nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 44,614
- Reaction Score
- 34,391
You can't complain about your seeding if you lose to Rutgers and Providence in the same year.
What's the rule? UConn played a Big East team in the 2nd round last year.
I don't love the draw, but this point here is key. It's what Butler did last year, and a number of other teams have done in the past.And if you beat the one seed in round two, you become the one seed.
Not only that, I think Iona owes their selection to JC.
ADD: UConn was not a natural match for UK by the S-curve. It had to be adjusted.
Wasn't UConn 34th? So in theory they moved up 1 slot into the 32/33 game.
So you agree with me?
Probably because the 34 would have been matched up with Syracuse.Wasn't UConn 34th? So in theory they moved up 1 slot into the 32/33 game.
I know there is no guarantee we beat ISU and that Jeff had to recuse himself from our selection/seeding. But if you don't think he screwed us by having us play UK the second game doesn't know Jeff. In his heart of hearts I guarantee you Calhoun thinks that happened.
Remember Jeff's quotes in the paper addressing various conspiracies ahead of time and it reminds me of the Shakespere quote about he who protests too much.
Also, throw in the Kentucky location and Jeff and Emmert got their revenge.
It was a huge mistake giving him that $1 Big East job. If he did not have that job - no Committee Chairman position.
They supposedly did today at 7:00 on TruTV. I didn't watch it, though.The S-curve breaks down on the first line. Hathaway admitted that Missouri was the committee's 8 overall seed, so they should be in Kentucky's region (the top 1). If it breaks down at the top of the curve, they certainly aren't going to be true to it in the middle, where there's really no difference between anyone seeded 7-10.
Plus the RPI is not the committee's seed. Syracuse is No. 1 in the RPI, but Kentucky is the No. 1 seed. To my knowledge, the NCAA does not release the information on where every team was ranked by the committee from 1-68 (beyond the No. 1 seeds).
I like our bracket and seeding. Drummond shows scouts why they should stop drooling over Anthony Davis. Lamb on Lamb goes our way. I say we knock off an overrated Ky. afyter squeaking by an underrated Iowa St.
The Selection Committee released the 1-68 full list for the first time this year, see http://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-men/article/2012-03-11/kentucky-snares-no-1-overall-seed.The S-curve breaks down on the first line. Hathaway admitted that Missouri was the committee's 8 overall seed, so they should be in Kentucky's region (the top 1). If it breaks down at the top of the curve, they certainly aren't going to be true to it in the middle, where there's really no difference between anyone seeded 7-10.
Plus the RPI is not the committee's seed. Syracuse is No. 1 in the RPI, but Kentucky is the No. 1 seed. To my knowledge, the NCAA does not release the information on where every team was ranked by the committee from 1-68 (beyond the No. 1 seeds).
The Selection Committee released the 1-68 full list for the first time this year, see http://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-men/article/2012-03-11/kentucky-snares-no-1-overall-seed.
Sad but very true!The system did what it's supposed to do. We did not have a good enough regular season to be rewarded with an easy draw.
My main thing with a potential UK matchup is that if Cal has any brains MKG will be on Lamb when we're in a 2G set and he definitely will be on him in a 3G set, that is about the worst possible matchup you want covering Lamb. MKG is a beast defensively and he would make it a physical game.
I understand, but I feel the best time to face a team like KY is right after they dispose of an easy opponent in game one. They expect to beat us, that's when upsets happen. I'm actually more concerned about Iowa St.