I was at Walmart today and Jackie Stiles was the clerk in checkout line #8!
Nope. There's more to being a great basketball player than just scoring points. Where is Jackie Stiles today? Where do people rank her? You almost never hear her name mentioned when talking about the all-time greats.
I was at Walmart today and Jackie Stiles was the clerk in checkout line #8!
I was at Walmart today and Jackie Stiles was the clerk in checkout line #8!
Now that's what I call a sense of humor.So you worked as a bag boy on checkout line #8 yesterday? Cool
Now that's what I call a sense of humor.
I guess UConn focused people or people who didn't follow Wcbb before 2001 don't really understand how good of a player she was. SWMState's run to the final four was magical. Unfortunately they took out the #1 seeded blue devils in the sweet 16 that year.
Mitchell was well ahead of Plum's pace thru her first two seasons. This year Mitchell is scoring less than Plum did as a Jr. And I have a really hard time seeing Mitchell do during her Sr. year what Plum has done. It could be close, but I think Mitchell will come up a little short.
if she doesn't have one of these... she's not even in the discussionShe has most points. So I was asking about best players. Taurasi, Maya, Parker, Holdsclaw, Miller, and Stewart. Is she in that elite company as a player?
What? So then Larry Bird, Clyde Drexel, Elvin Hayes, Elena Delle Donne are all second tier players in the college ranks because they couldn't bring their "pedestrian"^ teams to a title like the aforementioned list of players who had significantly more talent AND better coaching than they did? Sorry but many on this board thread have become myopic on assessing great talent if not in a UConn uniform. We are better than that.if she doesn't have one of these... she's not even in the discussion
What? So then Larry Bird, Clyde Drexel, Elvin Hayes, Elena Delle Donne are all second tier players in the college ranks because they couldn't bring their "pedestrian"^ teams to a title like the aforementioned list of players who had significantly more talent AND better coaching than they did? Sorry but many on this board thread have become myopic on assessing great talent if not in a UConn uniform. We are better than that.
Taking nothing away from Ms. Plum's accomplishment, which is something to marvel at...but my answer would be no.She has most points. So I was asking about best players. Taurasi, Maya, Parker, Holdsclaw, Miller, and Stewart. Is she in that elite company as a player?
Taking nothing away from Ms. Plum's accomplishment, which is something to marvel at...but my answer would be no.
Is there any doubt that anyone of the all-time greats you listed couldn't have scored/averaged 30+ points a game during their careers if they'd taken 40-50% of their respective teams' FGAs? Is there any doubt that any of the all-time greats you listed would trade one of their NCAA titles for an individual scoring award?
Washington's offense is all Plum, all the time. And it starts with her bringing the ball up as PG and then deciding whether to make a play or distribute the ball.
She took 28 of the team's 59 FGA's (47%) in her 57 point record breaking performance. The total assists for the team was 6 for the entire game and Plum had ZERO assists (as a guard no less)! The rest of the 10 players on the team (that all saw minutes in the game) combined for 27 points.
What? So then Larry Bird, Clyde Drexel, Elvin Hayes, Elena Delle Donne are all second tier players in the college ranks because they couldn't bring their "pedestrian"^ teams to a title like the aforementioned list of players who had significantly more talent AND better coaching than they did? Sorry but many on this board thread have become myopic on assessing great talent if not in a UConn uniform. We are better than that.
^footnote to Plebe on this phrase as I thought it accurately captures the average talent on these lower profile schools.
HoopsFan21 I hope you take heed to allow others their opinion without being directly contradictory. That's why it's called an opinion...not a fact.
Taking nothing away from Ms. Plum's accomplishment, which is something to marvel at...but my answer would be no.
Is there any doubt that anyone of the all-time greats you listed couldn't have scored/averaged 30+ points a game during their careers if they'd taken 40-50% of their respective teams' FGAs? FAKE NEWS Is there any doubt that any of the all-time greats you listed would trade one of their NCAA titles for an individual scoring award?
Washington's offense is all Plum, all the time. FAKE NEWS And it starts with her bringing the ball up as PG and then deciding whether to make a play or distribute the ball.
She took 28 of the team's 59 FGA's (47%) in her 57 point record breaking performance. The total assists for the team was 6 for the entire game and Plum had ZERO assists (as a guard no less)! The rest of the 10 players on the team (that all saw minutes in the game) combined for 27 points.
Does everyone feel that Plum would definitely be the #1 pick in the WNBA Draft?
I dont follow the W a lot, but whoever drafts first, normally the worst team(unless pick was a trade) do they have better guards than Plum has the potential to be?Does everyone feel that Plum would definitely be the #1 pick in the WNBA Draft?