The kids have parents, academic advisers, etc.I think it’s a poor reflection on the coaches, that’s all.
The good news is we are trying to create positive change
The kids have parents, academic advisers, etc.I think it’s a poor reflection on the coaches, that’s all.
It really is a damn shame RE refused to recruit the preps and transfers; really cut off his to nose to spite his face. I wonder if Warde and Benedict rode him on this stubbornness? If not, they should have - it cost us some level of competiveness. SMH.HCJM & Co. giving offers to multiple prep school athletes can have benefits for both sides. For UConn it offers easier inroads to local prep athletes who might otherwise sign with out of state schools. Randy was famous for shunning local preps.
For the prep coaches, it makes it easier to recruit higher caliber athletes as they can show that players on their current roster are getting a lot of interest & being placed on FBS teams.
Love the haka if well performed.Forget Europe. Down under mate.
![]()
Have we considered factors such as the population of Texas and Florida is just an it’s Betsy larger than CT. There are counties in Texas that are nearly as big as our state. High school football in Texas is somewhere between an obsession and a religion. So we cannot compete in raw numbers but even though we are a small state let’s think and act big in quality.I’m sure Coach Mora can read the same data I can and he isn’t going to invest lots of time in getting Connecticut kids. A few now to fill slots maybe and build some bridges, but over the last 15 years or so Connecticut has averaged 10 FBS signees per year, highest number in 2019 with 18, lowest was 5 A couple of times. Texas and Florida average over 320 each over the same period. New Jersey around 50, PA 65, so you really can’t just recruit locally. And of note UConn brings in at least a few of those local kids every year. We had +- 18 Connecticut kids on the roster this season. Assuming they were equally distributed ( they probably weren’t) that’s 3.5 per year or 35% of the local FBS kids. Given all the other factors at play I’m not sure you will ever do much better.
The other thing of note as Pudge says, many come from prep programs. Better coaching better competition, and since at least some guys are doing post grad years, older and physically more mature. Bottom line is we have 1 guy on staff who is tied into the local system..we certainly don't need 2-3. As I noted many times before, there are high schools in Texas and Florida that turn out more FBS players than Connecticut does. A few years ago, the high school my brother’s kids attended had 6 on just the defensive side of the ball.
What does one make of this?I'm not going to post all of them, but it looks like all of the previous job postings were re-posted on December 1, with a closing date of December 6.
Dominoes falling all over CFB…What does one make of this?
Hmmm... somebody is now looking for a job that wasn't when these postings first went up. Virginia?Dominoes falling all over CFB…
This is the dumbest part of UConn FB search. Some HR person probably said that they needed to pos the job. I dont understand how, on earth, they make HR go through this dog and pony show. Makes a mockery of open-ended hiring TBH, Just exempt coaching jobs. What would happen if Bill Parcells applied. By rule he should get an interview. LOL. Then when we don’t hire him, age discrimination?What does one make of this?
It's one of those by the books CT things.. The legal stuff in this state rules..This is the dumbest part of UConn FB search. Some HR person probably said that they needed to pos the job. I dont understand how, on earth, they make HR go through this dog and pony show. Makes a mockery of open-ended hiring TBH, Just exempt coaching jobs. What would happen if Bill Parcells applied. By rule he should get an interview. LOL. Then when we don’t hire him, age discrimination?
Maybe that’s why I have not heard back?I don’t believe everyone gets an interview.
I think all these things are important, which makes what UConn does a mockery of the system.These laws aren’t perfect, but they all exist for a reason. If you think that taxpayer money should go to the most qualified, and not reserved for friends of bosses even if they are overwhelmingly white and male, how do you not require some amount in opening in the hiring process?
Unless you think that college sports are so damn important that letting coaches hiring quickly and freely is more important than anti-discrimination laws.
Easier said than done since they are part of the AAUP Bargaining Unit.I think all these things are important, which makes what UConn does a mockery of the system.
Just exempt coaches. These are essentially networked positions. You can’t attain this job blind without a referral. It isnt an open position.
Huh? The entire purpose of these laws is because we’ve learned that if you let bosses hire based solely on networking, the bottom line is that consciously or not they are more likely to hire people like them. So if you’re telling me these laws getting others into the process don’t go far enough, we are in agreement. But why should we care less about trying to end discrimination in hiring less in coaching than for professors? I’m happy to hear an argument but you didn’t make one. You just said “these are essentially networked positions” which is just saying we don’t care because it has always been otherwise.I think all these things are important, which makes what UConn does a mockery of the system.
Just exempt coaches. These are essentially networked positions. You can’t attain this job blind without a referral. It isnt an open position.