Bigboote
That's big-boo-TAY
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2016
- Messages
- 7,149
- Reaction Score
- 36,469
You know things are bad when Pitino is making the most sense.
You answered your own questionThey bring in a huge television audience from the Dallas and surrounding areas. Also, they are foregoing their tv money. Their boosters have very deep pockets. My question is why a conference that prides itself on academics and ethics would bring in a school that has been heavily penalized twice and one of them being the so called "death penalty."
And what about all the other sports teams? It's a sad joke how the purse strings rule college athletes' lives.This CBS Sports article describes how scheduling will work for ACC basketball.
Teams that travel west will play 2 CA games on the same trip.
The western teams will play 2 games against teams in close proximity on the same trip.
SMU, Cal & Stanford will play each other 2X per year.
ACC adding Stanford, Cal and SMU means the conference's days of being an elite basketball league are over
ACC adding Stanford, Cal and SMU means the conference's days of being an elite basketball league are over
Cal, Stanford and SMU will make the ACC bigger, but with 18 teams it will definitely not be betterwww.cbssports.com
I'd guess that each ACC school will alternate & only need to travel cross country once every other year.And what about all the other sports teams? It's a sad joke how the purse strings rule college athletes' lives.
I'm excited to see how many WBB seasons there are when Stanford and Notre Dame only play each other once during the regularseason...ACC adding Stanford, Cal and SMU means the conference's days of being an elite basketball league are over — CBS Sports
Adding three teams will hurt ACC in basketballapple.news
This is about ACC men BB but many of these issues apply to women’s BB.
Sounds great....but it is no longer a choice, it is survival...the balance sheet $$$$$$Someone once said that if you want to know the future, look at the past. I think that many of us growing up bought most of our items from places like Murphy's five and ten, Woolworth's, Sear's and Roebuck and the A&P. There were the businesses that ended most of the "Mom and Pop" stores. Then along came the Malls and there went Murphys and Woolworth. Now we have Amazon and Wal Mart and poof, there go the malls. My point is this - right now we are looking at a Power 4 world but within a very short period of time we are going to be watching a group of cannibals and the only thing they will be feeding on is themselves. Schools like Vanderbuilt, Indiana, and the other second class football factories will be told they will have to start taking a smaller share of the revenue. Think it won't happen? When was the last time you went to a 5 & 10? Uconn is in a solid conference with a group of very good schools who arn't arguing about who should get a bigger share. Let's keep it that way.
.
It's not very entertaining or exciting to watch UConn WBB play so many blow games against other Big East teams.Uconn is in a solid conference with a group of very good schools who arn't arguing about who should get a bigger share. Let's keep it that way.
So, wouldn't the conference that only makes 4 million per school in media distributions, rather than the 70 million of the big 2 (or the 45 million of the little 2) be considered the five and dime in that analogy?When was the last time you went to a 5 & 10? Uconn is in a solid conference with a group of very good schools who arn't arguing about who should get a bigger share. Let's keep it that way.
As I recall Geno has always scheduled the top women's teams in the country during the regular season and our record against them has been pretty good. As for a brand, I think Uconn has the trademark for women's basketball.It's not very entertaining or exciting to watch UConn WBB play so many blow games against other Big East teams.
In 2022 - 23 UConn lost 2 games against BE teams, & in 2021 -22 they lost 1 game which can be attributed to injuries & a short bench.
But UConn usually blows out the other BE teams by 30 - 40 points.
IMO it's not the best way to generate maximum interest in UConn WBB & may even hinder recruiting in the NIL age.
For now UConn relies on Geno's reputation for recruiting, but a change of conference could help elevate UConn's recruitment, brand & following to a whole new level in the future.
I'd like to expound on the subject because it's not only me.As I recall Geno has always scheduled the top women's teams in the country during the regular season and our record against them has been pretty good. As for a brand, I think Uconn has the trademark for women's basketball.
Was the AAC any different? Personally, I think that conference was worse for them compared to the Big East. Currently, there isn't a conference that would be a good fit. However, we're looking at this from a WBB perspective. These moves aren't being made for WBB.I'd like to expound on the subject because it's not only me.
