JoePgh
Cranky pants and wise acre
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 4,062
- Reaction Score
- 24,977
I think that the problem that you have identified is undeniable, and (given what happened with Boykin and the recruiting whiffs on front court players) it falls under the general heading of "Compost Happens".
So assuming that the roster we see is the roster that UConn will have in November (i.e., no manna from Azura), what does that mean? Undeniably it means that UConn won't be as intimidating in the paint as it has been basically since the beginning of the Tina Charles era (which was the fall of 2006). And therefore UConn won't be as good a team. They won't be nearly as good next year as they have been in the recent past.
But what does THAT mean? Instead of beating good opponents (like in the Final Four) by 30 points and very good opponents playing their A game by 10 points, it means that they will probably beat good opponents by 10 to 15 points and lose some games to very good opponents playing their A game. That does not rule out a National Championship (although it would be a close call and require some tactical wins in close games), and it does not make a Final Four unlikely -- but it makes it LESS likely.
And I agree with those who say that Lou will play in the paint on defense -- not so much on offense. She will not be as good as Stewart, Tuck, Stokes, or Dolson, but she will be a B or B+ defensive forward. And that will be enough (with her versatile inside-out offense and the other talent on the team) to win 30 or more games. But probably not good enough to win a 5th NC in a row.
So assuming that the roster we see is the roster that UConn will have in November (i.e., no manna from Azura), what does that mean? Undeniably it means that UConn won't be as intimidating in the paint as it has been basically since the beginning of the Tina Charles era (which was the fall of 2006). And therefore UConn won't be as good a team. They won't be nearly as good next year as they have been in the recent past.
But what does THAT mean? Instead of beating good opponents (like in the Final Four) by 30 points and very good opponents playing their A game by 10 points, it means that they will probably beat good opponents by 10 to 15 points and lose some games to very good opponents playing their A game. That does not rule out a National Championship (although it would be a close call and require some tactical wins in close games), and it does not make a Final Four unlikely -- but it makes it LESS likely.
And I agree with those who say that Lou will play in the paint on defense -- not so much on offense. She will not be as good as Stewart, Tuck, Stokes, or Dolson, but she will be a B or B+ defensive forward. And that will be enough (with her versatile inside-out offense and the other talent on the team) to win 30 or more games. But probably not good enough to win a 5th NC in a row.


