- Joined
- May 7, 2014
- Messages
- 14,716
- Reaction Score
- 30,961
Syracuse > TulsaWeHa > Tulsa
Syracuse > TulsaWeHa > Tulsa
Chief lived in WeHa in the early 90’s for a few years. I liked it. Since then, they have put in a lot of traffic lights that makes it tougher to get around. However, overall lots of positive changes.
#200 player? Wow, that's a pretty low rating. How could that be if we're so hot on him?
He’s just thin, he’s pretty lanky at 6’2/6’3. He’ll fill out wherever he goesHe's small, so he doesn't project out.
I never really look at ESPN’s recruiting site anymore cuz it has fallen behind, but they have Dawes ranked slightly above Gaffney at 95 compared to 97. Thought that was interesting since the board has a much different narrative.
Ok - Chief will use his Economics /Finance background to help clarify. The problem with using the poverty rate as a metrics is it doesn’t factor in the local cost of living. As of a few years ago, for a family of 4, it’s the percentage of people making less than $23,000 regardless if they live in NYC, San Francisco or Biloxi, Mississippi. I don’t really need to go any further, I think you understand it’s not a meaningful measurement.
Another flaw with using the poverty rate as a metrics is that it doesn’t include government support programs like food stamps, programs such as SNAP, Rental assistance/Section 8, health programs like Husky and so on.
#ChiefCertified
provided the data in my earlier posts and World Class analysis. You go based on emotions and limited anecdotes.
Rankings are relevant to a degree, but trust in the coaches to go after the right guys. There are other factors besides rankings. I am not as knowledgeable as many guys on this board, but I have heard in the past that “ politics” plays a role in these rankings. Not sure what to make of that, maybe someone could elaborate.
Here's a little comparison using their AAU numbers this year. Green represents an advantage over the other player, red means "red flag".Gaffney played much better, is more athletic, and shoots at a MUCH higher %% than dawes. There is no doubt he is the better player.
Wong > gaffney > dawes.
Here's a little comparison using their AAU numbers this year. Green represents an advantage over the other player, red means "red flag".
View attachment 34209
Wow @Chief00 - For a quick second, I found myself admiring how in depth your knowledge was, and how sensible you made your argument. It was a view into the "real world" of Chief. Then I read further...
Ahh, there's the Chief we all know and love. Either way, I wish you could be as in depth and make as much sense with your reporting of UConn basketball as you do with finance/economics
Love,
#1 Chief Fan (Casual of course)
Well done. Interesting layout and data. Thanks.Here's a little comparison using their AAU numbers this year. Green represents an advantage over the other player, red means "red flag".
View attachment 34209
But,
“Line up all the Economists in Washington DC and they form a circle”
Professor Weiner
He was correct that many economic arguments are circular. And where does a circle start or end? What causes a circle?
Enough of deep economic thought, as for my basketball knowledge, don’t always assume the problem is with the teacher. Just kidding.
Lol it’s funny you say that because I got rid of the above and as I did I was like “why didn’t I include him?" But I'm bored at work anyways so I just redid it.Props, man. Think we can get the same with Wong included??
Handle/postHere's a little comparison using their AAU numbers this year. Green represents an advantage over the other player, red means "red flag".
But,
“Line up all the Economists in Washington DC and they form a circle”
Professor Weiner
He was correct that many economic arguments are circular. And where does a circle start or end? What causes a circle?
Enough of deep economic thought, as for my basketball knowledge, don’t always assume the problem is with the teacher. Just kidding.
Lol it’s funny you say that because I got rid of the above and as I did I was like “why didn’t I include him?" But I'm bored at work anyways so I just redid it.
View attachment 34212
I included some ties with the green, but you'll notice that most of Dawes' advantages over Gaffney were overtaken by Wong. I gave Gaffney the 3P edge over Wong because his percentages are better and he takes twice as many 3PA/G.
Was just talking to a buddy about this... My take:Gaffney looks good in these comparisons. Most of his disadvantages would be remedied by more strength, and that is the easiest thing to fix. I would give Wong the shooting edge based on his FT%, but it is slight, and the difference in assists and A/TO is dramatic. Gaffney might have more upside than Wong based on these stats.
Holy moly. Take a lap Chief because you absolutely butchered that quote. Not even close.
Both great talents, but I just think Wong has that "takeover" ability/mentality, whereas Gaffney doesn't, likely because he's always played with Reddish, Antoine, or Lewis so was never "the guy".
Holy moly. Take a lap Chief because you absolutely butchered that quote. Not even close.
Lol it’s funny you say that because I got rid of the above and as I did I was like “why didn’t I include him?" But I'm bored at work anyways so I just redid it.
View attachment 34212
I included some ties with the green, but you'll notice that most of Dawes' advantages over Gaffney were overtaken by Wong. I gave Gaffney the 3P edge over Wong because his percentages are better and he takes twice as many 3PA/G.