- Joined
- May 7, 2014
- Messages
- 15,047
- Reaction Score
- 32,450
Because that makes him jump higher...?Would have been more impressed if he didn't throw it off the wall first
Because that makes him jump higher...?Would have been more impressed if he didn't throw it off the wall first
YesBecause that makes him jump higher...?
He's throwing a basketball off a wall so he can throw down an insane windmill dunk in a casual enough environment where people are videoing him.Why do you think he threw it off the wall? For fun?
You made it sound like you didn't understand why throwing it off the wall matters.He's throwing a basketball off a wall so he can throw down an insane windmill dunk in a casual enough environment where people are videoing him.
No he's doing it for fun.
Yes, believe it or not, he completed a windmill dunk after throwing the ball off the back wall in a UConn practice facility in the middle of summer FOR FUN.Don't get me wrong, it's still great. But everyone knows it's easier to jump without the ball in your hands. Why do you think he threw it off the wall? For fun?
This is UConn basketball in the eyes of the almighty boneyard, of course he's not allowed to have fun!!!!!!!! *sarcasm*Don't get me wrong, it's still great. But everyone knows it's easier to jump without the ball in your hands. Why do you think he threw it off the wall? For fun?
I don't know. If he had a nubile woman or two clinging to his back when he threw down that dunk that would have been FUN. What he did was pedantic.Yes, believe it or not, he completed a windmill dunk after throwing the ball off the back wall in a UConn practice facility in the middle of summer FOR FUN.
Him or Larrier you'd have to think.So is he the favorite to win the slam dunk contest this year?
Or Purv. Or Shonn. Wow we have some athletes on this team.Him or Larrier you'd have to think.
Should I be worried that he doesn't use his left hand at all? BTW, today is lefthanders day!
I don't think it will happen and I don't think it would be a good thing if it did. Chemistry will be key for us this year. Probably best if Jalen gets his minutes of the bench, even if they end up being "starter minutes."It's exciting to think a talent like Jalen will likely be coming off of our bench. But if he claims a starting spot with Gibss it could even be more exciting?
I don't think it will happen and I don't think it would be a good thing if it did. Chemistry will be key for us this year. Probably best if Jalen gets his minutes of the bench, even if they end up being "starter minutes."
So youre saying adams shouldn't start because it will mess up team chemistry? if adams is gifted enough to usurp either gibbs or purvis in crunch time, so be it, winning games is more important than keeping everyone happy with minutes to close games. Say adams keeps outplaying everybody in the backcourt in second halfs, you better believe ollie will start him with the swiftness.I don't think it will happen and I don't think it would be a good thing if it did. Chemistry will be key for us this year. Probably best if Jalen gets his minutes of the bench, even if they end up being "starter minutes."
I don't know why people keep saying this. Our two ball handlers could be oiur two best players and I still wouldn't want them both on the court to start the game. I want them staggered by 5 min of game time so that one is resting the other and protecting the other from foul trouble.Quite frankly, I have always said its more about playing time rather than starting - especially crunch time minutes. Having said that - no way is Adams out of the starting lineup by mid season and probably earlier. He's too good.
Calm down Mau, he's high school exciting. LOLIt's exciting to think a talent like Jalen will likely be coming off of our bench. But if he claims a starting spot with Gibss it could even be more exciting?
Not worried about Gibbs so much, but yeah it likely would be a bad thing if Purvis is sitting at the start of games. Just my guess, though. The rest of your post is kind of pointless, so I won't bother with it.So youre saying adams shouldn't start because it will mess up team chemistry? if adams is gifted enough to usurp either gibbs or purvis in crunch time, so be it, winning games is more important than keeping everyone happy with minutes to close games. Say adams keeps outplaying everybody in the backcourt in second halfs, you better believe ollie will start him with the swiftness.