Recent poll results show that a whopping 83.3% would prefer that UConn belong to another conference.
Most of the people that responded are UConn WBB fans.
Poll - Which Conference Do You Favor for UConn?
I haven't seen any official Big 12 announcement of a vote taken for or against UConn being invited to join it, only a Tweet saying that it was denied. However if given a choice, which conference do you favor the most for UConn to join?the-boneyard.com
There has been some notable BE players like Morrow, Park Lane & others that have transferred out of the conference which can lead to a decline in the level of conference play.
UConn is so much larger compared to the other BE schools, even their BB arenas seem to have a way smaller capacity than the number of fans that UConn should be able to draw on the road.
Frankly, I doubt that UConn WBB has had conference rivals that were very good since they belonged to the old Big East when they would play Notre Dame & Syracuse.
UConn is drawing fans but it seems that they could be better off in another conference.
There's still a matter of almost 20 or more blow out conference games for a long stretch of the season including the BE Tourney romps.
Every team & conference has a ranking, and it generally seems that UConn WBB outclasses their conference opponents by so much that it makes most all the BE teams look weak & not very competitive.
They can't compete for enough of the blue chip players that can give them a chance to win games against UConn except under the direst of circumstances.
So many WBB teams have parity but usually not the ones in the Big East.
Someday UConn will benefit by moving up into a more competitive WBB conference.
You're absolutely right!Was the AAC any different? Personally, I think that conference was worse for them compared to the Big East. Currently, there isn't a conference that would be a good fit. However, we're looking at this from a WBB perspective. These moves aren't being made for WBB.
There are a bunch of teams that also don't add much value to their conferences, but they still benefit. They're just patsies for the top teams.We may not like it, but college sports currently doesn't work that way. Demanding that the ACC take UConn into their conference will have almost no impact on decisions made. Unfortunately, the value added that UConn could bring to these conferences from basketball (both men's and women's) has very little influence on media rights negotiations for the Power 4 (eventually 2) conferences. It has nothing to do with fairness, or history. It's all about the conferences negotiating media rights for football. At present UConn football, though improving, offers little in perceived value to increase market share for the major conferences. That may change, but it's going to take several years of consistent success on the gridiron.
That may be true.We may not like it, but college sports currently doesn't work that way. Demanding that the ACC take UConn into their conference will have almost no impact on decisions made. Unfortunately, the value added that UConn could bring to these conferences from basketball (both men's and women's) has very little influence on media rights negotiations for the Power 4 (eventually 2) conferences. It has nothing to do with fairness, or history. It's all about the conferences negotiating media rights for football. At present UConn football, though improving, offers little in perceived value to increase market share for the major conferences. That may change, but it's going to take several years of consistent success on the gridiron.
That may be true.
But something persuaded North Carolina to vote to admit the new ACC schools.
What we don't know is how many or which schools that UConn would need to persuade to get invited.
The ACC commissioner can have some sway if provided with the proper ammunition.
That's how Rutgers got admitted to the Big 10.
There must be potential media studies to determine whether UConn can deliver TV viewership.
Who knows what UConn has done to try to sell itself & lobby.
Somehow enough exciting college BB match ups should be able to add to the ACC bottom line.
It must be more than only about UConn football being winners since some of the realignment expansion teams of both growing conferences are not winning football programs.
There must be more to it going on behind the scenes.
Perhaps the ACC will really want UConn to bite the bullet & sacrifice a lot of TV revenue before they'll be invited, resulting in long term suffering.
Even Notre Dame has most all of its sports in the ACC except for football.
Maybe a similar route by UConn would produce more revenue than the Big East does.
I don't really that to happen but just saying that Notre Dame sports was given preference by the ACC without including football.
Meanwhile the UConn WBB schedule suffers in the Big East & the fans can only grumble about it.
Maybe we should blame the UConn AD for chosing the BE instead of exploring other options.
They keep the info. about their options a secret while the rest of the UConn nation only pays for it.