KnightBridgeAZ
Grand Canyon Knight
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,342
- Reaction Score
- 9,127
I read some of the comments about Rutgers - wish we could have beat Tennessee - but noticed a few myths (some were only in one post). Just a very quick point on a couple of items:
- slumping attendance at the RAC has little to do with the style of play or the record (home record is actually excellent). The average fan that Rutgers attracts is the "casual" fan - really, really expensive tix and gameday costs, a lack of high profile opponents especially on weekends, and a lack of high profile success (i.e. not that we lost 13 games, but didn't go deep in the NCAA) are most likely much more to blame. Plus this season, the area around the RAC is under construction, access is not too good.
- Related, there was a comment about RU not supporting WBB. That's not exactly true, but the truth is that WBB has never been a priority for Rutgers. Also, fundraising has been focused on the stadium upgrades and now a potential RAC upgrade, which obviously will have peripheral benefits.
- Rutgers is really good this season. To someone whatching the game, it is even exciting! But I stand against those RU fans who continue to think we are a top 10 team and those who think we are not good at all. We are competitive with top 10 teams (see Tennessee and Miami), but are not over the hump. Rutgers does have the potential. Note how many freshmen are playing.
- Finally, Rutgers is what it is - a very good program under CVS. I previously argued on the RU board that CVS record at RU is completely consistent with her record previously. I would point out that our record against Tenn is worse than our record against UConn! I would argue that we have been consistently (on average) the 3rd best team in the Big East (some years, second) behind UConn and Notre Dame.
- slumping attendance at the RAC has little to do with the style of play or the record (home record is actually excellent). The average fan that Rutgers attracts is the "casual" fan - really, really expensive tix and gameday costs, a lack of high profile opponents especially on weekends, and a lack of high profile success (i.e. not that we lost 13 games, but didn't go deep in the NCAA) are most likely much more to blame. Plus this season, the area around the RAC is under construction, access is not too good.
- Related, there was a comment about RU not supporting WBB. That's not exactly true, but the truth is that WBB has never been a priority for Rutgers. Also, fundraising has been focused on the stadium upgrades and now a potential RAC upgrade, which obviously will have peripheral benefits.
- Rutgers is really good this season. To someone whatching the game, it is even exciting! But I stand against those RU fans who continue to think we are a top 10 team and those who think we are not good at all. We are competitive with top 10 teams (see Tennessee and Miami), but are not over the hump. Rutgers does have the potential. Note how many freshmen are playing.
- Finally, Rutgers is what it is - a very good program under CVS. I previously argued on the RU board that CVS record at RU is completely consistent with her record previously. I would point out that our record against Tenn is worse than our record against UConn! I would argue that we have been consistently (on average) the 3rd best team in the Big East (some years, second) behind UConn and Notre Dame.