground and the program fell flat to the ground hard and got deep sixed.

After Diaco got fired, UConn had a very crucial hiring decision in 2016 and it had to be the correct one and instead it couldn't have been worse IMO. I felt so deflated when I saw his announcement of being hired. When he followed his first season at 3-10 with a 1-11 season and stated "it was part of the process of rebuilding, fans need to be patient" I wanted Benedict to put his foot up Edsall's arse and kick him out right then and there.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
501
Reaction Score
1,934
It's irrelevant whether schools in a conference bring the per school payment or not -- just relevant for potential new additions.

ASU is a huge school, in a large and growing metropolis, who over time has had plenty of periods where they are above average on a P5 level in both hoops and pigskin. Am I hard pressed to make a case that, if we can be worth $30M to the XII, so could they? No, I am not hard pressed.
People tend to make unsubstantiated comments. Ie UCF brings $30m to the Big XII.

To your point regarding ASU. I’m a metric driven individual.

The media revenue numbers we are seeing could not be driven by alumni only. The eyes of the general population surrounding the institution need to be engaged as well. Level of engagement is fluid and influenced by many factors. Other entertainment options (BC was good when the Pats were bad and vice versa - some of that could apply to us as well), and winning or competing percentage (In the 90’s think how many people were jumping on our hoops bandwagon). And ease of access to product (think population density - how easy is it for me to see my team). Plus a flagship may carry more weight in winning over a states general population than a private - exceptions could be Notre Dame, Navy, Army, BYU. Some of these institutional management can control (coaching hires, marketing, etc). Others are out of their control. And academic performance which is not in question with the exception of AAU.

Look at the B1G most recent adds starting with Penn St (excepting Nebraska, can’t figure out that one).

Metric 1. Population per P5 institution.
Rutgers (NJ) - 9.3m per school
Maryland - 6.2m
California - 9.8m
Pennsylvania - 6.5m
Washington - 3.9m (x 2 w/o WSU)
Oregon - 2.1m (x 2 w/o OSU)
• Ohio - 5.9m (x 2 pre UC to XII)
• Michigan - 5.0m
• Illinois - 6.4m
• Texas - 4.9m

Metric 2. Density
New Jersey - 1,263 pp/sqmi
California - 251 (much more if isolate SC)
Maryland - 632
Penn - 290
• Ohio 286, Illinois 230, Mich 173

So NYC. It has no P5 schools. So look at NYC-Nassau/Suffolk-Westchester-Rockland plus CT plus NJ plus MA. Population 33m second only to CA. Area 22k sq miles ( Texas 261k, CA 156k, OH 41k). 3 P5 (if we’re in)
Metric 1 - 11m pp/school
Metric 2 - 1,488 pp/sqmi
Both number one in each category.

Before dismissing think all the other criteria that’s been floated around these last 10 years. Must border existing state, history, culture, unsubstantiated $.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
278
Reaction Score
1,185
So ultimately we will likely end up back in a conference with what will be the ACC rejects?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GG

Jimbo

Running to Stand Still
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Messages
710
Reaction Score
3,108
Any chance the Big 12 could put its newfound leverage to some actual use, playing hardball with the would-be Pac refugees and offering them invitations at a reduced share? The conference has those schools over a barrel right now and can probably do whatever it wants, including simply adding Arizona and stopping at 14.

So just how badly does each school want in? (We may not like it, but UConn might be willing to accept a cheaper price, if push came to shove, than Utah or ASU would be willing to stomach.)
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
2,819
Reaction Score
9,565
I mean, nobody is forcing ESPN/FOX to pay a nearly combined $100M a year for Arizona, Arizona State and Utah football and basketball games.

This is all pretty much happening in real time, they could just say no.
Of course they could say no (and I'm sure some of these schools will be at partial revenue share), but certainly live sports still wins the day with the media companies.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,347
Reaction Score
21,846
So you think that these seven or eight schools are dissolve a conference to void a network deal with ESPN and then they are going to just move to another conference and receive more money….from ESPN.

I can explain why this is not going to happen, but it should be pretty apparent to you.
Isn't that what just happened to the Pac 12? USC and UCLA moved for a large increase. It appears Oregon and Washington will get much more than the potential Pac 12 deal was paying. And, the schools that go to the Big 12 will get more money as well. Think about this, the Pac 12 schools in their new conferences will get more in aggregate than the networks were willing to pay for the whole conference. Unfortunately, there will be 2 to 4 Pac 12 casualties.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 4>1 But 5>>>>1 is even better!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,230
Reaction Score
43,337
So you think that these seven or eight schools are dissolve a conference to void a network deal with ESPN and then they are going to just move to another conference and receive more money….from ESPN.

