- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 91,798
- Reaction Score
- 351,318
In today's world of CFP, this is worth quite a bit. I just hope we are looking at another guy coasting because we are not a CFP or bust school.without all the crazy pressure
I really don't think so.In today's world of CFP, this is worth quite a bit. I just hope we are looking at another guy coasting because we are not a CFP or bust school.
DB's Choice.
What a tough decision. I agree with what he did. You can't blame Moorhead for waiting to see if there is a better offer...but you have to sign the guy who is willing to commit now. There is some value in signing a guy who says "I don't need to wait for the season to end..I want this job".
Could have worked out with either coach... but you couldn't risk losing both.
I wonder if Herman was ever in the mix?
Anyway....That's why DB gets the big money!
Easy Coach it’s the real one…
It was a totally stupid thing to say . I hope Orlovsky apologized at some point.I totally forgot that happened. I don't blame AD David Benedict one bit for not looking to him for guidance or even having a conversation, especially when his loyalty may lean towards Edsall before UConn, at least when it comes to football.
Former UConn Quarterback Dan Orlovsky Clarifies 'Schmuck' Comment
Yeah, well, as a taxpayer I can tell you it is not a carte blanche, in perpetuity, situation. At some point the concept of throwing good money after bad comes into play. If UConn is still in the same place in five years from now as it is today, you will definitely see it come into play.anybody who said that - sportswriter or fan - is a complete Knucklehead. No institution or large org drops a several hundred million dollar investment. Of course, we had a steep climb; we understand. But this Mora hire is a Leap (as any would be); we then need to pull our panties up and try try harder. This is unacceptable.
They're not dropping down or getting rid of football..So tired of this suggestion.Yeah, well, as a taxpayer I can tell you it is not a carte blanche, in perpetuity, situation. At some point the concept of throwing good money after bad comes into play. If UConn is still in the same place in five years from now as it is today, you will definitely see it come into play.
What I said in a post a few months ago was that FCS would be preferable to continuing the level of competitiveness exhibited by this year's team. That if UConn was not prepared to get more serious about the sport, that is what they should do.
The idea that an institution would lose more money on FCS than FBS doesn't pass the eyeball test. Until we see apples to apples data that continues to be the conclusion. A LOT of FCS institutions have looked in depth at that question and to date only a trickle have made that move.
Since 2004Yeah, well, as a taxpayer I can tell you it is not a carte blanche, in perpetuity, situation. At some point the concept of throwing good money after bad comes into play. If UConn is still in the same place in five years from now as it is today, you will definitely see it come into play.
What I said in a post a few months ago was that FCS would be preferable to continuing the level of competitiveness exhibited by this year's team. That if UConn was not prepared to get more serious about the sport, that is what they should do.
The idea that an institution would lose more money on FCS than FBS doesn't pass the eyeball test. Until we see apples to apples data that continues to be the conclusion. A LOT of FCS institutions have looked in depth at that question and to date only a trickle have made that move.
Yeah, well, as a taxpayer I can tell you it is not a carte blanche, in perpetuity, situation. At some point the concept of throwing good money after bad comes into play. If UConn is still in the same place in five years from now as it is today, you will definitely see it come into play.
What I said in a post a few months ago was that FCS would be preferable to continuing the level of competitiveness exhibited by this year's team. That if UConn was not prepared to get more serious about the sport, that is what they should do.
The idea that an institution would lose more money on FCS than FBS doesn't pass the eyeball test. Until we see apples to apples data that continues to be the conclusion. A LOT of FCS institutions have looked in depth at that question and to date only a trickle have made that move.
Well I don’t think I have the answers here, my recall for these types of questions isn’t the best. Maybe others here could offer a more confident opinion.@Exit 4 who do you think inherited a better team? Diaco after PP or Mora after Edsall 2.0?
I really hope the answer is Mora…
knucklehead
I am never giving you a regional mall to manage
Well I don’t think I have the answers here, my recall for these types of questions isn’t the best. Maybe others here could offer a more confident opinion.
I think my answer is that PP was left a better roster with respect it’s entire balance, but I would venture to guess this roster has better athletes at the WR position and more players with a higher upside that are underclassman.
Can we please stop with the taxpayer nonsense. I get it but UConn and UConn Health are almost $3 billion budget. The taxpayers contribute about $400 million. Plus another $200 million in bonding payments. So around 13% of the operating budget. Ideal word UConn would be spun off as a quasi-public. Another way of looking at it..UConn generates $8 for every buck the taxpayers give it.Yeah, well, as a taxpayer I can tell you it is not a carte blanche, in perpetuity, situation. At some point the concept of throwing good money after bad comes into play. If UConn is still in the same place in five years from now as it is today, you will definitely see it come into play.
What I said in a post a few months ago was that FCS would be preferable to continuing the level of competitiveness exhibited by this year's team. That if UConn was not prepared to get more serious about the sport, that is what they should do.
The idea that an institution would lose more money on FCS than FBS doesn't pass the eyeball test. Until we see apples to apples data that continues to be the conclusion. A LOT of FCS institutions have looked in depth at that question and to date only a trickle have made that move.
Seeing as no one here actually knows the guy, It a fair question to ask given the last few coaches mailing it in at several points in light of there being better options for a guy with his resume. Another option is there is a lot of meat on the bone for someone looking to flip a UConn coaching stint into a better payday.
Personally, my hope is that given his age and ties to the area (yes, he now has some that he didn't last time he coached) is that he is successful enough for him to stay a while and for us to want him to stay a while.