- Joined
- Aug 29, 2016
- Messages
- 4,340
- Reaction Score
- 8,785
Not sure I want to continue the debate with someone who so glibly and deliberately mis-characterizes the statements of others, but I will give it one more try. Let me attempt this again stated as simply as possible.what's with the curmudgeon attitude and behavior.
First, DON'T give me: "I am a taxpayer and it is my money." That is a long frigging debate. And I will be detailed with all the costs and choices/options this University has made to be at this level of football."
Second. DON'T throw out the FCS doesn't lose money line ... unless you know the dollars and cents. This is easy and there are 10 case studies you can review nationally of how different Universities are proceeding. And ALMOST all the upgrades are a happy experience. They are - in general - southern, coastal, Texas universities that had nowhere the cache of most of the schools WE would even think of sending our kids. So ... BRAND and PR is a large part of the push. Who ever heard of Coastal Carolina or App State. I think the University of New Hampshire could be one of the coolest schools in the country if they promoted themselves right ... and YES ... I think that's about FBS. And that cool collegetown Durham + near proximity to Dover & Portsmouth & Boston. But NOOOO. Stuck.
Third. Economics law. If you have 15 schools that upgrade in the last 15 years and 30 since 1992 ... that there is everything. University Presidents and alumni are running to FBS. This guy Tuthill has said a few times - go FCS. It is not feasible. The best capitalized local University with a solid fanbase + facilities are scratching their head on that topic (yup Delaware) ... because the Division is frankly eroding.
If JIM MORA earns a P5 job from this exalted UCONN gig ... we are gonna be happy. That means he rebuilt us from the dumpster. And YES ... I have a UCLA degree too. I know more about that place than 125 others.
If, UConn is still having 1-11, 2-10, or 3-9 seasons five years from now, it will face huge pressure to step back to FCS. And deservedly so.
And second, I clearly said that the assertion that UConn would lose less money being in FBS than it would lose being in FCS, simply does not meet the eyeball test. (Compare that with your post above. There is a significant difference.) And I do not care what the ratios are, up to down. The numbers are very small and the up universities have their unique reasons. Literally every FCS university would change immediately if it was true.
I have and have had connections in the past to some universities. A close family member has been an associate dean and later VP of a graduate school. He tells me that it is impossible to do an apples to apples comparison of football program financials because there are no universal standards or regulations for doing the accounting in a manner that would facilitate making such a comparison. So we are left with the fact that there has been no wholesale migration of schools from FCS up to FBS.
Btw, I also have some very close family members with ties to UCLA -- not that it is germane to this discussion. Including one who just got a PhD from there, another who finished his from another well known institution while living at UCLA, and a longtime mathematics faculty member who was also the editor of the Journal of the AMS. I have no idea why this could could possibly be important. But since you apparently think it is germane, I just thought I would mention it.