I can explain why this is not going to happen, but it should be pretty apparent to you.
My argument is contingent on what the final number the SEC and BIG choose as their end point. If twenty I agree with you. If twenty four then I stand by my position.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
21,049
Reaction Score
47,646
Yes. Randy Edsall 2.0 was one of the worst decisions ever by UCONN admin and AD Dave.
It's the one stain on Dave Benedict's record. After year 2, when it was apparent he wasn't up for the job he should have jettisoned his behind. He had less patience with Ollie who won a title than he did with Edsall.
 

UConn Dan

Not HuskyFanDan; I lurk & I like
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
3,095
Reaction Score
12,305


It's all speculation, and everything is fluid. UConn is said to have felt great about its Big 12 prospects early this week. Now that week is ending and the possibility seems less likely, even with longstanding support of commissioner Brett Yormark.

It’s over

They just can't, for now, shake the stigma born of several years of garbage football. A major step was taken last year. More, it appears, are needed.

UConn has — again, as of Friday afternoon — likely been left to consider its next move, and it’s not the only school. If you’re Oregon State or Washington State or Memphis or Colorado State (the list goes on) you’re feeling left out this weekend, too.

But that next move is actually simple. UConn has to keep doing what it’s been doing. Keep winning in basketball. Keep getting better in football. Keep operating a nationally-elite department and puffing your chest as a national brand.

And earn your way into the next discussion, like you did the most recent one.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
3,949
Reaction Score
13,801
His choice was bring back Diaco, or bring on Edsall. Those were his two choices at the time (the boosters would only pay the Diaco buyout and new coach if it was Edsall). While Edsall was a complete disaster, I still don't know if it was better to take on HCRE2.0 or continue with the complete incompetence of Diaco.
Yeah it's not much of a choice which is why I never blamed Benedict for Edsall's hiring. Those two choices are like asking "would you like your arm broken or your leg?". You could argue one is better than the other, but neither is good.

Here is a question: If the boosters had any inkling that Edsall would be this disastrous, do you think they would have been so strict with giving Benedict those 2 options? I don't. The Edsall hiring really deep sixed the football program. I would guess almost any other coaching option would have been better.

Mora's hiring is like water from the Lazarus Pit from the Batman comics that revitalizes injured or dead bodies. UConn football broke out of the coffin and has half their body above ground. That's why this season is so important for UConn football.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
3,949
Reaction Score
13,801
I’m still balancing work and this…. Not successfully BTW.

Have we seen any movement by Big 12 on ASU or Utah?

Where’s our beloved GoKU? Is he still rock’n n chaulk’n the huskies?

He seemed very calm and confident this morning, like he knew the game plan.
Me neither, not successful today, LOL.
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
481
Reaction Score
681
Seven schools I believe want to break the GOR. How hard is it going to be for their competitors to entice some holdouts to join those seven in a vote to dissolve the conference?

If I had any doubts prior to this week they are now gone.
That will not dissolve the GOR. Do you think ESPN would be that stupid to agree to building the ACCN only to have the conference dissolved?
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
8,699
Reaction Score
58,675
It’s over

They just can't, for now, shake the stigma born of several years of garbage football. A major step was taken last year. More, it appears, are needed.

UConn has — again, as of Friday afternoon — likely been left to consider its next move, and it’s not the only school. If you’re Oregon State or Washington State or Memphis or Colorado State (the list goes on) you’re feeling left out this weekend, too.

But that next move is actually simple. UConn has to keep doing what it’s been doing. Keep winning in basketball. Keep getting better in football. Keep operating a nationally-elite department and puffing your chest as a national brand.

And earn your way into the next discussion, like you did the most recent one.
Bull spit. What the hell has half of these schools in the P4 done to “earn” their way in. Go to hell
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
768
Reaction Score
1,168
Oh my lord, if you’re still citing the AAU garbage ….

Miami gets terrible local support unless they’re #1.
If the BiG gets FSU, Miami adds nearly nothing.
The B1G does what the B1G wants.
 

Online statistics

Members online
40
Guests online
1,081
Total visitors
1,121

Forum statistics

Threads
159,645
Messages
4,198,766
Members
10,065
Latest member
Rjja


.
Top Bottom