Kevin Ollie’s lawyers ask for depositions from NCAA president Mark Emmert and national search firm as contract dispute with UConn | The Boneyard

Kevin Ollie’s lawyers ask for depositions from NCAA president Mark Emmert and national search firm as contract dispute with UConn

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
2,985
Reaction Score
9,300
Haven’t followed this BS in a while. For anyone that is, is he still saying he did nothing wrong and that the firing wasn’t with just cause?
 

8893

Curiouser
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,851
Reaction Score
96,512
200w.gif
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,438
Reaction Score
18,126
Is the fallout from this part of the reason why Calhoun's semi annual charity game fell apart?
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,044
Reaction Score
209,330
Haven’t followed this BS in a while. For anyone that is, is he still saying he did nothing wrong and that the firing wasn’t with just cause?
"Ollie’s legal team continues to do whatever it can to deflect from the facts — many uncontested — that led to his termination,” read a UConn statement on Feb. 23, in reaction to the Hurley subpoena.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
8,266
Reaction Score
22,629
KO's defense amounts to "Jim Calhoun did just as much wrong as me and still got paid therefore I deserve to get paid too."

That's not how it works Kevin.
When Kevin is in a protected class, and Jim isn't, that is pretty close to how it works.

I'm not saying he should get paid.

But if his argument is the language in the contracts were the same/similar, but they fired him and not Calhoun for the same/similar transgressions, then he was treated differently, and the fact he's in a protected class means he can make that argument and potentially still get paid.

There's a very legitimate argument to be made as to why he was treated differently, and why it had nothing to do with race. I won't bother making it, but I don't think the school did anything wrong and only think he should be paid to make this go away. But he's protected, so if he's treated differently for similar actions, then the school will need to successfully make that argument.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,351
Reaction Score
46,633
I just read the "college sports" is about to go thread.

Then I read this and think, none of it matters anymore.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
637
Reaction Score
2,414
During my too long legal career in CT I had a couple of dealings with the lawyer representing KO and found him competent and smart. In this dispute, however, I think a settlement should have been achieved soon after KO was terminated. There was sufficient monetary room ($10 mil to $0.00) that a number should have been quickly agreed upon and KO continued on with his career. There is zero chance that anyone will hire KO until this is over therefore he has lost a ton of money in potential earnings.

As a lawyer I constantly reminded clients that in the lawsuit business principles are very, very expensive, close you eyes, hold your nose, find a number and settle, you know what you are getting and what you are giving up, leaving the result to a stranger (Judge, jury, arbitrator) is the worse avenue available. I don't think KO has been represented wisely.
 

PWS

Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
94
Reaction Score
276
When Kevin is in a protected class, and Jim isn't, that is pretty close to how it works.

I'm not saying he should get paid.

But if his argument is the language in the contracts were the same/similar, but they fired him and not Calhoun for the same/similar transgressions, then he was treated differently, and the fact he's in a protected class means he can make that argument and potentially still get paid.

There's a very legitimate argument to be made as to why he was treated differently, and why it had nothing to do with race. I won't bother making it, but I don't think the school did anything wrong and only think he should be paid to make this go away. But he's protected, so if he's treated differently for similar actions, then the school will need to successfully make that argument.


From what I have read. The language in the contracts is not the same. In Fact, the specific language in Ollie's contract was a direct result of the compliance issues Calhoun had that led to UConn's punishment and a warning from the NCAA that future infractions will be treated worse. Maybe a good lawyer can make hay with that, but the language in the contracts was not the same
 

8893

Curiouser
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,851
Reaction Score
96,512
From what I have read. The language in the contracts is not the same. In Fact, the specific language in Ollie's contract was a direct result of the compliance issues Calhoun had that led to UConn's punishment and a warning from the NCAA that future infractions will be treated worse. Maybe a good lawyer can make hay with that, but the language in the contracts was not the same
I thought the language in both contracts was the same, but the University's story was that Ollie's contract was delivered with oral emphasis/reinforcement to the effect that "we really mean it this time" re NCAA compliance because of the past issues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
132
Guests online
4,143
Total visitors
4,275

Forum statistics

Threads
157,111
Messages
4,083,765
Members
9,979
Latest member
Texasfan01


Top Bottom