KenPom Rankings since 1997 | Page 2 | The Boneyard

KenPom Rankings since 1997

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,188
Reaction Score
82,240
it means that his model which is proven to be very accurate ignores the bias that people feel the need to cry about when they don’t like the results.
Accurate at what?
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
Accurate at what?

Determining the realtive quality of college basketball teams.

If you disagree i’m more than happy to book your wagers against the kenpom score prediction.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,188
Reaction Score
82,240
Determining the realtive quality of college basketball teams.

If you disagree i’m more than happy to book your wagers against the kenpom score prediction.
I'm sure you would be happy to book my bets. But you seem like the kind of guy that wouldn't pay off. But I'm sure you would have good explanation.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
I'm sure you would be happy to book my bets. But you seem like the kind of guy that wouldn't pay off. But I'm sure you would have good explanation.

lol - yeah making up a idiotic personal attack is about all you’ve got when youve just been spewing nonsense

i actually put my money where my mouth is.... don’t worry i knew you arent one to back up when you flap your gums
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,188
Reaction Score
82,240
Projection. You’re the one that has to add the slight when just the answer would have sufficed. And I have always found the big mouths being the hardest to collect from. So Ken Pom is good when you want to say my team is better than yours. Fine.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
Projection. You’re the one that has to add the slight when just the answer would have sufficed. And I have always found the big mouths being the hardest to collect from. So Ken Pom is good when you want to say my team is better than yours. Fine.

lol. Half this makes no sense you are more wrong about me than kenpom.

you dont like the answer. that a reflection on you champ not the model.
 
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
108
Reaction Score
452
I love Kenpom. What I'm seeing here is that the last few years destroyed us (obv). Compare this through 2014 and we're probably top 10 or top 5.
 

GoDAWGS

"I Love Whaley"
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
160
Reaction Score
659
So let me get this straight...the team with the most championships in that span is ranked #19?
Tells you all you need to know about KenPom.
Its math and models, "all models are wrong, but allot of them are useful" look at the parameters and decide for your self what it means
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,300
Reaction Score
19,589
Utter nonsense. Why not 1957? Or 2007? Or 1964. The date changes everything. Why not 1948? Or 1939 when the NCAA tourney started??
 

jleves

Awesomeness
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
4,253
Reaction Score
15,065

AAC RANKINGS

TeamConfRtgBestWorstMedianTop 10Top 25Top 50CHF4S16R1
19​
Amer
+22.66​
2​
2009
179​
2018
26​
6​
11​
15​
4​
5​
9​
14​
22​
Amer
+21.83​
2​
2008
161​
2018
49​
4​
5​
12​
0​
1​
4​
10​
30​
Amer
+20.58​
2​
2002
141​
2007
27​
4​
11​
19​
0​
0​
2​
18​
56​
Amer
+15.97​
6​
2014
189​
2001​
64​
2​
7​
10​
0​
1​
3​
8​
66​
Amer
+14.33​
4​
2000​
150​
2014
59​
1​
6​
10​
0​
0​
2​
12​
86​
Amer
+10.17​
7​
2000​
211​
2006
85​
1​
2​
5​
0​
0​
1​
6​
89​
SMU
Amer
+9.18​
11​
2017
283​
2008
130​
0​
2​
4​
0​
0​
0​
2​
92​
Amer
+8.54​
12​
2019
230​
1998​
132​
0​
2​
2​
0​
0​
1​
3​
123​
UCF
Amer
+4.32​
34​
2019
299​
1997​
147​
0​
0​
1​
0​
0​
0​
3​
124​
Amer
+4.12​
48​
2012
292​
2017
132​
0​
0​
1​
0​
0​
0​
1​
175​
Amer
-0.23​
68​
1997​
285​
2014
196​
0​
0​
0​
0​
0​
0​
0​
182​
Amer
-1.33​
109​
1997​
307​
2018
191​
0​
0​
0​
0​
0​
0​
0​

