Not sure it was a case of the best we could get as much as it who we selected. We probably had plenty of options if we pursued.
I haven’t dug in yet but you can bet the opposing fanbase perception, especially the blue bloods, is that last two years were a freak lucky mirage based on great talent anomaly. That Hurley is unhinged, it was all Luke Murray behind the scenes, blah blah. When you’re as polarizing a personality as Hurley is, you’re respected when you’re winning but fanbases cannot wait until you lose so they can call you a freak accident and lucky. The narrative is gonna run hot with him.
Take running pretty hot too.
Beware the power post that uses the second person singular. It's guilty of the charge it levels.
What kind of UConn fan wants to bet on what
opposing fans' perceptions of UConn will be? Not I. Leave something like that to those who don't care for UConn.
This is a parlor trick, masquerading as insight, but it's functionally no better than betting against your own team in order to claim a scoop you or any Husky fan ought not to want to have a part in.
"I was way out front in recognizing there would be no 3-peat" is not badge of pride. UConn fans are the only ones with the possibility of their team doing a 3-peat. Seize the opportunity to cheer for it to happen. When it comes to the NCAA Tournament, only one team ends the season without a loss. Cheer for it to happen. One game at a time.