BIG EAST RANKINGS

TeamConfRtgBestWorstMedianTop 10Top 25Top 50CHF4S16R1
7​
BE
+30.03​
1​
2018
91​
1998​
28​
6​
11​
15​
2​
3​
6​
16​
25​
BE
+21.48​
12​
1998​
81​
2005
31​
0​
11​
16​
0​
0​
7​
17​
33​
BE
+19.81​
11​
2002
113​
1999​
36​
0​
6​
13​
0​
1​
4​
13​
36​
BE
+19.32​
4​
2007
124​
2004
44​
2​
7​
12​
0​
1​
3​
10​
44​
BE
+17.69​
15​
2013
116​
2010
51​
0​
2​
11​
0​
0​
0​
12​
47​
BE
+17.53​
12​
2010
145​
2005
36​
0​
7​
14​
0​
2​
5​
15​
53​
BE
+16.43​
24​
2004
162​
2000​
69​
0​
2​
7​
0​
0​
1​
7​
67​
BE
+14.33​
26​
2018
117​
2013
76​
0​
0​
4​
0​
0​
1​
7​
75​
BE
+12.40​
7​
1999​
211​
2016
79​
1​
1​
5​
0​
0​
1​
6​
101​
BE
+7.20​
30​
2000​
233​
1997​
150​
0​
0​
2​
0​
0​
0​
2​
To put this in perspective, removing UConn from the AAC rankings:
AAC 95
NBE 49

If you include UConn in both:
AAC 89
NBE 42

Remember, this is intended to be a head coaching destination rating based on conference and team performance. Seems like UConn would raise up several spots automatically by being in the BE. Start winning again and we're a top 10 destination for coaches and hopefully recruits.

I just really like numbers!
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
The morans bleating about KP in this thread are the type of idiots who don’t think Mike Trout is the AL MVP.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2018
Messages
487
Reaction Score
1,469
Biggest surprises to me were Texas at #10 and Maryland at #14.

Texas more so for the lack of success, and Maryland because I think it's a fish out of water in the Big10 (albeit a very rich fish).
I’m very surprised by Virginia too. I’ve also thought Syracuse was highly overrated
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,838
Reaction Score
8,393
I'm sure fans of all 18 teams ahead of us in these rankings would gladly trade their number in the ranking column or our number in the championship column. There is really only one truly meaningful column in that chart,
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,300
Reaction Score
19,589
Determining the realtive quality of college basketball teams.

If you disagree i’m more than happy to book your wagers against the kenpom score prediction.
Accurate in any given season but this sort of ranking is beneath him. I get lots of people live this stuff but seriously? The 1999 Big East was nothing like the 2017 Big East. And a low ranked team that wins it all is never getting the same taking as a great team. And that doesn’t even account for rule changes training changes and so on.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
13,119
Reaction Score
86,994

Connecticut
KenPom program ranking: No. 19
Probably the most controversial listing in Pomeroy's rankings, which is saying something considering we are talking about a top-20 program here.
"The conference drags them down a little bit," Pomeroy said of UConn. "If I plug in the Big East for them, they might move up two or three spots. But given how spotty their track record has been recently, and they're in the seventh-best league in the country, it kind of makes sense."
But UConn's so fascinating because four national championships -- the most of any program in the past 25 years -- isn't enough to get the Huskies onto the top shelf. What's the hold-up? Well, Pomeroy told me that NCAA Tournament performance did not factor into these rankings. Disagree with that if you will, but Pomeroy's rankings have never put extra emphasis into March Madness success: beating good teams in the tournament inherently boosts your standing in his rankings as is. This IS about season-long performance.
"Obviously tournament performance is going to help you," Pomeroy said. "You don't get bonus points for winning a national title. UConn has been pretty good at busting my system."
In fact, UConn's title runs inarguably helped its positioning, but also the 2011 title-winning team (which finished 10th in the final KenPom rankings that season) and the 2014 team (15th) are the lowest-rated champs in his database.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,188
Reaction Score
82,240
"Obviously tournament performance is going to help you," Pomeroy said. ... UConn has been pretty good at busting my system."
Jay Bilas must have been using KenPom when he predicted a UConn loss in every tournament game they played in 2011.
 

Online statistics

Members online
73
Guests online
2,766
Total visitors
2,839

Forum statistics

Threads
155,799
Messages
4,032,040
Members
9,865
Latest member
Sad Tiger


Top Bottom